Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

When Relationships are Broken: Restorative Justice under a Levinasian Approach

  • Published:
Philosophy of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The issue of damaged relationships and of repairing them is very important, especially in recent years with reports of organizations which damage relationships with various stakeholders. Many studies have investigated how individuals react to damaged relationships after perceiving injustice or receiving offense in organizations. A part of this research has been focused on revenge or other types of negative responses. However, individuals can choose to react in other ways than revenge, willing to repair relationships through reconciliation. Recently, the effectiveness of reconciliation to repair damaged relationship in organizations has been linked to restorative justice. For the purpose of this article we are interested in understanding how restorative justice can be effective in repairing damaged or broken relationships in organizations, as inspired by principles of compassion or mercy. In this sense, we look for a convincing philosophical foundation for restorative justice, proposing Levinas’ ethics as a way to justify it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aasland, D.G. 2007. The exteriority of ethics in management and its transition into justice: A Levinasian approach to ethics in business. Business Ethics: A European Review 16 (3): 220–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J.S. 1963. Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67 (5): 422–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allers, C.R. 2011. Undoing what has been done: Hannah Arendt and Emmanuel Levinas on forgiveness. In Forgiveness. promise, possibility & failure, ed. G. Karabin and K. Wigura, 171–181. Freeland: Inter-Disciplinary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, M.L., M.A. Seabright, and M. Schminke. 2002. Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 89 (1): 947–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., S.L. Grover, B. Goldman, and R. Folger. 2003. When push doesn’t come to shove: Interpersonal forgiveness in workplace relationships. Journal of Management Inquiry 12 (3): 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., and A. Reed II. 2002. The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (6): 1423–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., T.M. Tripp, and R.J. Bies. 2001. How employees respond to interpersonal offense: The effects of blame attribution, offender status, and victim status on revenge and reconciliation in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (1): 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., T.M. Tripp, and R.J. Bies. 2006. Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (3): 653–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., and J. Roberts. 2011. All in the mind? Ethical identity and the allure of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 101 (1): 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertels, S., M. Cody, and S. Pek. 2014. A responsive approach to organizational misconduct: rehabilitation, reintegration, and the reduction of reoffense. Business Ethics Quarterly 24 (3): 343–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, D., and H. Corvellec. 2007. The impossibility of corporate ethics: For a levinasian approach to managerial ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review 16 (3): 208–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R.J., and J.S. Moag. 1986. Interactional justice: Communication criteria for fairness. In Research on negotiation in organizations Vol. 1, ed. R.J. Lewicki, B.H. Sheppard, and M.H. Bazerman, 43–55. Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blok, V. 2017a. Levinasian ethics in business. In Encyclopedia of business and professional ethics, ed. D. Poff and A. Michalos, 1–5. Cham, Switzerland: Spinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blok, V. 2017b. Bridging the gap between individual and corporate responsible behaviour: Toward a performative concept of corporate codes. Philosophy of Management 16 (2): 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordia, P., S.L.D. Restubog, and R.L. Tang. 2008. When employees strike back: Investigating mediating mechanisms between psychological contract breach and workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (5): 1104–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradfield, M., and K. Aquino. 1999. The effects of blame attributions and offender likableness on forgiveness and revenge in the workplace. Journal of Management 2 (5): 697–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. 1999. Restorative justice: Assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts. Crime and Justice 25: 1–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burggraeve, R. 2003. The Wisdom of love in the service of love: Emmanuel Levinas on justice, peace and human rights. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, D., and C. Rhodes. 2007. Ethics, alterity, and organizational justice. Business Ethics: A European Review 16 (3): 239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J.A. 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (3): 386–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., Z. Byrne, D. Bobocel, and D. Rupp. 2001. Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior 58 (2): 164–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., B. Goldman, and R. Folger. 2003. Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. Journal of Organizational Behavior 24 (8): 1919–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., and J.H. Stein. 2009. Organizational justice and behavioral ethics: Promises and prospects. Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (2): 193–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D., and A. Van Hiél. 2006. Effects of another person’s fair treatment on one’s own emotions and behaviors: The moderating role of how much other cares for you. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 100 (2): 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K.T., R.J. Lewicki, and A. Zaheer. 2009. Repairing relationships within and between organizations: Building a conceptual foundation. Academy of Management Review 34 (1): 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulac, T., J.A.M. Coyle-Shapiro, D.J. Henderson, and S.J. Wayne. 2008. Not all responses to breach are the same: The interconnection of social exchange and psychological contract processes in organizations. Academy of Management Journal 51 (6): 1079–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elangovan, A.R., and D.L. Shapiro. 1998. Betrayal of trust in organizations. Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 547–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faldetta, G. 2016. Organizational caring and organizational justice: Some implications for the employment relationship. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 24 (1): 64–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faldetta, G. 2018. A relational approach to responsibility in organizations: The logic of gift and Levinasian ethics for a ‘corporeal’ responsibility. Culture and Organization 24 (3): 196–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrin, D.L., P.H. Kim, C.D. Cooper, and K.T. Dirks. 2007. Silence speaks volumes: The effectiveness of reticence in comparison to apology and denial for responding to integrity-and competence-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (4): 893–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. 2001. Fairness as deonance. In Research in social issues in management, ed. S.W. Gilliland, D.D. Steiner, and D.P. Skarlicki, 3–31. Greenwich: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, M., and M.R. Fellenz. 2008. Hypocrisies of fairness: Towards a more reflexive ethical base in organizational justice research and practice. Journal of Business Ethics 78 (3): 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, J. 2016. Retrieving philosophy in management and organization science. Philosophy of Management 15 (2): 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, N., and G. Dietz. 2009. Trust repair after an organization-level failure. Academy of Management Review 34 (1): 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, J., and K. Aquino. 2010. And restorative justice for all: Redemption, forgiveness, and reintegration in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior 31 (4): 624–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, J., and K.D. Butterfield. 2010. Extending the horizon of business ethics: Restorative justice and the aftermath of unethical behavior. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (3): 453–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, J., K.D. Butterfield, M.D. Pfarrer, and A.C. Wicks. 2014. Individual and organizational reintegration after ethical or legal transgressions: Challenges and opportunities. Business Ethics Quarterly 24 (3): 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gromet, D.M., and T.G. Okimoto. 2014. Back into the fold: The influence of offender amends and victim forgiveness on peer reintegration. Business Ethics Quarterly 24 (3): 411–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. 2003. As if business ethics were possible, ‘within such limits’. Organization 10 (2): 223–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamali, E. 2007. Has the guest arrived yet? Emmanuel Levinas, a stranger in business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review 16 (3): 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelloway, E.K., L. Francis, M. Prosser, and J.E. Cameron. 2010. Counterproductive work behavior as protest. Human Resource Management Review 20 (1): 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, D.L. 2007. Restorative justice: Not “rights”, but the right way to heal relationships at work. International Journal of Conflict Management 18 (1): 4–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P.H., K.T. Dirks, and C.D. Cooper. 2009. The repair of trust: A dynamic bilateral perspective and multilevel conceptualization. Academy of Management Review 34 (3): 401–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P.H., D.L. Ferrin, C.D. Cooper, and K.T. Dirks. 2004. Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence-versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (1): 104–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R.M. 1999. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology 50 (1): 569–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R.M., and R.J. Lewicki. 2010. Repairing and enhancing trust: Approaches to reducing organizational trust deficits. The Academy of Management Annals 4 (1): 245–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labianca, G., and D.J. Brass. 2006. Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review 31 (3): 596–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labianca, G., D.J. Brass, and B. Gray. 1998. Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Academy of Management Journal 41 (1): 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T.B., and S.L. Robinson. 2007. Ain’t misbehavin: Workplace deviance as organizational resistance. Journal of Management 33 (3): 378–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledoux, L. 2012. Philosophy: Today’s manager’s best Ffiend? Philosophy of Management 11 (3): 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. 1969. Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. 1972. Humanisme de l’autre homme. Saint-Clement-la-Riviere, France: Fata Morgana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. 1981. Otherwise than being or beyond essence. New York. In NY: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. 1998. Entre nous. Thinking-of-the-other. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R.J., D.J. McAllister, and R.J. Bies. 1998. Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 438–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, S.R., J. Gygi, S. Plowman, and S.C. Hammond. 2009. Forgiveness as a workplace intervention: The literature and a proposed framework. Journal of Applied and Behavioral Management 10 (2): 246–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, S. 2008. Proximity and rationalisation: The limits of a Levinasian ethics in the context of corporate governance and regulation. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (3): 565–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M.S., and M.L. Ambrose. 2007. Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (4): 1159–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E.W., and S.L. Robinson. 1997. When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review 22 (1): 226–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okimoto, T.G., and M. Wenzel. 2014. Bridging diverging perspectives and repairing damaged relationships in the aftermath of workplace transgressions. Business Ethics Quarterly 24 (3): 443–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary-Kelly, A.M., R.W. Griffin, and D.J. Glew. 1996. Organization-motivated aggression: A research framework. Academy of Management Review 21 (1): 225–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, J., and K. Aquino. 2011. A model of third parties’ morally motivated responses to mistreatment in organizations. Academy of Management Review 36 (3): 526–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter-Morland, M. 2010. Questioning corporate codes of ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review 19 (3): 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanski, M.E. 2012. Forgiveness and reconciliation in the workplace: A multi-level perspective and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (3): 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presser, L., and E. Gaarder. 2000. Can restorative justice reduce battering? Some preliminary considerations. Social Justice 27 (1): 175–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullen, A., and C. Rhodes. 2015. Ethics, embodiment and organizations. Organization 22 (2): 159–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren, H., and B. Gray. 2009. Repairing relationship conflict: How violation types and culture influence the effectiveness of restoration rituals. Academy of Management Review 34 (1): 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. 2001. Corporate governance and the ethics of narcissus. Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1): 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. 2003. The manufacture of corporate social responsibility: Constructing corporate sensibility. Organization 10 (2): 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S.L. 1996. Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (4): 574–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S.L., and D.M. Rousseau. 1994. Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior 15 (3): 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D.E., and C.M. Bell. 2010. Extending the deontic model of justice: Moral self-regulation in third-party responses to injustice. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (1): 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saarinen, E. 2008. Philosophy for managers: Reflections of a practioner. Philosophy of Management 7(Supplement 1): 3-24.

