Article 2(b) and Article 3(2)(a) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which establishes, as regards the exploitation of audiovisual archives by a body set up for that purpose, a rebuttable presumption that the performer has authorised the fixation and exploitation of his performances, where that performer is involved in the recording of an audiovisual work so that it may be broadcast.
Article PDF
Author information
Consortia
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Available at http://curia.europa.eu.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Société de perception et de distribution des droits des artistes-interprètes de la musique et de la danse (Spedidam), PG, GF v. Institut national de l’audiovisuel Directive 2001/29/EC, Arts. 2(b), 3(2)(a). “Spedidam and Others”. IIC 51, 226 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-019-00905-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-019-00905-x