Skip to main content
Log in

Cholesterol Treatment Patterns and Cardiovascular Clinical Outcomes Associated with Colesevelam HCl and Ezetimibe

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Pharmaceuticals are commonly used to help at-risk patients reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in an effort to prevent atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Although both the cholesterol inhibitor ezetimibe and the newer generation bile acid sequestrant colesevelam hydrochloride (HCl) effectively reduce LDL-C levels in patients with hypercholesterolemia, real-world evidence based on clinical outcomes is lacking.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of healthcare insurance claims data from a large national healthcare payer was conducted to evaluate outcomes within 12 months among 2,067 patients with hypercholesterolemia after the initiation of treatment with colesevelam HCl (679 patients) as compared with ezetimibe (1,388 patients). Outcomes evaluated were (1) composite cardiovascular event which included myocardial infarction, stroke, angina, or revascularization and (2) macrovascular complication event which was a wider-encompassing measure that included all composite cardiovascular outcomes along with atherosclerosis, aneurysm, embolism, and peripheral vascular disease.

Results

An adjusted logistic regression model found lower odds of a composite cardiovascular event (odds ratio [OR] 0.54, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.30–0.97) within 12 months for subjects initiating treatment with colesevelam HCl compared with subjects initiating treatment with ezetimibe. The unadjusted OR was slightly lower (OR 0.52, 95 % CI 0.30–0.90). The odds ratio for the wider-encompassing macrovascular complication event occurring within 12 months of initiating treatment with colesevelam HCl or ezetimibe was not statistically significant (OR 0.821, 95 % CI 0.49–1.35).

Discussion

The evidence of lower risk for composite cardiovascular event rates for subjects treated with colesevelam HCl compared with those treated with ezetimibe suggests the potential need to consider risk of clinical outcomes, in addition to LDL-C levels, in real-world practice when choosing a pharmaceutical treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285(19):2486–97.

  2. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2560–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nelson K, Norris K, Mangione CM. Disparities in the diagnosis and pharmacologic treatment of high serum cholesterol by race and ethnicity: data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(8):929–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ford ES, Mokdad AH, Giles WH, Mensah GA. Serum total cholesterol concentrations and awareness, treatment, and control of hypercholesterolemia among US adults: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2000. Circulation. 2003;107(17):2185–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ford ES, Li C, Pearson WS, Zhao G, Mokdad AH. Trends in hypercholesterolemia, treatment and control among United States adults. Int J Cardiol. 2010;140(2):226–35. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.11.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz NB, Brewer HB Jr, Clark LT, Hunninghake DB, et al. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines. Circulation. 2004;110(2):227–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davidson MH, Toth PP. Combination therapy in the management of complex dyslipidemias. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2004;15(4):423–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor F, Huffman MD, Macedo AF, Moore THM, Burke M, Davey Smith G, et al. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;1:CD004816.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Insull W Jr. Clinical utility of bile acid sequestrants in the treatment of dyslipidemia: a scientific review. South Med J. 2006;99(3):257–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ijioma N, Robinson JG. Current and emerging therapies in hypercholesterolemia: focus on colesevelam. Clin Med Rev Vasc Health. 2010;2:21–40. doi:10.4137/cmrvh.s1573.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huijgen R, Abbink EJ, Bruckert E, Stalenhoef AFH, Imholz BPM, Durrington PN, et al. Colesevelam added to combination therapy with a statin and ezetimibe in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Clin Ther. 2010;32(4):615–25. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.04.014.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. The lipid research clinics coronary primary prevention trial results: I. Reduction in incidence of coronary heart disease. JAMA. 1984;251(3):351–64.

  13. Hunninghake D, Insull W Jr, Toth P, Davidson D, Donovan JM, Burke SK. Coadministration of colesevelam hydrochloride with atorvastatin lowers LDL cholesterol additively. Atherosclerosis. 2001;158(2):407–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Knapp HH, Schrott H, Ma P, Knopp R, Chin B, Gaziano JM, et al. Efficacy and safety of combination simvastatin and colesevelam in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Am J Med. 2001;110(5):352–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Davidson MH, Dillon MA, Gordon B, Jones P, Samuels J, Weiss S, et al. Colesevelam hydrochloride (cholestagel): a new, potent bile acid sequestrant associated with a low incidence of gastrointestinal side effects. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(16):1893–900.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Insull W Jr, Toth P, Mullican W, Hunninghake D, Burke S, Donovan JM, et al. Effectiveness of colesevelam hydrochloride in decreasing LDL cholesterol in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a 24-week randomized controlled trial. Mayo Clin Proc Mayo Clin. 2001;76(10):971–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bays H, Dujovne C. Colesevelam HCl: a non-systemic lipid-altering drug. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2003;4(5):779–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aldridge M, Ito M. Colesevelam hydrochloride: a novel bile acid-binding resin. Ann Pharmacother. 2001;35(7):898–907. doi:10.1345/aph.10263.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Toth PP, Davidson MH. Cholesterol absorption blockade with ezetimibe. Curr Drug Targets Cardiovasc Haematol Disord. 2005;5(6):455–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Blumenthal RS, Michos ED. The HALTS trial: halting atherosclerosis or halted too early? N Eng J Med. 2009;361(22):2178–80. doi:10.1056/NEJMe0908838.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kastelein JJP, Bots ML. Statin therapy with ezetimibe or niacin in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(22):2180–3. doi:10.1056/NEJMe0908841.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kastelein JJP, Akdim F, Stroes ESG, Zwinderman AH, Bots ML, Stalenhoef AFH, et al. Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(14):1431–43. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0800742.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brown BG, Taylor AJ. Does ENHANCE diminish confidence in lowering LDL or in ezetimibe? N Engl J Med. 2008;358(14):1504–7. doi:10.1056/NEJMe0801608.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Phan BAP, Dayspring TD, Toth PP. Ezetimibe therapy: mechanism of action and clinical update. Vasc Health Risk Manage. 2012;8:415–27. doi:10.2147/vhrm.s33664.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bays H. Review of ARBITER 2: extended-release niacin added to statin therapy slows the progression of atherosclerosis [commentary]. Postgrad Med. 2009;121(2):195–8. doi:10.3810/pgm.2009.03.1993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Baigent C, Landry M. Study of heart and renal protection (SHARP). Kidney Int. 2003;63(Suppl 84):S207–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Baigent C, Landray MJ, Reith C, Emberson J, Wheeler DC, Tomson C, et al. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377:2181–92. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60739-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Castelli WP, Garrison RJ, Wilson PW, Abbott RD, Kalousdian S, Kannel WB. Incidence of coronary heart disease and lipoprotein cholesterol levels: the Framingham Study. JAMA. 1986;256(20):2835–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kannel WB, Castelli WP, Gordon T. Cholesterol in the prediction of atherosclerotic disease: new perspectives based on the Framingham study. Ann Intern Med. 1979;90(1):85–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Otokozawa S, Ai M, Asztalos BF, White CC, Demissie-Banjaw S, Cupples LA, et al. Direct assessment of plasma low density lipoprotein and high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and coronary heart disease: results from the Framingham Offspring Study. Atherosclerosis. 2010;213(1):251–5. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.02.041 (Epub Mar 9).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Farley JF, Harley CR, Devine JW. A comparison of comorbidity measurements to predict healthcare expenditures. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12(2):110–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sloan KL, Sales AE, Liu CF, Fishman P, Nichol P, Suzuki NT, et al. Construction and characteristics of the RxRisk-V: a VA-adapted pharmacy-based case-mix instrument. Med Care. 2003;41(6):761–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hess LM, Raebel MA, Conner DA, Malone DC. Measurement of adherence in pharmacy administrative databases: a proposal for standard definitions and preferred measures. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40(7–8):1280–8. doi:10.1345/aph.1H018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Leslie RS 2007. Using arrays to calculate medication utilization. Proceedings of the 2007 SAS Global Forum, Orlando, FL. Paper 043-2007. http://www.lexjansen.com/pharmasug/2008/pr/pr07.pdf. Accessed 16 Jul 2014.

  36. Anderson TJ, Charbonneau F, Title LM, et al. Microvascular function predicts cardiovascular events in primary prevention: long-term results from the Firefighters and Their Endothelium (FATE) study. Circulation. 2011;123(2):163–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gaziano JM, Cincotta AH, Vinik A, et al. Effect of bromocriptine-QR (a quick-release formulation of bromocriptine mesylate) on major cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes subjects. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e002279. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3541616/. Accessed 16 Jul 2014.

  38. Stone NJ, Robinson J, Lichtenstein AH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. Published online November 12, 2013. http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/early/2013/11/11/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a.citation. Accessed 16 Jul 2014.

  39. Raymond C, Cho L, Rocco M, Hazen SL. New cholesterol guidelines: worth the wait? Cleve Clin J Med. 2014;81(1):11–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Sam Ye, PhD, for contributions to the study design and interpretation of the results and Feride Frech-Tamas, PhD, for contributions to the finalization of this manuscript. We also thank Mary Costantino, PhD, a full-time employee of Comprehensive Health Insights, Inc., who was paid for contributions to this manuscript, and for reviewing and editing this manuscript. This research was funded by Daiichi Sankyo Pharmaceuticals. Daiichi Sankyo manufactures and markets colesevelam HCl. Phil Schwab and Anthony Louder are employees of Comprehensive Health Insights, which received funding from Daiichi Sankyo for data access fees and research consulting services. Yong Li was an employee of Comprehensive Health Insights at the time of study execution. Dr. Harold Bays received funding from Daiichi Sankyo as a medical and research consultant. Sam Ye and Feride Frech-Tamas are employees and shareholders of Daiichi Sankyo. Rajiv Mallick was an employee of Daiichi Sankyo at the time of study execution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Schwab.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schwab, P., Louder, A., Li, Y. et al. Cholesterol Treatment Patterns and Cardiovascular Clinical Outcomes Associated with Colesevelam HCl and Ezetimibe. Drugs Aging 31, 683–694 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-014-0200-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-014-0200-6

Keywords

Navigation