Skip to main content
Log in

On the Disruptive Effects of Behavior Analysis on Behavior Analysis: The High Cost of Keeping Out Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Training

  • SI: Acceptance and Commitment Training in Behavior Analysis
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

ACT is entering its 40th year of development. Despite its undeniable historical origins in behavior analysis, extensive basis in behavior analytic research, and now enormous body of empirical research supporting its basic claims, some are still arguing that ACT is not legitimately part of behavior analysis. We agree with the target article that it is. We argue, however, that critics are right to feel that ACT will disrupt the field. It will do so not because of ACT per se, but because it brings relational frame theory (RFT) in with it and vice versa, and relational operants operate on other behavioral processes. This empirically established effect means that the vast literature on direct contingency control will need to be reexamined piece by piece while considering relational learning abilities. Such an agenda is exciting, but it is also daunting and disorienting. For behavior analysis to reject either ACT or RFT, both must be rejected. That appears to be the only way to avoid the coming disruption, but the cost would be in the distortion of the field itself that would result. Sometime the products of a scientific field require a fundamental rethinking of that field. In our view, that is the situation behavior analysis now faces. It is a kind of test, and we do not yet know if behavior analysis will pass it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., & Harte, C. (2022). Relational frame theory 20 years on: The Odysseus voyage and beyond. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 117(2), 240–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belisle, J., & Dixon, M. R. (2020a). Relational density theory: Nonlinearity of equivalence relating examined through higher-order volumetric-mass-density. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 43(2), 259–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belisle, J., & Dixon, M. R. (2020b). An exploratory analysis of relational density theory: Relational resistance and gravity. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 16, 80–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belisle, J., & Dixon, M. R. (2022). Relational behavior and ACT: A dynamic relationship. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15(1), 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belisle, J., Stanley, C. R., & Dixon, M. R. (2017). The relationship between derived mutually entailed relations and the function of challenging behavior in children with autism: Comparing the PEAK-E-PA and the QABF. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6(3), 298–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cihon, J. H., Ferguson, J. L., Leaf, J. B., Milne, C. M., Leaf, R., & McEachin, J. (2021). Acceptance and commitment training: A review of the research. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 22(2), 275–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cihon, J. H., Schlinger, H. D., Ferguson, J. L., Leaf, J. B., & Milne, C. (2022). Is ACTraining behavior analytic? A review of Tarbox et al. (2020). Behavior Analysis in Practice. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-022-00680-1

  • Colbert, D., Tyndall, I., Roche, B., & Cassidy, S. (2018). Can SMART training really increase intelligence? A replication study. Journal of Behavioral Education, 27, 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9302-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, J., Lundgren, T., Plumb, J., & Stewart, I. (2009). The art and science of valuing in psychotherapy: Helping clients discover, explore, and commit to valued action using acceptance and commitment therapy. New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Small, S. L., & Rosales, R. (2007). Extended analysis of empirical citations with Skinner’s Verbal behavior: 1984–2004. The Behavior Analyst, 30, 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392155

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Stanley, C., Rowsey, K., Daar, J. H., & Szekely, S. (2015). Toward a behavior analysis of complex language for children with autism: Evaluating the relationship between PEAK and the VB-MAPP. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 27, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-014-9410-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., McKeel, A., Whiting, S., Speelman, R., Daar, J. H., & Rowsey, K. (2017). An internal and critical review of the PEAK relational training system for children with autism and related intellectual disabilities: 2014–2017. Behavior Analyst, 40, 493–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0119-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Rehfeldt, R. A., & Root, W. B. (2018a). Why we are still not acting to save the world: The upward challenge of a Post-Skinnerian behavior science. Perspectives of Behavioral Science, 41, 241–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-0162-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Wiggins, S., & Belisle, J. (2018b). The effectiveness of the peak relational training system and corresponding changes on the VB-MAPP for young adults with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51, 321–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Hayes, S. C., Stanley, C. R., Law, S., & Al-Nasser, T. (2020). Is acceptance and commitment training or therapy (ACT) a method that applied behavior analysts can and should use? The Psychological Record, 70, 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00436-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Paliliunas, D., Barron, B. F., Schmick, A. M., & Stanley, C. R. (2021). Randomized controlled trial evaluation of ABA content on IQ gains in children with autism. Journal of Behavioral Education, 30(3), 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-019-09344-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., Hayes, S. C., & Belisle, J. (in press). Acceptance and commitment therapy for behavior analysts: A practice guide from theory to treatment. Routledge.

  • Dougher, M. J., Hamilton, D. A., Fink, B. C., & Harrington, J. (2007). Transformation of the discriminative and eliciting functions of generalized relational stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 88(2), 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dymond, S., O’Hora, D., Whelan, R., & O’Donovan, A. (2006). Citation analysis of Skinner’s Verbal behavior: 1984–2004. The Behavior Analyst, 29, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilers, H. J., & Hayes, S. C. (2015). Exposure and response prevention therapy with cognitive defusion exercises to reduce repetitive and restrictive behaviors displayed by children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 19, 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enoch, M. R., & Dixon, M. R. (2017). The use of a child-based acceptance and commitment therapy curriculum to increase attention. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 39(3), 200–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foody, M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Luciano, C. (2013). An empirical investigation of hierarchical versus distinction relations in a self-based ACT exercise. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 13, 373–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foody, M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rai, L., & Luciano, C. (2015). An empirical investigation of the role of self, hierarchy, and distinction in a common ACT exercise. Psychological Record, 65, 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0103-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friman, P. C., Hayes, S. C., & Wilson, K. G. (1998). Why behavior analysts should study emotion: The example of anxiety. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1998.31-137

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gilsenan, C. M., Yi, Z., Hinman, J. M., Barron, B. F., & Dixon, M. R. (2022). Using relational training to improve performance during acceptance and commitment training sessions. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15(1), 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorham, M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Berens, N. (2009). Derived comparative and transitive relations in young children with and without autism. The Psychological Record, 59(2), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahs, A. D., Dixon, M. R., & Paliliunas, D. (2019). Randomized controlled trial of a brief acceptance and commitment training for parents of individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 12, 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (1982, October). Cognitive distancing and psychopathology. Presentation at Broughton Hospital, Morganton, NC.

