Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neurofeedback in the Treatment of Early Life Stress: a “Nudge” for the Nervous System?

  • Early Life Trauma (M Teicher, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

Early life stress has been shown to have profound effects on the developmental trajectories of individuals. Findings have implicated most major areas of the brain as being affected, and existing treatments have been limited in ameliorating symptoms. The purpose of this review is to focus on the development of the autonomic nervous system in concert with the brain.

Recent findings

We suggest that the majority of psychopathology related to early life stress represents an allostatic equilibrium achieved by the autonomic nervous system organizing around threat states. Recent findings in the field of neurofeedback implicate alpha waves as a potential key to helping treat individuals who have been affected by early life stress.

Summary

We conclude that alpha neurofeedback may represent a novel treatment approach to engender changes within the autonomic nervous system in helping to achieve a homeostatic equilibrium. Alpha downtrain neurofeedback may represent a “nudge” for a stuck nervous system that acts as a precursor to increase the efficacy of other training protocols and more traditional talk therapy techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

    ** The highlighted references provide evidence that alpha rhythms appear to be associated with organization and functioning of the default mode network. This is important because emerging research has shown that alpha downtrain neurofeedback can significantly change not only the alpha rhythms but also connectivity of the default mode network. Our suggestion is that neurofeedback may provide a unique means of regulating connectivity and functioning of large-scale networks in the brain which have been impacted by early life stress.

    1. Kaiser RH, et al. Childhood stress, grown-up brain networks: corticolimbic correlates of threat-related early life stress and adult stress response. Psychol Med. 2018;48(7):1157–66.

      Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    2. Teicher MH, et al. The effects of childhood maltreatment on brain structure, function and connectivity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016;17(10):652–66.

      Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    3. Teicher MH, Samson JA. Annual research review: enduring neurobiological effects of childhood abuse and neglect. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016;57(3):241–66.

      Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    4. Hughes K, et al. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(8):e356–66.

      Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    5. Balbernie R. Circuits and circumstances: the neurobiological consequences of early relationship experiences and how they shape later behaviour. J Child Psychother. 2001;27(3):237–55.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    6. Ohashi K, et al. Susceptibility or resilience to maltreatment can be explained by specific differences in brain network architecture. Biol Psychiatry. 2019;85(8):690–702.

      Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    7. Teicher MH, et al. Differential effects of childhood neglect and abuse during sensitive exposure periods on male and female hippocampus. Neuroimage. 2018;169:443–52.

      Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    8. Zhu J, et al. Association of prepubertal and postpubertal exposure to childhood maltreatment with adult amygdala function. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(8):843–53.

      Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    9. Yerkes RM, Dodson JD. The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Punishment: Issues and experiments. 1908:27–41.

    10. Cardinali DP. Autonomic nervous system: basic and clinical aspects. Springer; 2017.

    11. Ros T, et al. Neurofeedback tunes long-range temporal correlations in spontaneous brain activity. Cerebral Cortex. 2016.

    12. Porges SW. The polyvagal theory: neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation (Norton Series on Interpersonal Neurobiology). WW Norton & Company; 2011

    13. Kirschbaum C, et al. Sex-specific effects of social support on cortisol and subjective responses to acute psychological stress. Psychosom Med. 1995;57(1):23–31.

      Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    14. Uno D, Uchino BN, Smith TW. Relationship quality moderates the effect of social support given by close friends on cardiovascular reactivity in women. Int J Behav Med. 2002;9(3):243–62.

      Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    15. Hostinar CE, Sullivan RM, Gunnar MR. Psychobiological mechanisms underlying the social buffering of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical axis: A review of animal models and human studies across development. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(1):256.

      Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    16. Roelofs K. Freeze for action: neurobiological mechanisms in animal and human freezing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2017;372(1718):20160206.

      Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    17. Berger H. Über das elektroenkephalogramm des menschen. Archiv für psychiatrie und nervenkrankheiten. 1929;87(1):527–70.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    18. Kreezer G. The electro-encephalogram and its use in psychology. Am J Psychol. 1938;51(4):737–59.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    19. Sterman M, Macdonald L, Stone R. Biofeedback training of sensorimotor EEG rhythm in man-effects on epilepsy. in Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Elsevier SCI Ireland Ltd Customer Relations Manager, Bay 15, Shannon; 1975.

    20. Sterman M, MacDonald L, Stone R. EEG asymmetry and seizure modification following unilateral sensorimotor EEG biofeedback training. in Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Elsevier Ireland Ltd Elsevier House, Brookvale Plaza, East Park Shannon, CO; 1973.

    21. Sterman M, Macdonald L, Stone R. of the sensor/motor electroencephalogram rhythm in man: effects on epilepsy. Biofeedback and Self-control, 1971: p. 313.

    22. Othmer SF, Othmer S. Interhemispheric EEG training; clinical experience and conceptual models. In: Evans JR, editor. Handbook of neurofeedback: dynamics and clinical applications. New York: Haworth Medical Press; 2007. p. 109–36.

      Chapter  Google Scholar 

    23. Peniston EG, et al. EEG alpha-theta brainwave synchronization in Vietnam theater veterans with combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol abuse. Advances in Medical Psychotherapy. 1993;6:37–50.

    24. Peniston EG, Kulkosky PJ. Alpha-theta brainwave neurofeedback for Vietnam veterans with combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder. Medical Psychotherapy. 1991;4(1):47–60.

