Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Socioeconomic inequality in cardio-metabolic risk factors in a nationally representative sample of Iranian adolescents using an Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition method: the CASPIAN-III study

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The present research was conducted aiming at assessing the association of socioeconomic inequality in the prevalence of risk factors associated with cardio-metabolic disorders in a sample population of nationally representative Iranian adolescents and to identify its influencing factors.

Methods

This study was conducted as part of a national-based surveillance program performed on 5625 individuals aged 10–18 years in 27 provinces in Iran. To determine the socioeconomic status (SES) of participants, we defined a new variable by applying the principal component analysis. Doing so, the socioeconomic inequality in cardio-metabolic risk factors was examined over the tertiles of SES using concentration index (C). Then, Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition analysis was carried out in order to decide upon the roots of inequality in the health system.

Results

The mean (standard deviation) age of participants was 14.73 (2.41) years. The prevalence of cardio-metabolic parameters had considerable difference across SES tertiles. Elevated fasting blood glucose (FBG), elevated triglycerides (TG), abdominal obesity, elevated total cholesterol (TC), and metabolic syndrome (MetS) increased linearly by increasing SES tertiles. C index for depressed high density lipoprotein- cholesterol (HDL-C) was negative, which was suggestive of inequality in favor of high SES groups and for other cardio-metabolic parameters, it was positive, which indicate inequality was in favor of the lowest SES groups. The highest gap between the first and third tertiles of socioeconomic was for frequency of abdominal obesity; 13.18% of the lowest SES groups and 20.11% of the highest SES groups had abdominal obesity which accounts 6.93% gap in favor of the highest SES groups. The living area could be named as the main variables standing for the inequality of elevated FBS, elevated LDL-c, low HDL-c and abdominal obesity frequency between the first and the last SES group. In addition, BMI could stand as the main independent variable explaining the gap in elevated TG, elevated TC, elevated BP and MetS prevalence across the lowest and the highest SES group.

Conclusions

The study revealed the considerable inequality in the prevalence of cardio-metabolic risk factors between the highest and the lowest SES groups of Iranian adolescents. Living area and BMI are the two main factors which explained inequality in prevalence of cardio metabolic risk factors between SES groups. These estimations could provide health policy markers with practical information for future complementary analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Please contact author for data requests.

References

  1. Wagner KH, Brath H. A global view on the development of non communicable diseases. Prev Med. 2012;54(Suppl):S38–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kavey RE, Daniels SR, Lauer RM, Atkins DL, Hayman LL, Taubert K. American heart association guidelines for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease beginning in childhood. Circulation. 2003;107(11):1562–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Personen E, Liuba P. Footprints of atherosclerotic coronary heart disease in children. Rev Port Cardiol. 2004;23(1):127–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Parise H, Sullivan L, Meigs JB. Metabolic syndrome as a precursor of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2005;112(20):3066–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Organization WH. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva: WHO. 2011;2012.

  6. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet. 2006;367(9524):1747–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McLaren L. Socioeconomic status and obesity. Epidemiol Rev. 2007;29:29–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tamayo T, Christian H, Rathmann W. Impact of early psychosocial factors (childhood socioeconomic factors and adversities) on future risk of type 2 diabetes, metabolic disturbances and obesity: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:525.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu S, St-Onge MP, Heshka S, Heymsfield SB. Lifestyle behaviors associated with lower risk of having the metabolic syndrome. Metab Clin Exp. 2004;53(11):1503–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Park YW, Zhu S, Palaniappan L, Heshka S, Carnethon MR, Heymsfield SB. The metabolic syndrome: prevalence and associated risk factor findings in the US population from the third National Health and nutrition examination survey, 1988-1994. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(4):427–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Z, Zhai F, Du S, Popkin B. Dynamic shifts in Chinese eating behaviors. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2008;17(1):123–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhan Y, Yu J, Chen R, Gao J, Ding R, Fu Y, et al. Socioeconomic status and metabolic syndrome in the general population of China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:921.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hosseinpoor AR, Bergen N, Kunst A, Harper S, Guthold R, Rekve D, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in risk factors for non communicable diseases in low-income and middle-income countries: results from the world health survey. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:912.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelishadi R, Heshmat R, Motlagh ME, Majdzadeh R, Keramatian K, Qorbani M, et al. Methodology and early findings of the third survey of CASPIAN study: a National School-based Surveillance of Students' high risk behaviors. Int J Prev Med. 2012;3(6):394–401.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. McNamara JR, Schaefer EJ. Automated enzymatic standardized lipid analyses for plasma and lipoprotein fractions. Clin Chim Acta. 1987;166(1):1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106(25):3143–421.

