Skip to main content
Log in

“Ocilion”

Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) 13 July 2023 – Case No. C-426/21; ECLI:EU:C:2023:564

  • Decision • Copyright Law
  • European Union
  • Published:
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript
  1. 1.

    Article 2 and Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as meaning that the exception to the exclusive right of authors and broadcasting organisations to authorise or prohibit the reproduction of protected works does not cover a service offered by an operator of retransmission of online television broadcasts to commercial customers allowing, on the basis of a cloud-hosting solution or based on the necessary hardware and software made available on premises, a continuous or one-off recording of those broadcasts, on the initiative of the end users of that service, where the copy made by the first of those users to have selected a broadcast is made available, by the operator, to an indeterminate number of users who wish to view the same content.

  2. 2.

    Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29 must be interpreted as meaning that the supply by an operator of retransmission of online television broadcasts to its commercial customer of the necessary hardware and software, including technical assistance, which enables that customer to allow its own customers to replay online television broadcasts, does not constitute a ‘communication to the public’ within the meaning of that provision, even if that operator is aware that its service may be used to access protected broadcasting content without the consent of the authors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Consortia

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Available at http://curia.europa.eu. Official wording of the Court.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ocilion IPTV Technologies GmbH v. Seven.One Entertainment Group GmbH and Puls 4 TV GmbH & Co. KG Directive 2001/29/EC, Arts. 3, 5(2)(b). “Ocilion”. IIC 55, 464–465 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-024-01430-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-024-01430-2

Keywords

Navigation