Skip to main content
Log in

Self-related information interfere with task performances: a cross-cultural investigation

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Culture and Brain

Abstract

Recent research suggests more enhanced processing of task-relevant self-information in Westerners than in Easterners. The current study further tested the hypothesis that self-related task-irrelevant information is processed more extensively in Westerners than in Easterners. British and Chinese participants were asked to judge the relative length of horizontal and vertical lines of a cross presented peripherally, while ignoring centrally presented self-related or non-self stimuli consisting of faces (Experiment 1) or names/dates (Experiment 2). We found that, relative to non-self stimuli, self-related stimuli delayed responses to targets in the short stimulus duration for British but not for Chinese participants. The effect was independent of stimulus domain. Our findings provide evidence for cultural differences in the processing of self-information that is independent of task demands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambady, N., & Bharucha, J. (2009). Culture and the brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 342–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 243–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brédart, S., Delchambre, M., & Laureys, S. (2006). One’s own face is hard to ignore. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 46–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, C. D., Brown-Iannuzzi, J., & Payne, B. K. (2012). Sequential priming measures of implicit social cognition: A meta-analysis of associations with behaviors and explicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 330–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiao, J. Y., Hariri, A. R., Harada, T., Mano, Y., Sadato, N., Parrish, T. B., & Lidaka, T. (2010). Theory and methods in cultural neuroscience. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 356–361.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronau, N., Cohen, A., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2003). Dissociations of personally significant and task-relevant distractors inside and outside the focus of attention: A combined behavioral and psychophysiological study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 512–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, S., & Northoff, G. (2008). Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: a transcultural neuroimaging approach. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. R., & Pashler, H. (2004). Attention and the processing of emotional words and names. Not so special after all. Psychological Science, 15, 172–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heatherton, T. F., Wyland, C. L., Macrae, C. N., Demos, K. E., Denny, B. T., & Kelly, W. M. (2006). Medial prefrontal activity differentiates self from close others. Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 1, 18–25.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. P., Freund, S., Hamilton, R. H., Ganis, G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2000). Hand response differences in a self-face identification task. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1047–1053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, W. M., Macrae, C. N., Wyland, C. L., Caglar, S., Inati, S., & Heatherton, T. F. (2002). Finding the self? An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 785–794.

  • Kesebir, S., & Oishi, S. (2010). A spontaneous self-reference effect in memory: Why some birthdays are harder to remember than others. Psychological Science, 21, 1525–1531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, H., & Brady, N. (2010). Self-face recognition is characterized by “bilateral gain” and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 840–847.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kitayama, S., & Tompson, S. (2010). Envisioning the future of cultural neuroscience. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y., & Han, S. (2010). Why respond faster to the self than others? An implicit positive association theory of self advantage during implicit face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 619–633.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implication for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 56–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roger, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, K. L., Caldwell, J., & Sorensen, R. E. (1997). Personal names and the attentional blink: A visual “cocktail party” effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 504–514.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sui, J., Liu, C. H., & Han, S. (2009). Cultural difference in neural mechanisms of self-recognition. Social Neuroscience, 4, 402–411.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sui, J., Sun, Y., Peng, K., & Humphreys, G. W. (2014). The automatic and the expected self: separating self- and familiarity biases effects by manipulating stimulus probability. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 76, 1176–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 371–394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G., Mao, L., Ma, Y., Yang, X., Cao, J., Liu, X., et al. (2012). Neural representations of close others in collectivistic brains. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 222–229.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolford, G., & Morrison, F. (1980). Processing of unattended visual information. Memory and Cognition, 8, 521–527.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2002). An experimental study on the self-reference effect. Science in China, Series C: Life Sciences, 45, 120–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, J., & Han, S. (2007). Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation. NeuroImage, 34, 1310–1316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Marie Curie Incoming International Fellowship, National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project 31371017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Sui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, M., Liu, C.H., Zhu, Y. et al. Self-related information interfere with task performances: a cross-cultural investigation. Cult. Brain 3, 112–121 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-015-0030-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40167-015-0030-3

Keywords

Navigation