Skip to main content
Log in

“Multicaja”

Decision of the Supreme Court of Chile (Corte Suprema) 8 August 2022 – Case No. 82422-2021

  • Decision • Restraints of Competition
  • Chile
  • Published:
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Consortia

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Translated from the Spanish by Sarah Bowyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Organisation of Consumers and Users of Chile (Organización de Consumidores y Usuarios de Chile), IGT Global Solutions Corporation Chile (Sencillito), Unired S.A., Walmart Chile S.A., Compañía de Petróleos de Chile Copec S.A., Farmacias Ahumada S.A., the National Association of Consumers and Users of Chile (Corporación Nacional de Consumidores y Usuarios de Chile), the Chilean National Competition Authority (Fiscalía Nacional Económica) and Multicaja S.A. v. Chilean Competition Tribunal (Tribunal de Defensa de la Libre Competencia) Decree-Law No. 211, Arts. 5, 18, 31. “Multicaja”. IIC 54, 471–486 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01306-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01306-x

Keywords

Navigation