  • Hayes, S. C. (1984). Making sense of spirituality. Behaviorism, 12, 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (1989a). Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1989.51-385

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (Ed.). (1989b). Rule governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Brownstein, A. J. (1986). Mentalism, behavior-behavior relations and a behavior analytic view of the purposes of science. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., & Reese, H. W. (1988). Finding the philosophical core: A review of Stephen C. Pepper's World hypotheses. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1988.50-97

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Contextual behavioral science: Creating a science more adequate to the challenge of the human condition. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 1, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2012.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Law, S., Assemi, K., Falletta-Cowden, N., Shamblin, M., Burleigh, K., Olla, R., Forman, M., & Smith, P. (2021). Relating is an operant: A fly over of 35 years of RFT research. Perspectivas em Analise do Comportamento, 12(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.18761/PAC.2021.v12.RFT.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Ciarrochi, J., Hofmann, S. G., Chin, F., & Sahdra, B. (2022). Evolving an idionomic approach to processes of change: Towards a unified personalized science of human improvement. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 156, 104-155.

  • Kirsten, E. B., & Stewart, I. (2022). Assessing the development of relational framing in young children. The Psychological Record, 72(2), 221–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishita, N., Ohtsuki, T., & Muto, T. (2012). Experimental analysis of the nature of cognitive defusion: Effect of contextual control over the transformation of stimulus function established by topographical features of equivalence class members. Japanese Journal of Behavior Therapy, 38, 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, M. E., Hildebrandt, M. J., Lillis, J., & Hayes, S. C. (2012). The impact of treatment components suggested by the psychological flexibility model: A meta-analysis of laboratory-based component studies. Behavior Therapy, 43(4), 741–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipkins, G., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of derived stimulus relations in an infant. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 201–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda, A., Hayes, S. C., Twohig, M. P., Drossel, C., Lillis, J., & Washio, Y. (2009). A parametric study of cognitive defusion and the believability and discomfort of negative self-relevant thoughts. Behavior Modification, 33, 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445508326259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • May, B. K., & St. Cyr, J. (2021). The impact of the PEAK curriculum on standardized measures of intelligence: A systems level randomized control trial. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 5, 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-021-00199-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, L., Stewart, I., & Almada, P. (2019). A contextual behavioral guide to the self: Theory and practice. New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoya-Rodríguez, M. M., Molina, F. J., & McHugh, L. (2017). A review of relational frame theory research into deictic relational responding. Psychological Record, 67, 569–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0216-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paliliunas, D., Belisle, J., & Dixon, M. R. (2018). A randomized control trial to evaluate the use of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) to increase academic performance and psychological flexibility in graduate students. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 11, 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-0252-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. C. (2004). Data in search of a principle: a review of relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81(2), 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. C. (2022, February 22). Closing remarks on relational frame theory. BFSkinner.org. https://community.bfskinner.org/s/article/Closing-Remarks-on-R-F-T. Accessed 1 Apr 2022

  • Pingo, J. C., Dixon, M. R., & Paliliunas, D. (2019). Intervention enhancing effects of acceptance and commitment training on performance feedback for direct support professional work performance, stress, and job satisfaction. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 13(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00333-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Quinones, J., & Hayes, S. C. (2014). Relational coherence in ambiguous and unambiguous relational networks. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeldt, R. A., & Root, S. L. (2005). Establishing derived requesting skills in adults with severe developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38(1), 101–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1972). The operational analysis of psychological terms. In: Cumulative record: A selection of papers. Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Original work published 1945)

  • Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, D. L., & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1991.56-519

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tarbox, J., Szabo, T. G., & Aclan, M. (2020). Acceptance and commitment training within the scope of practice of applied behavior analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, T. M., Hayes, S. C., & Capurro, P. (2011). Establishing a deictic relational repertoire in young children. The Psychological Record, 61(3), 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, R., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of same and opposite. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 82, 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2004.82-177

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. G., & DuFrene, T. (2009). The Hexaflex model and mindfulness from an ACT perspective. Mindfulness for two: An acceptance and commitment therapy approach to mindfulness in psychotherapy, 45–54. New Harbinger Publications.

  • Zettle, R. D., Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Biglan, T. (Eds.). (2016). The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science. Wiley/Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark R. Dixon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interests

Both authors declare no conflict of interests.

Consent to Participate

No participants were included in this conceptual article.

Ethics Approval

As a conceptual article, no institutional review occurred.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dixon, M.R., Hayes, S.C. On the Disruptive Effects of Behavior Analysis on Behavior Analysis: The High Cost of Keeping Out Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Training. Behav Analysis Practice (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-022-00742-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-022-00742-4

Keywords

Navigation