  17. Zimmet P, Alberti G, Kaufman F, Tajima N, Silink M, Arslanian S, et al. The metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. Lancet. 2007;369(9579):2059–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Genuth S, Alberti KG, Bennett P, Buse J, Defronzo R, Kahn R, et al. Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(11):3160–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Balagopal PB, de Ferranti SD, Cook S, Daniels SR, Gidding SS, Hayman LL, et al. Nontraditional risk factors and biomarkers for cardiovascular disease: mechanistic, research, and clinical considerations for youth: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(23):2749–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rao S, Simmer K. World Health Organization growth charts for monitoring the growth of Australian children: time to begin the debate. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012;48(2):E84–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abdi H, Williams LJ. Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics. 2010;2(4):433–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. American Academy of Pediatrics. Children, adolescents, and television. Pediatrics. 2001;107(2):423–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zahedi H, Kelishadi R, Heshmat R, Motlagh ME, Ranjbar SH, Ardalan G, et al. Association between junk food consumption and mental health in a national sample of Iranian children and adolescents: the CASPIAN-IV study. Nutrition. 2014;30(11–12):1391–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Koolman X, Van Doorslaer E. On the interpretation of a concentration index of inequality. Health Econ. 2004;13(7):649–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shaw M, Galobardes B, Lawlor D, Lynch J, Wheeler B, Davey-Smith G. The handbook of inequality and socioeconomic position: conceptes and measures: the policy press; 2007.

  26. Pamuk ER. Social class inequality in mortality from 1921 to 1972 in England and Wales. Popul Stud. 1985;39(1):17–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Emamian MH, Zeraati H, Majdzadeh R, Shariati M, Hashemi H, Jafarzadehpur E, et al. Economic inequality in presenting near vision acuity in a middle-aged population: a blinder–Oaxaca decomposition. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(9):1100–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Emamian MH, Zeraati H, Majdzadeh R, Shariati M, Hashemi H, Fotouhi A. The gap of visual impairment between economic groups in Shahroud, Iran: a Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition. Am J Epidemiol. 2011:kwr050.

  29. Borooah V, Iyer S. The decomposition of inter-group differences in a logit model: extending the Oaxaca-blinder approach with an application to school enrolment in India. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Honaker J, King G, Blackwell M. Amelia II: A program for missing data. J Stat Softw. 2011;45(7):1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Berg G, Eijsden M, Galindo-Garre F, Vrijkotte TGM, Gemke RJBJ. Explaining socioeconomic inequalities in childhood blood pressure and prehypertension: the ABCD study. Hypertension. 2013;61:35–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fateh M, Emamian MH, Asgari F, Alami A, Fotouhi A. Socioeconomic inequality in hypertension in Iran. J Hypertens. 2014;32(9):1782–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shrewsbury V, Wardle J. Socioeconomic status and adiposity in childhood: a systematic review of cross-sectional studies 1990-2005. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16:275–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Powell LM, Wada R, Krauss RC, Wang Y. Ethnic disparities in adolescent body mass index in the United States: the role of parental socioeconomic status and economic contextual factors. Soc Sci Med. 2012:1–8.

