Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validating an Instrument for EFL Learners’ Sources of Self-Efficacy, Academic Self-Efficacy and the Relation to English Proficiency

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on self-efficacy has been a productive field while limited studies have explored language learners’ formation of academic self-efficacy. This quantitative study developed an instrument with two questionnaires for assessing English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ formation of self-efficacy and academic self-efficacy. It further investigated the complex relationship among learners’ sources of self-efficacy, academic self-efficacy and their English proficiency. The participants were 700 EFL learners at a comprehensive university in China, who took a compulsory language course for improving their overall English proficiency. The results validated the two questionnaires and further confirmed the correlations among the three constructs. It is very striking to see that the ‘social persuasion’ played the most significant and positive role for predicting learners’ academic self-efficacy and all aspects of English proficiency. Moreover, ‘physiological states’ were found as a negative predictor for explaining learners’ achievements in English listening and reading. The research highlights the importance of socio-cultural factors during learners’ formation of academic self-efficacy in China, particularly the significant roles played by the influential social agents. Implications are provided for reducing EFL learners’ physiological stress and sustaining their academic self-efficacy for improving their language proficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The CET Spoken English Test (CET-SET) is a national oral proficiency test for Chinese college students who are not English majors. It is organized twice a year and students who achieved qualified scores in the college English paper test, usually named CET for short, could participate in the spoken test.

References

  • Ahn, H. S., Usher, E. L., Butz, A., & Bong, M. (2016). Cultural differences in the understanding of modelling and feedback as sources of self-efficacy information. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 112–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, A. (2012). Predictive power of the sources of primary school students’ self-efficacy beliefs on their self-efficacy beliefs for learning and performance. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(3), 1915–1920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, L. (2005). Shaping the ideal child: Children and their primers in late imperial China. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, L., Millwater, J., & Hudson, P. (2013). Factors that influence Chinese TEFL academics’ research capacity building: An institutional case study. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(2), 119–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The excise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, K. (2010). Computer-assisted language learning (2nd ed.). London: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 485–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Y. G. (2014). Parental factors and early English education as a foreign language: a case study in Mainland China. Research Papers in Education, 29(4), 410–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Y. G. (2015). Parental factors in children’s motivation for learning English: a case in China. Research Papers in Education, 30(2), 164–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, A. (2008). Sources of listening anxiety in learning English as a foreign language. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106(1), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H-Y. (2007). The relationship between EFL learners’ self-efficacy beliefs and English performance. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.

  • Chen, J. A., & Usher, E. L. (2013). Profiles of the sources of science self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, J. M. (1997). A comparison of two multiple-choice test formats for assessing English structure competence. Foreign Language Annals, 30(1), 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z., & Chan, L. (2013). Motivation and vision: An analysis of future L2 self images, sensory styles, and imagery capacity across two target languages. Language Learning, 63, 437–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkhafaifi, H. (2005). Listening comprehension and anxiety in the Arabic language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 206–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X. (2008). You had to work hard ’Cause you didn’t know whether you were going to wear shoes or straw sandals! Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 8, 169–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X. S. (2012). Parental strategies in supporting Chinese children’s learning of English vocabulary. Research Papers in Education, 27(5), 581–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X. Y. (2015). The relationship between foreign language listening anxiety and learners’ performance. Proceedings of the Fourth Northeast Asia International Symposium on Language, Literature and Translation, 64–70.

  • Goh, C. C. M., & Hu, G. (2014). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language Awareness, 23(3), 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. J. (2006). A study of students’ metacognitive beliefs about foreign language study and their impact on learning. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 296–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Macaro, E. (2008). The role of metacognition in second/foreign language teaching and learning. Language Learning, 58(4), 747–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. H. (1969). Teaching English as a second language. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, L., & Dai, Y. (2006). A corpus-based investigation into the validity of the CET-SET group discussion. Language Testing, 23(3), 370–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, E., & Stephenson, J. (2012). Foreign language anxiety and oral exam performance: A replication of Phillips’s MLJ study. Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 170–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilleson, M. (1996). ‘I want to talk with them, but I don’t want them to hear’: An introspective study of second language anxiety in an English-medium school. In K. M. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom (pp. 248–277). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, E. K. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. A. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, P. P. H., & Kang, H. S. (2010). Attribution and self-efficacy and their interrelationship in the Korean EFL context. Language Learning, 60(3), 606–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, I.-S., & Kim, B.-G. (2016). A study on the teachers’ and parents’ perspectives of the reinforcement of multimedia language labs in secondary education. Secondary English Education, 9(1), 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D. H., Wang, C., Ahn, H. S., & Bong, M. (2015). English language learners’ self-efficacy profiles and relationship with self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 136–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissling, E. M., & O’Donnell, M. E. (2015). Increasing language awareness and self-efficacy of FL students using self-assessment and the ACTFL proficiency guidelines. Language Awareness, 24(4), 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. M. (2004). A cross-cultural investigation of the efficacy beliefs of South Asian immigrant and Anglo Canadian nonimmigrant early adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 731–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kormos, J. (2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 390–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. P., Lee, S. D., Liao, Y. L., & Wang, A. C. (2015). Effects of audio-visual aids on foreign language test anxiety, reading and listening comprehension, and retention in EFL learners. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 120(2), 576–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, T.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). An investigation of the sources of Taiwan high school students’ science learning self-efficacy. In Paper presented at the 2013 international conference for science educators and teachers (ISET), Thailand.

  • MacIntyre, P., & Gregersen, T. (2012). Affect: The role of language anxiety and other emotions in language learning. In Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice (pp. 103–118). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, N. (2009). A Guide du Routard simulation: Increasing self-efficacy in the standards through project-based learning. Foreign Language Annals, 42, 607–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, N. A., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2006). A re-evaluation of the role of anxiety: Self-efficacy, anxiety and their relation to reading and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 39(2), 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oettingen, D. (1995). Cross-cultural perspectives on self-efficacy. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 149–176). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oettingen, G., & Zosuls, K. M. (2006). Culture and self-efficacy in adolescents. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. V, pp. 245–265). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oller, J. W. (1979). Language tests at school. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pae, T.-I. (2013). Skill-based L2 anxieties revisited: Their intra-relations and the inter-relations with general foreign language anxiety. Applied Linguistics, 34(2), 232–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., Johnson, M. J., & Usher, E. L. (2007). Sources of writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary, middle, and high school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(1), 104–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem-solving—A path-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping, A. M., Baranovich, D. L., Manueli, M. K., & Siraj, S. (2015). Promoting self-regulation in vocabulary learning among Chinese EFL learners: A needs analysis. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(1), 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivate strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Centre for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruan, Z. (2014). Metacognitive awareness of EFL student writers in a Chinese ELT context. Language Awareness, 23(1–2), 76–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In K. R. Wenzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 35–53). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, J. P. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, W., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27, 78–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiriotakis, I. K., Vassilaki, E., Spantidakis, I., & Stavrou, N. A. M. (2017). The Examination of the effects of writing strategy-based procedural facilitative environments on students’ English foreign language writing anxiety levels. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 751–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Kim, D. H., Bai, R., & Hu, J. (2014). Psychometric properties of a self-efficacy scale for English language learners in China. System, 44, 24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Pape, S. J. (2007). A probe into three Chinese boys’ self-efficacy beliefs learning English as a second language. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 21, 364–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, L. J. (2006). A model of adaptive language learning. Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 297–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, L. (2011). College English writing affect: Self-efficacy and anxiety. System, 39(4), 510–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, C., & Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Language learning motivation in China: Results of a large-scale stratified survey. Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 495–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelenak, M. S. (2015). Measuring the sources of self-efficacy among secondary school music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62(4), 389–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, C., Lu, H., & Wang, H. (2015). The design and application of an online teaching and formative assessment system for an EFL course in China. Modern Educational Technology, 25(1), 72–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, C., Liang, J.-C., Yang, Y.-F., & Tsai, C.-C. (2016). The relationship between Chinese university students’ conceptions of language learning and their online self-regulation. System, 57, 66–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, N. A. (2014). Fostering self-regulated learning through the European language portfolio: An embedded mixed methods study. Modern Language Journal, 98(4), 921–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. J. (2006). Adolescents’ development of personal agency: the role of self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulatory skill. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 45–69). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to show our gratitude to all the reviewers and editors who have provided insightful comments and suggestions. The research is funded by the Humanities and Social Sciences Fund of Chinese Ministry of Education (Grant 16YJC740099, awarded to Chunping Zheng).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunping Zheng.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (docx 18 KB)

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

The Instrument for EFL Learners’ Academic Self-Efficacy and Its Sources

Questionnaire for Measuring the EFL Learners’ Self-Efficacy Sources

Factor 1: mastery experience (ME).

  1. 1.

    I do well on even the most difficult English assignments.

  2. 2.

    I do well on English assignments.

  3. 3.

    I have always been successful with English.

Factor 2: modelling experience from others (MO).

  1. 1.

    Seeing adults do well in English pushes me to do better.

  2. 2.

    When I see how my English teacher solves a problem, I can picture myself solving the problem in the same way.

  3. 3.

    When I see how another student solves problems in English, I can see myself solving the problem in the same way.

  4. 4.

    I have a good friend who performed very well in the English class and I admired him/her a lot.

Factor 3: self-modelling experience (SE).

  1. 1.

    I imagine myself working through challenging tasks in English successfully.

  2. 2.

    I want to learn English well.

  3. 3.

    I want to get good achievement in my EFL course.

Factor 4: social persuasion (SP).

  1. 1.

    People have told me that I have a talent in EFL courses.

  2. 2.

    Adults in my family have told me that I am a good English student.

  3. 3.

    Other students have told me that I’m good at learning English.

Factor 5: physical state (PS).

  1. 1.

    Just being in English class makes me feel stressed and nervous.

  2. 2.

    I start to feel stressed-out as soon as I begin to do my English assignments.

  3. 3.

    My mind goes blank and I am unable to think clearly when doing English assignments.

  4. 4.

    My whole body becomes tense when I have to learn English.

  5. 5.

    I always worry about my performance in English or related courses.

Questionnaire for Measuring EFL Learners’ Academic Self-Efficacy

  1. 1.

    I believe I will receive an excellent grade in this EFL course.

  2. 2.

    I’m confident I can understand the most complex material presented by the instructor in this EFL course.

  3. 3.

    I’m confident I can do an excellent job on the assignments and tests in this EFL course.

  4. 4.

    I’m certain I can master the materials being taught in this EFL course.

  5. 5.

    Considering the difficulty of this course, the teacher, and my skills, I think I will do well in this EFL course.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, C., Liang, JC. & Tsai, CC. Validating an Instrument for EFL Learners’ Sources of Self-Efficacy, Academic Self-Efficacy and the Relation to English Proficiency. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 26, 329–340 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0352-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0352-3

Keywords

Navigation