Abstract
For over a decade, researchers have been concerned about variable misconceptions within teaching and learning computer programming. Few studies exist to explore this concern in-depth from a pre-service teacher’s perspective. Importantly, the identification of pre-service teachers’ misconceptions in computer programming may significantly impact teaching and learning since it provides remedies to minimize or prevent effects on students. This study examines variable misconceptions of computer science pre-service teachers in Thailand and the effects of different computer-programming preferences on variable misconceptions. This study used a quantitative research method to examine a Thai sample of 151 computer science pre-service teachers with different preferences of programming languages. In this study, the pre-service teachers were asked to evaluate the provided programming tasks relating to variables. The Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests were performed to compare the computer-programming preferences between the groups. The findings of this study slightly reveal that the computer programming pre-service teachers have misconceptions about variables. The pre-service teachers in Logo and Scratch groups have similarly observed misconceptions. The Python group, however, is better at interpreting the misconceptions about variables. A design of pre-service teacher education activities to tackle variable misconceptions in the K-12 computer programming curriculum will be suggested according to the findings of this study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amiri, F. (2000). IT-literacy for language teachers: Should it include computer programming? System, 28(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00061-5
Bayman, P., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). A diagnosis of beginning programmers’ misconceptions of BASIC programming statements. Communications of the ACM, 26(9), 677–679. https://doi.org/10.1145/358172.358408
Bean, N., Weese, J., Feldhausen, R., & Bell, R. S. (2015). Starting from scratch: Developing a pre-service teacher training program in computational thinking. Proceedings—Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2015.7344237
Bers, M. U. (2019). Coding as another language: A pedagogical approach for teaching computer science in early childhood. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(4), 499–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00147-3
Bers, M. U., & Sullivan, A. (2019). Computer science education in early childhood: The case of scratchjr. Journal of Information Technology: Education Innovations in Practice, 18, 113–138. https://doi.org/10.28945/443710.28945/4437
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Bruner, J. S. (1977). The process of education. Harvard University Press.
Chang, C. Y., Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Trends and research issues of mobile learning studies in nursing education: A review of academic publications from 1971 to 2016. Computers and Education, 116, 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.001
Chiu, H. S. (2019). Dataset of mobile learning effectiveness on learning Computer Programming in Community College. Data in Brief, 26, 104525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104525
Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers and Education, 59(2), 661–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004
Dağ, F. (2019). Prepare pre-service teachers to teach computer programming skills at K-12 level: experiences in a course. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(2), 277–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00137-5
Dehnadi, S. (2006, September 7). Testing Programming Aptitude, Proceedings of the PPIG 18th Annual Workshop. Retrieved May 1, 2021, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228870259
Dehnadi, S. (2009). A cognitive study of learning to program in introductory programming courses [Doctoral dissertation, Middlesex University]. MDX eprints. http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/6274
Durak, H. Y. (2020). Modeling different variables in learning basic concepts of programming in flipped classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 160–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119827956
Erümit, A. K. (2020). Effects of different teaching approaches on programming skills. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10010-8
Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers and Education, 63, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016
Gomes, A., & Mendes, A. J. (2007, September 3–7). Learning to program - difficulties and solutions. Academic Conference Paper Engineering Education - ICEE 2007. Retrieved May 2, 2021 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228328491
Grover, S., & Basu, S. (2017). Measuring student learning in introductory block-based programming: Examining misconceptions of loops, variables, and Boolean logic. Proceedings of the Conference on Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education. Retrieved on May 2, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017723
Grover, S., Jackiw, N., & Lundh, P. (2019). Concepts before coding: Non-programming interactives to advance learning of introductory programming concepts in middle school. Computer Science Education, 29(2–3), 106–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2019.1568955
Hahn, J. H., Mentz, E., & Meyer, L. (2012). Information technology students’ changing perceptions of assessment strategies during pair programming. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2012.10740741
Jiang, B., & Li, Z. (2021). Effect of Scratch on computational thinking skills of Chinese primary school students. Journal of Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00190-z
Kwon, K. (2017). Novice programmer’s misconception of programming reflected on problem-solving plans. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 1(4), 14–24.
Ma, L. (2007). Investigating and improving novice programmers’ mental models of programming concepts. Semantic Scholar. Retrieved May 2, 2021, from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3c8e/fb0c95325ac2f6bb38bd3d56fdbe900e4892.pdf
Menekse, M. (2015). Computer science teacher professional development in the United States: A review of studies published between 2004 and 2014. Computer Science Education, 25(4), 325–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2015.1111645.
Ministry of Education Thailand. (2018). Computing Science Teacher Guide. The Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. Retrieved May 1, 2021, from https://oho.ipst.ac.th/?ddownload=3549
Ngee, P., Lau, K., Lau, S. H., Hong, K. S., Usop, H., Journal, S., Learning, A., Ngee, P., Lau, K., Lau, S. H., Hong, K. S., & Usop, H. (2011). International Forum of Educational Technology & Society Guessing Partial Knowledge, and Misconceptions in Multiple-Choice Tests. International Forum of Educational Technology & Society Guessing, Partial Knowledge, and Misconceptions, 14(4), 99–110.
Passey, D. (2017). Computer science (CS) in the compulsory education curriculum: Implications for future research. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9475-z
Plass, D. (2015). Identifying and addressing common programming misconceptions with variables (part 1). University of Twente. Retrieved May 2, 2021, from https://essay.utwente.nl/70455
Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533
Prensky, M. (2001). The games generations: How learners have changed. Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 1–26.
Qian, M., & Clark, K. R. (2016). Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.023
Rich, P., & Hodges, C. B. (2017). Emerging research, practice, and policy on computational thinking. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1
Shaffer, D. W., Squire, K. R., Halverson, R., & Gee, J. P. (2005). Video games and the future of learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(2), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700205
Shi, N., Cui, W., Zhang, P., & Sun, X. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness roles of variables in the novice programmers learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(2), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117707312
Sorva, J. (2012). Visual program simulation in introductory programming education. Aalto Univ.
Statter, D., & Armoni, M. (2020). Teaching abstraction in computer science to 7th grade students. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 20(1), 8–837. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372143
Stefik, A., & Siebert, S. (2013). An empirical investigation into programming language syntax. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 13(4), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/2534973
Strawhacker, A., Lee, M., & Bers, M. U. (2018). Teaching tools, teachers’ rules: Exploring the impact of teaching styles on young children’s programming knowledge in ScratchJr. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28, 347–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9400-9
Tan, K. C. D., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2002). Development and application of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students’ understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10023
Taspinar, B., Schmidt, W., & Schuhbauer, H. (2016). Gamification in education: A board game approach to knowledge acquisition. Procedia Computer Science, 99, 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.104
Yadav, A., Stephenson, C., & Hong, H. (2017). Computational thinking for teacher education. Communications of the ACM, 60(4), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2994591
Yadav, A., Zhou, N., Mayfield, C., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2011). Introducing computational thinking in education courses. SIGCSE’11—Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Retrieved May 2, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1145/1953163.1953297
Žanko, Ž, Mladenović, M., & Boljat, I. (2018). Misconceptions about variables at the K-12 level. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 1251–1268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9824-1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Changpetch, C., Panjaburee, P. & Srisawasdi, N. A comparison of pre-service teachers’ variable misconceptions in various computer-programming preferences: findings to teacher education course. J. Comput. Educ. 9, 149–172 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00200-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00200-0