  • Stone, M. 2002. Forgiveness in the workplace. Industrial and Commercial Training 34 (7): 278–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatransky, T. 2008. A reciprocal asymmetry? Levinas’s ethics reconsidered. Ethical Perspectives 15 (3): 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., and L. Walker. 1975. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, E.C., B.R. Dineen, and R.J. Lewicki. 2004. The road to reconciliation: Antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. Journal of Management 30 (2): 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L.K. 1992. The social effects of punishment in organizations: A justice perspective. Academy of Management Review 17 (4): 647–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buren, H.J., III. 2008. Fairness and the main management theories of the twentieth century: A historical review, 1900-1965. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (3): 633–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M.U. 2006. Moral repair. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, M., T.G. Okimoto, N.T. Feather, and M.J. Platow. 2008. Retributive and restorative justice. Law and Human Behavior 32 (5): 375–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoghbi-Manriqe-de-Lara, P. 2010. Do unfair procedures predict employees’ ethical behavior by deactivating formal regulations? Journal of Business Ethics 94 (3): 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Economics and Law, Kore University of Enna, Cittadella Universitaria, 94100, Enna, Italy

    Guglielmo Faldetta

Authors
  1. Guglielmo Faldetta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guglielmo Faldetta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faldetta, G. When Relationships are Broken: Restorative Justice under a Levinasian Approach. Philosophy of Management 18, 55–69 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-018-0094-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-018-0094-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation