Skip to main content
Log in

An Easy, Simple, and Accessible Web-based Machine Learning Platform, SimPL-ML

  • Technical Article
  • Published:
Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most machine learning (ML) platforms used in materials science provide prediction models built using a computational database. However, to provide more practical and accurate material property predictions, it is advantageous to build a prediction model with user’s own data. Here, we present a web-based ML platform, SimPL-ML (https://www.simpl-ml.org) that enables the user to build an ML prediction model through a simple process using their own data. Our platform, SimPL-ML, comprises four main parts: a dataset editor for dataset preprocessing, a model generator to perform actual model training, a predictor to provide a predicted target value for an arbitrary input, and a band-gap predictor (as an example case study) to predict the band gap of inorganic materials through several optimized band gap prediction models. In addition to its core functions, SimPL-ML provides additional functions such as atomic feature generation and hyper-parameter optimization for efficient ML research. We expect our platform to facilitate more accurate and efficient materials research through ML.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Butler KT, Davies DW, Cartwright H, Isayev O, Walsh A (2018) Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature 559:547–555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Xie T, Grossman JC (2018) Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties. Phys Rev Lett 120:145301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ward L, Agrawal A, Choudhary A, Wolverton C (2016) A general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic materials. NPJ Comput Mater 2:201628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cai J, Chu X, Xu K, Li H, Wei J (2020) Machine learning-driven new material discovery. Nanoscale Adv 2:3115–3130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jha D, Choudhary K, Tavazza F, Liao W, Choudhary A, Campbell C, Agrawal A (2019) Enhancing materials property prediction by leveraging computational and experimental data using deep transfer learning. Nat Commun 10:5316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clement CL, Kauwe SK, Sparks TD (2020) Benchmark AFLOW data sets for machine learning. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 9:153–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen K, Biegler F, Ramakrishnan R, Pronobis W, Lilienfeld OA, Müller KR, Tkatchenko A (2015) Machine learning predictions of molecular properties: accurate many-body potentials and nonlocality in chemical space. J Phys Chem Lett 6:2326–2331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Binder A, Bockmayr M, Hägele M, Wienert S, Heim D, Hellweg K, Ishii M, Stenzinger A, Hocke A, Denkert C, Müller KR, Klauschen F (2021) Morphological and molecular breast cancer profiling through explainable machine learning. Nat Mach Intell 3:355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heinen S, Rudorff GF, Lilienfeld OA (2021) Toward the design of chemical reactions: Machine learning barriers of competing mechanisms in reactant space. J Chem Phys 155:064105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tkatchenko A (2020) Machine learning for chemical discovery. Nat Commun 11:4125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Deringer VL, Caro MA, Csányi G (2019) Machine learning interatomic potentials as emerging tools for materials science. Adv Mater 31:1902765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Na GS, Jang S, Chang H (2021) Predicting thermoelectric properties from chemical formula with explicitly identifying dopant effects. NPJ Comput Mater 7:106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Na GS, Jang S, Lee YL, Chang H (2020) Tuplewise material representation based machine learning for accurate band gap prediction. J Phys Chem A 124:10616–10623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Artrith N, Urban A, Ceder G (2017) Efficient and accurate machine-learning interpolation of atomic energies in compositions with many species. Phys Rev B 96:014112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bartel CJ, Trewartha A, Wang Q, Dunn A, Jain A, Ceder G (2020) A critical examination of compound stability predictions from machine-learned formation energies. NPJ Comput Mater 6:97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duan C, Liu F, Nandy A, Kulik HJ (2021) Putting density functional theory to the test in machine-learning-accelerated materials discovery. J Phys Chem Lett 12:4628–4637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim HW, Lee SW, Na GS, Han SJ, Kim SK, Shin JH, Chang H, Kim YT (2021) Reaction condition optimization for non-oxidative conversion of methane using artificial intelligence. React Chem Eng 6:235–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. AFLOW-ML http://aflow.org/aflow-ml. Accessed Oct 2021

  19. JARVIS ML https://jarvis.nist.gov/jarvisml. Accessed Oct 2021

  20. Kresse G, Furthmuller J (1996) Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys Rev B 54:11169–11186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Olson RS, Sipper M, Cava WL, Tartarone S, Vitale S, Fu W, Orzechowski P, Urbanowicz RJ, Holmes JH, Moore JH (2017) A system for accessible artificial intelligence. arXiv 1705:00594v2

  22. Amazon SageMaker (2021) https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sagemaker/latest/dg/whatis.html. Accessed Dec 2021

  23. Rapidminer Go (2021) https://rapidminer.com/why-rapidminer/. Accessed Dec 2021

  24. Li Z, Chard R, Ward L, Chard K, Skluzacek TJ, Babuji Y, Woodard A, Tuecke S, Blaiszik B, Franklin MJ, Foster I (2021) DLHub: simplifying publication, discovery, and use of machine learning models in science. J Parallel Distrib Comput 147:64–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Algorithmia (2021) https://algorithmia.com/. Accessed Dec 2021

  26. Crankshaw D, Wang X, Zhou G, Franklin MJ, Gonzalez JE, Stoica I (2017) Clipper: a low-latency online prediction serving system. In: 14th USENIX symposium on networked systems design and implementation (NSDI), pp 613–627

  27. Jang S SimPL-ML. https://simpl-ml.org. Accessed Oct 2021

  28. Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 785–794

  29. Gu T, Lu W, Bao X, Chen N (2006) Using support vector regression for the prediction of the band gap and melting point of binary and ternary compound semiconductors. Solid State Sci 8:129–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Friedman JH (2001) Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat 29:1189–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77:3865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Morales-García Á, Valero R, Illas F (2017) An empirical, yet practical way to predict the band gap in solids by using density functional band structure calculations. J Phys Chem C 121:18862–18866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhuo Y, Tehrani AM, Brgoch J (2018) Predicting the band gaps of inorganic solids by machine learning. J Phys Chem Lett 9:1668–1673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kaggle https://www.kaggle.com/datasets. Accessed Oct 2021

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the core KRICT project from the Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (SI2151-10) and the Nano-Material Technology Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2016M3A7B4025408).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Seunghun Jang or Hyunju Chang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 1751 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jang, S., Na, G.S., Lee, J. et al. An Easy, Simple, and Accessible Web-based Machine Learning Platform, SimPL-ML. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 11, 85–94 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-022-00250-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-022-00250-x

Keywords

Navigation