Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Empirical Study of Room Acoustic Conditions and Neurophysiologic Strain in Staff Working in Special Open-Plan Bank Offices

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acoustics Australia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Noise in open-plan offices induces psychological stress and fatigue in staff. Focusing on workstations and noise exposure, this study investigated acoustic conditions in special open-plan offices and their relationship with neurophysiologic strain. Twenty banks and 104 participants were randomly selected. Acoustic properties of banks and workstation partitions were assessed using the ISO criteria and speech transmission index (STI). Equivalent noise level (LAeq) of the staff was measured in three 30-min intervals, and skin conductance level (SCL) and respiratory rate (RR) of staff were assessed in three 5-min intervals at the beginning, in the middle, and at the end of the work hours. The intelligibility of speech between staff workstations (SW) was better than that between staff and clients (S&C). The observed condition should be reversed to ensure speech privacy for the staff and speech intelligibility between the staff and clients. The findings indicated that with increasing LAeq of the staff, the SCL and RR, i.e., the stress of staff increased too. Yet, the staff with more work experience showed a lower increase in SCL. The correlation between STI and staff strain was not statistically significant; however, with increasing STI between SW and with decreasing STI between S&C, the staff strain increased. With increasing noise exposure, psychological stress of the staff increased too. Because of the acoustic condition and partitions used in the banks, the acoustic comfort of staff was not desirable. Since many other banks use such partitions, any improvement in partitions between workstations can enhance acoustic comfort in the banks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4: a
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pierrette, M., Parizet, E., Chevret, P., Chatillon, J.: Noise effect on comfort in open-space offices: development of an assessment questionnaire. Ergonomics 58(1), 96–106 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brookes, M.J., Kaplan, A.: The office environment: space planning and affective behavior. Hum. Factors 14(5), 373–391 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Golmohammadi, R., Aliabadi, M., Nezami, T.: An experimental study of acoustic comfort in open space banks based on speech intelligibility and noise annoyance measures. Arch. Acoust. 42(2), 333–345 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hedge, A.: The open-plan office: a systematic investigation of employee reactions to their work environment. Environ. Behav. 14(5), 519–542 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sundstrom, E., Burt, R.E., Kamp, D.: Privacy at work: architectural correlates of job satisfaction and job performance. Acad. Manag. J. 23(1), 101–117 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Babisch, W.: Stress hormones in the research on cardiovascular effects of noise. Noise Health 5(18), 1 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, P.J., Lee, B.K., Jeon, J.Y., Zhang, M., Kang, J.: Impact of noise on self-rated job satisfaction and health in open-plan offices: a structural equation modelling approach. Ergonomics 59(2), 222–234 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, A.: A review of the non-auditory effects of noise on health. Work Stress 5(1), 49–62 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sundstrom, E., Town, J.P., Rice, R.W., Osborn, D.P., Brill, M.: Office noise, satisfaction, and performance. Environ. Behav. 26(2), 195–222 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Darvishi, E., Maleki, A., Giahi, O., Akbarzadeh, A.: Subjective mental workload and its correlation with musculoskeletal disorders in bank staff. J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. 39(6), 420–426 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. IEC 60268-16:2011. Sound system equipment—part 16: objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission index

  12. Notbohm, G., Schmook, R., Schwarze, S., Angerer, P.: Patterns of physiological and affective responses to vehicle pass-by noises. Noise Health 15(66), 355 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Galbrun, L., Kitapci, K.: Accuracy of speech transmission index predictions based on the reverberation time and signal-to-noise ratio. Appl. Acoust. 81, 1–14 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haapakangas, A., Hongisto, V., Hyönä, J., Kokko, J., Keränen, J.: Effects of unattended speech on performance and subjective distraction: the role of acoustic design in open-plan offices. Appl. Acoust. 86, 1–16 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keränen, J., Hongisto, V.: Prediction of the spatial decay of speech in open-plan offices. Appl. Acoust. 74(12), 1315–1325 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Passero, C.R.M., Zannin, P.H.T.: Acoustic evaluation and adjustment of an open-plan office through architectural design and noise control. Appl. Ergon. 43(6), 1066–1071 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Evans, G.W., Johnson, D.: Stress and open-office noise. J. Appl. Psychol. 85(5), 779 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Storm, H., Myre, K., Rostrup, M., Stokland, O., Lien, M., Raeder, J.: Skin conductance correlates with perioperative stress. Acta Anaesth. Scand. 46(7), 887–895 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sequeira, H., Hot, P., Silvert, L., Delplanque, S.: Electrical autonomic correlates of emotion. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 71(1), 50–56 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Critchley, H.D.: Electrodermal responses: what happens in the brain. Neuroscientist 8(2), 132–142 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Timmons, B.H., Ley, R.: Behavioral and Psychological Approaches to Breathing Disorders. Springer, Berlin (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Bailón, R., Sornmo, L., Laguna, P.: A robust method for ECG-based estimation of the respiratory frequency during stress testing. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53(7), 1273–1285 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Günther, A.: Skin conductance variability and stressful exposures in critical care. PhD Thesis. Stockholm University (2016)

  24. Holube, I., Haeder, K., Imbery, C., Weber, R.: Subjective listening effort and electrodermal activity in listening situations with reverberation and noise. Trends Hear. 20, 1–15 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mackersie, C.L., Calderon-Moultrie, N.: Autonomic nervous system reactivity during speech repetition tasks: heart rate variability and skin conductance. Ear Hear. 37, 118S–125S (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Masaoka, Y., Homma, I.: Anxiety and respiratory patterns: their relationship during mental stress and physical load. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 27(2), 153–159 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aliabadi, M., Golmohammadi, R., Ohadi, A., Mansoorizadeh, M., Khotanlou, H., Sarrafzadeh, M.S.: Development of an empirical acoustic model for predicting reverberation time in typical industrial workrooms using artificial neural networks. Acta Acust. United Acust. 100(6), 1090–1097 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Passero, C.R.M., Zannin, P.H.T.: Statistical comparison of reverberation times measured by the integrated impulse response and interrupted noise methods, computationally simulated with ODEON software, and calculated by Sabine, Eyring and Arau-Puchades’ formulas. Appl. Acoust. 71(12), 1204–1210 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. ISO 3382-3:2012. Acoustics—measurement of room acoustic parameters—part 3: open plan offices

  30. Cabrera, D., Lee, D., Leembruggen, G., Jimenez, D.: Increasing robustness in the calculation of the speech transmission index from impulse responses. Build. Acoust. 21(3), 181–198 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cabrera, D., Yadav, M., Protheroe, D.: Critical methodological assessment of the distraction distance used for evaluating room acoustic quality of open-plan offices. Appl. Acoust. 140, 132–142 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. NF S31-199: 2016. Acoustics—acoustic performance of open office spaces. In. French

  33. Pawlaczyk-łuszczyńska, M., Dudarewicz, A., Waszkowska, M., Szymczak, W., Kameduła, M., Śliwińska-Kowalska, M.: Does low frequency noise at modarate levels influence human mental performance? J Low Freq Noise Vib Active Control 24(1), 25–42 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Edmonds, W.A., Tenenbaum, G.: Case Studies in Applied Psychophysiology: Neurofeedback and Biofeedback Treatments for Advances in Human Performance. Wiley, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Potter, R.F., Bolls, P.: Psychophysiological Measurement and Meaning: Cognitive and Emotional Processing of Media. Routledge, Abingdon (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Sokhadze, E.M.: Effects of music on the recovery of autonomic and electrocortical activity after stress induced by aversive visual stimuli. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 32(1), 31–50 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gholami, T., Piran Veyseh, P., Aliabadi, M., Farhadian, M.: Evaluation of noise pollution and its effects on subjective fatigue of staffs in the governmental banks of Hamadan city. IOH 11(5), 65–73 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ebissou, A., Parizet, E., Chevret, P.: Use of the speech transmission index for the assessment of sound annoyance in open-plan offices. Appl. Acoust. 88, 90–95 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Weinzierl, S., Vorländer, M.: Room acoustical parameters as predictors of room acoustical impression: what do we know and what would we like to know? Acoust. Aust. 43(1), 41–48 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Seddigh, A., Berntson, E., Jönsson, F., Danielson, C.B., Westerlund, H.: The effect of noise absorption variation in open-plan offices: a field study with a cross-over design. J. Environ. Psychol. 44, 34–44 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Hamadan University of Medical Sciences for the financial support (Grant Number: 9511267308). Additionally, the authors thank the administrative and staff of Bank Melli Iran for their contribution. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee for Research in Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center of Excellence for Occupational Health, School of Public Health and Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 65175-4171, Hamadan, Iran

    Masoud Shafiee Motlagh & Rostam Golmohammadi

  2. Center of Excellence for Occupational Health, Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

    Mohsen Aliabadi

  3. Modeling of Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center & Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

    Javad Faradmal

  4. Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

    Akram Ranjbar

Authors
  1. Masoud Shafiee Motlagh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rostam Golmohammadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohsen Aliabadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Javad Faradmal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Akram Ranjbar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rostam Golmohammadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shafiee Motlagh, M., Golmohammadi, R., Aliabadi, M. et al. Empirical Study of Room Acoustic Conditions and Neurophysiologic Strain in Staff Working in Special Open-Plan Bank Offices. Acoust Aust 46, 329–338 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40857-018-0143-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40857-018-0143-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation