Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measuring Contact Lens Discomfort

  • Contact lens discomfort (P. Asbell, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Ophthalmology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The measurement of contact lens discomfort is complex; the sensation experienced is inherently variable, and existing measurement scales may not be optimal. This manuscript aims to review and describe instruments commonly used to measure contact lens discomfort. Appropriately designed questionnaires undergo a rigorous process of item development and validation. Interval scales (e.g. numerical rating scale and visual analogue scale) are frequently used to measure temporal characteristics of contact lens discomfort and remain useful in assessing qualities such as duration, onset and chronicity. The majority of studies of contact lens discomfort have used questionnaires designed and validated for use in dry eye patients, most commonly the ocular surface disease index. This practice is questionable as the characteristics, epidemiology and underlying mechanisms of the sensations of discomfort experienced by contact lens wearers differ from those reported by dry eye patients. There is a clear need for context specific validation of these instruments to occur. Improved instruments urgently need to be developed. Until then, interval scales and the CLDEQ-8, a short version of the contact lens dry eye questionnaire, represent the best-validated instruments currently available for measuring the temporal characteristics and the frequency and intensity of contact lens discomfort, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Nichols JJ, Willcox MD, Bron AJ, Belmonte C, Ciolino JB, Craig JP, Dogru M, Foulks GN, Jones L, Nelson JD, Nichols KK, Purslow C, Schaumberg DA, Stapleton F, Sullivan DA, Members of the International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: executive summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(11):TFOS7–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. •• Nichols KK, Redfern RL, Jacob JT, Nelson JD, Fonn D, Forstot SL, Huang J-F, Holden BA, Nichols JJ. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the definition and classification subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54(11): TFOS14–19. Consensus report on the definition of contact lens discomfort. This sets the framework for a working definition of contact lens discomfort, it’s natural history and impact on wearers.

  3. •• Foulks G, Chalmers R, Keir N, Woods CA, Simpson T, Lippman R, Gleason W, Schaumberg DA, Willcox MDP, Jalbert I. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the subcommittee on clinical trial design and outcomes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(11): TFOS157–82. Consensus report on clinical trial design and primary and secondary outcomes in studies of contact lens discomfort. This report describes how measures of discomfort can be impacted by trial design and provides recommendations for best practice in designing studies to measure discomfort.

  4. • Massof RW. Understanding Rasch and item response theory models: applications to the estimation and validation of interval latent trait measures from responses to rating scale questionnaires. Ophthal Epidemiol. 2011;18(1): 1–19. Key review article describing key concepts in questionnaire design and validation, appropriate to the questionnaires reviewed in this article.

  5. Papas EB, Keay L, Golebiowski B. Estimating a just-noticeable difference for ocular comfort in contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(7):4390–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(5):615–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Begley CG, Chalmers RL, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK, Caffery B, Simpson T, DuToit R, Portello J, Davis L. Characterization of ocular surface symptoms from optometric practices in North America. Cornea. 2001;20(6):610–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. •• Chalmers RL, Begley CG, Moody K, Hickson-Curran SB. Contact lens dry eye questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8) and opinion of contact lens performance. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89(10):1435–42. This paper describes and provides some validation for the short form of the Contact Lens Dry Eye questionnaire which is the sole instrument designed for measuring aspects of ocular discomfort and dryness symptoms specifically related to contact lens wear.

  9. Johnson ME, Murphy PJ. Measurement of ocular surface irritation on a linear interval scale with the ocular comfort index. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(10):4451–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Simmons PA, Vehige JG, Carlisle C, Felix C. Comparison of dry eye signs in self-described mild and moderate patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(5):2448.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Korb DR, Herman JP, Greiner JV, Scaffidi RC, Finnemore VM, Exford JM, Blackie CA, Douglass T. Lid wiper epitheliopathy and dry eye symptoms. Eye Contact Lens. 2005;31(1):2–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McMonnies CW, Ho A. Responses to a dry eye questionnaire from a normal population. J Am Optom Assoc. 1987;58(7):588–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chalmers RL, Begley CG. Dryness symptoms among an unselected clinical population with and without contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29(1):25–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stapleton F, Marfurt C, Golebiowski B, Rosenblatt M, Bereiter D, Begley C, Dartt D, Gallar J, Belmonte C, Hamrah P, Willcox M, T. I. W. o. C. L. Discomfort. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the subcommittee on neurobiology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(11):TFOS71–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nichols KK, Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL. The reliability and validity of McMonnies dry eye index. Cornea. 2004;23(4):365–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK, Chalmers R, Begley C. The performance of the contact lens dry eye questionnaire as a screening survey for contact lens-related dry eye. Cornea. 2002;21(5):469–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gothwal VK, Pesudovs K, Wright TA, McMonnies CW. McMonnies questionnaire: enhancing screening for dry eye syndromes with Rasch analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(3):1401–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Simpson TL, Situ P, Jones LW, Fonn D. Dry eye symptoms assessed by four questionnaires. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(8):692–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen J, Simpson TL. A role of corneal mechanical adaptation in contact lens-related dry eye symptoms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(3):1200–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yeniad B, Beginoglu M, Bilgin LK. Lid-wiper epitheliopathy in contact lens users and patients with dry eye. Eye Contact Lens. 2010;36(3):140–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ngo W, Situ P, Keir N, Korb D, Blackie C, Simpson T. Psychometric properties and validation of the standard patient evaluation of eye dryness questionnaire. Cornea. 2013;32(9):1204–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Evans KS, North RV, Purslow C. Tear ferning in contact lens wearers. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009;29(2):199–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Michel M, Sickenberger W, Pult H. The effectiveness of questionnaires in the determination of contact lens induced dry eye. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009;29(5):479–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nichols JJ, Willcox MDP, Bron AJ, Belmonte C, Ciolino JB, Craig JP, Dogru M, Foulks GN, Jones L, Nelson JD, Nichols KK, Purslow C, Schaumberg DA, Stapleton F, Sullivan DA, Lens TIWC. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: executive summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(11):7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fonn D. Targeting contact lens induced dryness and discomfort: what properties will make lenses more comfortable. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(4):279–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Professor Stapleton reports other from Alcon, Nidek, Allergan, grants from the National Health and Medical Council of Australia, outside the submitted work, she has nothing to disclose. Dr. Jalbert and Dr. Golebiowski have nothing to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article contains no studies with human or animal subjects performed by the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia

    Isabelle Jalbert, Blanka Golebiowski & Fiona Stapleton

Authors
  1. Isabelle Jalbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Blanka Golebiowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fiona Stapleton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fiona Stapleton.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Contact lens discomfort.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jalbert, I., Golebiowski, B. & Stapleton, F. Measuring Contact Lens Discomfort. Curr Ophthalmol Rep 3, 106–110 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40135-015-0070-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40135-015-0070-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation