Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performing DMEK with Other Surgical Procedures: Staged vs. Combined Approaches in Straightforward Cases

  • Cataract & Refractive Surgery (CE Starr and A Brissette, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Ophthalmology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

Various strategies exist in the approach to patients requiring both cataract removal and endothelial keratoplasty. In this review, we seek to define the differences in keratoplasty technique relevant to a multi-procedure case; to discuss known outcomes of the triple procedure, as well as outcome differences compared to staged procedures; and to identify knowledge gaps in need of further investigation.

Recent findings

Optimal management of ocular comorbidities is becoming increasingly relevant with the rapid growth of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) worldwide. The triple procedure combines endothelial keratoplasty, cataract extraction with lens implantation, and surgical iridotomy into a single surgical event. However, many approaches exist with regard to staged vs. combined procedures, and there are distinct advantages to each approach.

Summary

A surgeon’s experience and technical comfort will ultimately guide surgical planning. Deciding when to perform these procedures in a way most beneficial to the patient is essential to preoperative planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taylor DM. Keratoplasty and intraocular lenses. Ophthalmic Surg. 1976;7:31–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. In pursuit of emmetropia: spherical equivalent refraction results with deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (DLEK). Cornea. 2003;22:619–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, Phillips PM, Shah AK, Hoar KL, et al. Endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs’ dystrophy with cataract: complications and clinical results with the new triple procedure. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:631–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yokogawa H, Sanchez PJ, Mayko ZM, Straiko MD, Terry MA. Astigmatism correction with toric intraocular lenses in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty triple procedures. Cornea. 2017;36:269–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoeruek E, Bayyoud T, Hofmann J, Bartz-Schmidt KU. Novel maneuver facilitating Descemet membrane unfolding in the anterior chamber. Cornea. 2013;32:370–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Benage M, Korchak M, Boyce M, Mayko ZM, Bauer A, Straiko MD, et al. Intraoperative fibrin formation during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020;18:100686.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu L, Zha Y, Cai J, Zhang Y. Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a meta-analysis. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38:897–905.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Terry MA, Straiko MD, Veldman PB, Talajic JC, VanZyl C, Sales CS, et al. Standardized DMEK technique: reducing complications using prestripped tissue, novel glass injector, and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas. Cornea. 2015;34:845–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cirkovic A, Beck C, Weller JM, Kruse FE, Tourtas T. Anterior chamber air bubble to achieve graft attachment after DMEK: is bigger always better? Cornea. 2016;35:482–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ham L, Dapena I, van Luijk C, van der Wees J, Melles GR. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy: review of the first 50 consecutive cases. Eye (Lond). 2009;23:1990–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schlogl A, Tourtas T, Kruse FE, Weller JM. Long-term clinical outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;169:218–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nanavaty MA, Wang X, Shortt AJ. Endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2(2):CD008420.

  13. Singh A, Zarei-Ghanavati M, Avadhanam V, Liu C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty/Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2017;36:1437–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chamberlain W, Lin CC, Austin A, Schubach N, Clover J, McLeod SD, et al. Descemet endothelial thickness comparison trial: a randomized trial comparing ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:19–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Burkhart ZN, Feng MT, Price FW Jr, Price MO. One-year outcomes in eyes remaining phakic after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:430–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen SY, Terry MA. Step-by-step Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty surgery. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2019;9:18–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Narendran N, Jaycock P, Johnston RL, Taylor H, Adams M, Tole DM, et al. The Cataract National Dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55,567 operations: risk stratification for posterior capsule rupture and vitreous loss. Eye (Lond). 2009;23:31–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ergun SB, Kocamis SI, Cakmak HB, Cagil N. The evaluation of the risk factors for capsular complications in phacoemulsification. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38:1851–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mednick Z, Sorkin N, Einan-Lifshitz A, Santaella G, Trinh T, Chan CC, et al. Long-term outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in postvitrectomized eyes with the use of pars plana infusion. Cornea. 2020;39:457–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Inoda S, Hayashi T, Takahashi H, Oyakawa I, Yokogawa H, Kobayashi A, et al. Risk factors for cystoid macular edema after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2019;38:820–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Akman A, Yilmaz G, Oto S, Akova YA. Comparison of various pupil dilatation methods for phacoemulsification in eyes with a small pupil secondary to pseudoexfoliation. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1693–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chaurasia S, Price FW Jr, Gunderson L, Price MO. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: clinical results of single versus triple procedures (combined with cataract surgery). Ophthalmology. 2014;121:454–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Price MO, Giebel AW, Fairchild KM, Price FW Jr. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:2361–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schoenberg ED, Price FW Jr, Miller J, McKee Y, Price MO. Refractive outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty triple procedures (combined with cataract surgery). J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1182–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Horn FK, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation: advanced triple procedure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154:47–55 e2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shahnazaryan D, Sese AH, Hollick EJ. Endothelial cell loss after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy: DMEK compared to triple-DMEK. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;218:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Arnalich-Montiel F, Perez-Sarriegui A, Lauzirika G, Porrua L, Hernandez-Verdejo JL. Pupillary abnormalities in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty after nearly full tamponade. Cornea. 2017;36:290–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. van Dijk K, Rodriguez-Calvo-de-Mora M, van Esch H, Frank L, Dapena I, Baydoun L, et al. Two-year refractive outcomes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2016;35:1548–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheung AY, Chachare DY, Eslani M, Schneider J, Nordlund ML. Tomographic changes in eyes with hyperopic shift after triple Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44:738–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. van Dijk K, Ham L, Tse WH, et al. Near complete visual recovery and refractive stability in modern corneal transplantation: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013;36:13–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Musa FU, Cabrerizo J, Quilendrino R, Dapena I, Ham L, Melles GR. Outcomes of phacoemulsification after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:836–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. de Silva SR, Evans JR, Kirthi V, Ziaei M, Leyland M. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12:CD003169.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shajari M, Kolb CM, Mayer WJ, Agha B, Steinwender G, Dirisamer M, et al. Characteristics of preoperative and postoperative astigmatism in patients having Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45:1001–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Price MO, Pinkus D, Price FW Jr. Implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses staged after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in patients with Fuchs dystrophy. Cornea. 2020;39(6):732–5.

  35. Zeidenweber DA, Mayko ZM, Straiko MD, Terry MA. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with previous laser refractive surgery: outcomes and complications. Cornea. 2017;36:1302–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Luceri S, Baksoellah Z, Ilyas A, Baydoun L, Melles GR. Interface fluid syndrome after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) because of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy reversed by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea. 2016;35:1658–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Livny E, Bahar I, Levy I, Mimouni M, Nahum Y. “PI-less DMEK”: results of Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) without a peripheral iridotomy. Eye (Lond). 2019;33(4):653–8.

  38. Einan-Lifshitz A, Sorkin N, Boutin T, Showail M, Borovik A, Jamshidi F, et al. Comparison of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) and air tamponade in noniridectomized Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2018;37:273–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Arslan OS, Dogan C, Mergen B. Six-month results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in 100 eyes: first clinical results from Turkey. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2019;49:235–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Gonzalez A, Price FW Jr, Price MO, Feng MT. Prevention and management of pupil block after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2016;35:1391–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Showail M, Obthani MA, Sorkin N, Einan-Lifshitz A, Boutin T, Borovik A, et al. Outcomes of the first 250 eyes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Canadian centre experience. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018;53:510–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Leon P, Parekh M, Nahum Y, Mimouni M, Giannaccare G, Sapigni L, et al. Factors associated with early graft Detachment in primary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;187:117–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Crews JW, Price MO, Lautert J, Feng MT, Price FW Jr. Intraoperative hyphema in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty alone or combined with phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44:198–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Parker J, Dirisamer M, Naveiras M, Tse WHW, van Dijk K, Frank LE, et al. Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty in phakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:871–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, Giebel AW, Price FW. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival, and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:2368–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hamzaoglu EC, Straiko MD, Mayko ZM, Sales CS, Terry MA. The first 100 eyes of standardized Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus standardized Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:2193–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Billing for Yag PI Prior to Corneal Transplant. American Academy of Ophthalmology 2018. https://www.aao.org/practice-management/news-detail/billing-yag-pi-prior-to-corneal-transplant. Accessed Nov 14, 2020.

  48. He M, Jiang Y, Huang S, Chang DS, Munoz B, Aung T, et al. Laser peripheral iridotomy for the prevention of angle closure: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1609–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Harada T, Mizuno K, Awaya S. Contribution of the argon laser in iridotomy using the Yag laser. J Fr Ophtalmol. 1989;12:545–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Azuara-Blanco A, Burr JM, Cochran C, et al. The effectiveness of early lens extraction with intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma (EAGLE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2011;12:133.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

• Conceptualization: C.S.S., M.A.G., J.L.L.

• Literature search: Y.W.K., D.A.R., C.S.S.

• Writing—original draft preparation: Y.W.K., D.A.R., C.S.S.

• Writing—review and editing: Y.W.K., D.A.R., J.L.L., M.A.G., C.S.S.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher S. Sales.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Yong W. Kam, David A. Ramirez, Jennifer J. Ling, and Mark A. Greiner each declare no potential conflicts of interest. Christopher S. Sales receives royalties from Network Medical Coronet for intellectual property.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cataract & Refractive Surgery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kam, Y.W., Ramirez, D.A., Ling, J.J. et al. Performing DMEK with Other Surgical Procedures: Staged vs. Combined Approaches in Straightforward Cases. Curr Ophthalmol Rep 9, 57–64 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40135-021-00264-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40135-021-00264-2

Keywords

Navigation