Abstract
This paper develops a critique of the concept of ‘ethical identity’ as this has been used recently to distinguish between ‘cynical’ and ‘authentic’ forms of corporate responsibility. Taking as our starting point Levinas’ demanding view of responsibility as ‘following the assignation of responsibility for my neighbour’, we use a case study of a packaging company—PackCo—to argue that a concern with being seen and/or seeing oneself as responsible should not be confused with actual responsibility. Our analysis of the case points first to the allure of programmes of strategic corporate responsibility and the ways in which, through identification, they can provide a tacit form of moral sanction to managers in their aggressive pursuit of profit. It then contrasts the responses of different managers to negative staff feedback to illustrate the difference between managers’ attempts to defend their identity of being ‘responsible’ managers, and responsible conduct itself. The paper concludes that a potent danger of programmes of corporate responsibility is that they allow managers to deceive not just others, but also themselves in relation to the exercise of responsibility.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing critical management research. London: Sage.
Baker, M. (2010). Re-conceiving managerial capture. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23(7), 847–867.
Bauman, Z. (1993). Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Berrone, P., Surroca, J., & Tribó, J. A. (2007). Corporate ethical identity as a determinant of firm performance: A test of the mediating role of stakeholder satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 35–53.
Bevan, D., & Corvellec, H. (2007). The impossibility of corporate ethics: For a Levinasian approach to managerial ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(3), 208–219.
Butler, J. (2005). Giving an account of oneself’. New York: Fordham University Press.
Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663–680.
Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2007). Business ethics as practice. British Journal of Management, 18, 107–122.
Croft, N. (2005). Authentic business: How to create and run your perfect business. Chichester: Capstone.
Donaldson, T. (1994). When integration fails: The logic of prescription and description in business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2), 157–169.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65.
Duchon, D., & Drake, B. (2009). Organizational Narcissism and virtuous behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(3), 301–308.
Faÿ, E. (2008). Derision and management. Organization, 15(6), 831–850.
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, A. (1977). Responsible autonomy versus direct control over the labour process. Capital & Class, 1, 43–57.
Fukukawa, K., Balmer, J. M. T., & Gray, E. R. (2007). Mapping the interface between corporate identity, ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 1–5.
Halford, S., & Leonard, P. (2005). Place, space and time: Contextualizing workplace subjectivities. Organization Studies, 27(5), 657–676.
Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2007). Exploring the ethical identity of Islamic banks via communication in annual reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 97–116.
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.
Hine, J. H. A. S., & Preuss, L. (2009). “Society is out there, organisation is in here”: On the perceptions of corporate social responsibility held by different managerial groups. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 381–393.
Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14(2), 8–21.
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404.
Jones, C. (2007). Editorial introduction. Business Ethics: A European Review, 16(3), 196–202.
Keating, J. (1995). A framework for classifying and evaluating the theoretical contributions of case research in management accounting. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7(Fall), 66–86.
Kornberger, M., & Brown, A. D. (2007). Ethics’ as a discursive resource for identity work. Human Relations, 60(3), 497–518.
Levinas, E. (1991). Otherwise than being or beyond essence. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publications.
Loacker, B., & Muhr, S. (2009). How can I become a responsible subject? Towards a practice-based ethics of responsiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 265–277.
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.
O’Dwyer, B. (2003). Conceptions of corporate social responsibility: The nature of managerial capture. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(4), 523–557.
Ogden, S., Glaister, K. W., & Marginson, D. (2006). Empowerment and accountability: Evidence from the UK privatized water industry. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 521–555.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80, 56–68.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92.
Roberts, J. (2001). Corporate governance and the ethics of Narcissus. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11, 109–127.
Roberts, J. (2003). The manufacture of corporate social responsibility: Constructing corporate sensibility. Organization, 10, 249–265.
Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534–559.
Schearer, T. (2002). Ethics and accountability: From the for-itself to the for-the-other. accounting. Organizations and Society, 27(6), 541–573.
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096–1120.
Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 729–753.
Ten Bos, R., & Willmott, H. (2001). Towards a post-dualistic business ethics; interweaving reason and emotion in working life. Journal of Management Studies, 38(6), 769–793.
Verbos, A. K., Gerard, J. A., Forshey, P. R., Harding, C. S., & Miller, J. S. (2007). The positive ethical organization: Enacting a living code of ethics and ethical organizational identity. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 17–33.
Watson, T. (2003). Ethical choice in managerial work: The scope for moral choices in an ethically irrational world. Human Relations, 56(2), 167–185.
Weaver, G. R., & Trevino, L. K. (1994). Normative and empirical business ethics: Separation, marriage of convenience, or marriage of necessity? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 129–143.
Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K., & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Integrated and decoupled corporate social performance: Management commitments, external pressures, and corporate ethics practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 539–552.
Werhane, P. H. (1994). The normative/descriptive distinction in methodologies of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 175–180.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baker, M., Roberts, J. All in the Mind? Ethical Identity and the Allure of Corporate Responsibility. J Bus Ethics 101 (Suppl 1), 5–15 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1171-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1171-8