Abstract
The three Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania make for interesting comparative case studies in the rise of contemporary populism in Europe. All three countries share a similar modern history, democratic political system, level of economic development and are in the same western-oriented regional clubs (NATO, European Union, OSCE, European Council and, in the case of Estonia and Latvia, OECD, etc.). However, they do differ in the extent to which populism has played a role in their national politics. Populism has played a marginal role in Estonian politics, but has long been central to the Latvian party system and influential in Lithuanian politics. This article tackles two key issues in the study of populism. First, it focuses on political party institutionalisation as the key variable in explaining the differing impact of populist political parties across the Baltic states. It examines and explains the higher turnover of political party creation and destruction in Latvia and, to a lesser extent, Lithuania and argues that institutions—and particularly the laws that frame party organisations and participation in elections—create political opportunities for populist parties. The second part of the paper considers the different types of populist parties to have emerged in the Baltic states in recent decades. While previous studies of populism in the Baltic states (such as Auers and Kasekamp in J Contemp Eur Stud 17(2):241–254, 2009; Auers and Kasekamp, in: Wodak et al (eds) Right wing populism across/beyond Europe, Bloomsbury Academic Press, London 2013) have explicitly focused on Radical Right Populist parties, this article additionally identifies a number of parties in the region that are not explicitly radical right, but are certainly populist.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
With this legislation Latvia became the last post-communist state in the European Union to adopt state financing of parties.
References
Auers, D. 2002/2003. he 2002 Latvian election: A new era? East European Constitutional Review. 11(4)/12(1): 106–110.
Auers, D. 2015. The comparative government and politics of the Baltic states. In Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in the 21st century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Auers, D., and A. Kasekamp. 2009. Explaining the electoral failure of extreme-right parties in Estonia and Latvia. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 17(2): 241–254.
Auers, D., and A. Kasekamp. 2013. Comparing radical right populism in Estonia and Latvia. In Right wing populism across/beyond Europe, ed. R. Wodak et al. London: Bloomsbury Academic Press.
Baltic Voices. 2017. Baltic barometers 1–6. www.balticvoices.org. Accessed 15 February 2018.
Bertoa, F.C., and M. Spirova. 2013. Get a subsidy or perish! Public funding and party survival in Eastern Europe. In The legal regulation of political parties. Working paper No. 29.
Caramani, D., and I. van Biezen. 2007. Cleavage structuring in Western vs. Central and Eastern Europe: State formation, nation-building and economic modernisation. Presented at ECPR Joint Sessions of workshop on 7-12 May, Helsinki.
Duvold, K., and M. Jurkynas. 2013. Lithuania. In The handbook of political change in Eastern Europe. 3rd ed, ed. S. Berglund, J. Ekman, K. Deegan-Krause, and T. Knutsen, 126–166. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Eurobarometer. http://ec.europa.eu/echo/eurobarometer_en. Accessed 15 February 2018.
Eurostat. 2017. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Accessed 15 February 2018.
Gallagher, M. 2017. Election indices dataset at: http://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/staff/michael_gallagher/ElSystems/index.php. Accessed 15 February 2018.
Kasekamp, A. 2010. A history of the Baltic states. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Laakso, M., and R. Taagepera. 1979. Effective’ number of parties: a measure with application to west Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12(1): 3–27.
Lewis, P. 2006. Party systems in post-communist Central Europe: Patterns of stability and consolidation. Democratization 13(4): 562–583.
Mežs, I., E. Bunkše, and K. Rasa. 1994. The ethno-demographic status of the Baltic states. GeoJournal 33(1): 9–25.
Mudde, C. 2004. The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39(4): 542–563.
Mudde, C. 2007. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mudde, C. 2010. The populist radical right: A pathological normalcy. West European Politics 33(6): 1167–1186.
Order and Justice Party. 2008. Party programme for 2008 seimas election. www.tvarka.lt. Accessed 15 February 2018.
Pedersen, M.N. 1979. The dynamics of European party systems: Changing patterns of electoral volatility. European Journal of Political Research 7(1): 1–26.
Pettai, V., D. Auers, and A. Ramonaite. 2011. Political development. In Estonian human development report 2010/2011: Baltic way(s) of development twenty years on, ed. M. Lauristin, 144–164. Tallinn: Estonian Cooperation Assembly.
Powell, E.N., and J.A. Tucker. 2014. Revisiting electoral volatility in post-communist countries: New data, new results, and new approaches. British Journal of Political Science 44: 123–147.
Purs, A. 2012. Baltic facades. London: Reaktion Books.
Saarts, T. 2011. Comparative party system analysis in central and eastern Europe: The case of the Baltic states. Studies of Transition States and Societies 3(3): 83–104.
Schmitter, P.C. 1999. Critical reflections on the functions of political parties and their performance in neo-democracies. In Demokratie in Ost und West. Festschrift fur Klaus von Beyme, ed. W. Merkel and A. Busch, 475–495. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Sikk, A. 2005. How unstable? Volatility and the genuinely new parties in Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research 44: 391–412.
Sikk, A. 2006. From private organizations to democratic infrastructure: Political parties and the state in Estonia. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 22(3): 341–361.
Stanley, B. 2008. The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies 13(1): 95–110.
Tavits, M. 2008. On the linkage between electoral volatility and party system instability in central and eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research 47(5): 537–555.
UNDP. 2016. Human development report 2016.In Human development for everyone. New York: UNDP. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2016_human_development_report.pdf. Accessed 15 February 2018.
van Biezen, I., P. Mair, and T. Poguntke. 2012. Going, going, … gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research 51: 24–56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Auers, D. Populism and Political Party Institutionalisation in the Three Baltic States of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Fudan J. Hum. Soc. Sci. 11, 341–355 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-018-0231-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-018-0231-1