  35. Fredericka CB, Snellmana K, Putnama RD. Increasing socioeconomic disparities in adolescent obesity. PNAS. 2014;111(4):1338–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Y, Zhang Q. Are American children and adolescents of low socioeconomic status at increased risk of obesity? Changes in the association between overweight and family income between 1971 and 2002. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:707–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wamala S. Etal. Swedish children and adolescents – a systematic review. Sweden: Swedish National Institue of Public Health; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Boričić K, Simić S, Erić JM. Demographic and socio-economic factors associated with multiple health risk behaviours among adolescents in Serbia: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:157–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Howe LD. Childhood overweight: socio-economic inequalities and consequences for later cardiovascular health longitudinal and life course. Studies. 2013;4(1):4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Thang N, Popkin B. Patterns of food consumption in Vietnam: effects on socioeconomic groups during an era of economic growth. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58:145–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Vereecken C. The relative influence of individual and contextual socio-economic status on consumption of fruit and soft drinks among adolescents in Europe. Europ J Pub Health. 2005;15(3):224–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vereecken C, et al. Breakfast consumption and its socio-demographic and lifestyle correlates in schoolchildren in 41 countries participating in the HBSC study. Int J Pub Health. 2009;54(Suppl. 2):180–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Borraccino A, et al. Socio-economic effects on meeting PA guidelines: comparisons among 32 countries. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(4):749–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Zambon A, et al. Do welfare regimes mediate the effect of socioeconomic position on health in adolescence? A cross-national comparison in Europe, North America, and Israel. Int J Health Serv. 2006;36(2):309–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gabhainn SN, et al. How well protected are sexually active 15-year-olds? Cross-national patterns in condom and contraceptive pill use 2002–2006. Int J Public Health. 2009;54:S209–S15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kuusela S, et al. Frequent use of sugar products by schoolchildren in 20 European countries, Israel and Canada in 1993/1994. Int Dent J. 1999;49(2):105–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Djalalinia S, Peykari N, Qorbani M, Larijani B, Farzadfar F. Inequality of obesity and socioeconomic factors in Iran: a systematic review and meta- analyses. Med J Islam Repub Iran (25 July) Vol :. 2015;29:241–56.

  48. Hosseinpoor AR, Bergen N, Mendis S, Harper S, Verdes E, Kunst A, et al. Socioeconomic inequality in the prevalence of noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: Results from the World Health Survey. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:474–787.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Moradi G, Mohammad K, Majdzadeh R, Ardakani HM, Naieni KH. Socioeconomic inequality of non-communicable risk factors among people living in Kurdistan province, Islamic Republic of Iran. Int J Prev Med. 2013;4:671–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Bahreynian M, Kelishadi R, Qorbani M, Motlagh ME, Kasaeian A, Ardalan G, et al. Weight disorders and anthropometric indices according to socioeconomic status of living place in Iranian children and adolescents: the CASPIAN-IV study. J Res Med Sci. 2015;20(5):440–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang Y. Cross-national comparison of childhood obesity: the epidemic and relationship between obesity and socioeconomic status. Int Epidemiol Assoc. 2001;30:1129–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Bahreynian M, Motlagh ME, Qorbani M, Heshmat R, Ardalan G, Kelishadi R. Prevalence of growth disorders in a nationally representative sample of Iranian adolescents according to socioeconomic status: the CASPIAN-III study. Pediatr Neonatol. 2015;56(4):242–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. The state of the world’s children. Adolescence: an age of opportunity. New York: UNICEF; 2011. p. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Ministry of Health and Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RK, MEM, RH, GA and MQ: designing the study, GS, FM and MQ Drafting of the manuscript, MQ, AS and RH: Analysis and interpretation of data AMG and ZA: Acquisition of data and RK and MQ: Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mostafa Qorbani or Roya Kelishadi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors also have no conflicts of interest and have no involvement that might raise the question of bias in the results reported here.

Ethical approval

The present study was approved by ethical committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shafiee, G., Qorbani, M., Heshmat, R. et al. Socioeconomic inequality in cardio-metabolic risk factors in a nationally representative sample of Iranian adolescents using an Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition method: the CASPIAN-III study. J Diabetes Metab Disord 18, 145–153 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-019-00401-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-019-00401-6

Keywords

Navigation