      Google Scholar 

    25. Peniston E, et al. EEG alpha-theta brainwave synchronization in Vietnam theater veterans with combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol abuse. Advances in Medical Psychotherapy. 1993;6(7):37–50.

      Google Scholar 

    26. Graap K, Freides D. Regarding the database for the Peniston alpha-theta EEG biofeedback protocol. Appl Psychophysiol Biof. 1998;23(4):265–72.

      Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

    27. Gapen M, et al. A pilot study of neurofeedback for chronic PTSD. Appl Psychophysiol Biof. 2016;41(3):251–61.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    28. van der Kolk BA, et al. A randomized controlled study of neurofeedback for chronic PTSD. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0166752.

      Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

    29. Rogel A, et al. The impact of neurofeedback training on children with developmental trauma: a randomized controlled study. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. Preprint. 2020 This is a recent finding of the efficacy of neurofeedback for treating complex PTSD in children.

    30. •• Nicholson AA, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of alpha-rhythm EEG neurofeedback in posttraumatic stress disorder: a preliminary investigation showing evidence of decreased PTSD symptoms and restored default mode and salience network connectivity using fMRI. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2020;28:102490 Alpha neurofeedback was associated with normalization of connectivity between the DMN and SN.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    31. Clancy K, et al. Restless ‘rest’: intrinsic sensory hyperactivity and disinhibition in post-traumatic stress disorder. Brain. 2017;140(7):2041–50.

      Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    32. Laufs H, et al. EEG-correlated fMRI of human alpha activity. Neuroimage. 2003;19(4):1463–76.

      Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    33. Veltmeyer MD, et al. Integrative assessment of brain and cognitive function in post-traumatic stress disorder. J Integr Neurosci. 2005;4(01):145–59.

      Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    34. Peterson A, et al. Resting-state neuroimaging studies: a new way of identifying differences and similarities among the anxiety disorders? Can J Psychiatr. 2014;59(6):294–300.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    35. Menon V. Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15:483–506.

      Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    36. Seeley WW, et al. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci. 2007;27(9):2349–56.

      Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    37. Patel R, et al. Neurocircuitry models of posttraumatic stress disorder and beyond: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36(9):2130–42.

      Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    38. Hayes JP, Hayes SM, Mikedis AM. Quantitative meta-analysis of neural activity in posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2012;2(1):9.

      Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    39. Lanius RA, et al. Restoring large-scale brain networks in PTSD and related disorders: a proposal for neuroscientifically-informed treatment interventions. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015;6(1):27313.

      Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    40. Greicius MD, et al. Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003;100(1):253–8.

      Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    41. Spreng RN, Mar RA, Kim AS. The common neural basis of autobiographical memory, prospection, navigation, theory of mind, and the default mode: a quantitative meta-analysis. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009;21(3):489–510.

      Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    42. Tursich M, et al. Distinct intrinsic network connectivity patterns of post-traumatic stress disorder symptom clusters. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015;132(1):29–38.

      Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    43. Rabellino D, et al. Intrinsic connectivity networks in post-traumatic stress disorder during sub-and supraliminal processing of threat-related stimuli. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015;132(5):365–78.

      Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    44. •• Nicholson AA, et al. Intrinsic connectivity network dynamics in PTSD during amygdala downregulation using real-time fMRI neurofeedback: a preliminary analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018;39(11):4258–75 This study provides preliminary evidence that neurofeedback can alter intrinsic connectivity dynamics in PTSD.

      Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    45. Bandler R, et al. Central circuits mediating patterned autonomic activity during active vs. passive emotional coping. Brain Res Bull. 2000;53(1):95–104.

      Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    46. Young CB, et al. Dynamic shifts in large-scale brain network balance as a function of arousal. J Neurosci. 2017;37(2):281–90.

      Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    47. Sridharan D, Levitin DJ, Menon V. A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105(34):12569–74.

      Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    48. Chang C, et al. EEG correlates of time-varying BOLD functional connectivity. Neuroimage. 2013;72:227–36.

      Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    49. •• Bowman AD, et al. Relationship between alpha rhythm and the default mode network: an EEG-fMRI study. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;34(6):527–33 This article provides evidence that alpha oscillations appear to be a biomarker for functioning of the default mode network.

      Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    50. •• Shtark MB, et al. Neuroimaging study of alpha and beta EEG biofeedback effects on neural networks. Appl Psychophysiol Biof. 2018;43(2):169–78 This study showed that alpha neurofeedback affected brain network connectivity.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    51. Kluetsch RC, et al. Plastic modulation of PTSD resting-state networks and subjective wellbeing by EEG neurofeedback. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2014;130(2):123–36.

      Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

    52. Nicholson AA, et al. Alpha oscillation neurofeedback modulates amygdala complex connectivity and arousal in posttraumatic stress disorder. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2016;12:506–16.

      Article  Google Scholar 

    53. Bassett DS, Khambhati AN. A network engineering perspective on probing and perturbing cognition with neurofeedback. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017;1396(1):126.

      Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

    Download references

    Author information

    Authors and Affiliations

    Authors

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Mark Gapen Ph.D./BCN.

    Additional information

    Publisher’s Note

    Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

    This article is part of the Topical Collection on Early Life Trauma

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Gapen, M., Guy, T. Neurofeedback in the Treatment of Early Life Stress: a “Nudge” for the Nervous System?. Curr Treat Options Psych 8, 77–94 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-021-00243-1

    Download citation

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-021-00243-1

    Keywords

    Navigation