Abstract
Prediction of particulate matter (PM10) episode in advance enables for better preparation to avert and reduce the impact of air pollution ahead of time. This is possible with proper understanding of air pollutants and the parameters that influence its pattern. Hence, this study analysed daily average PM10, temperature (T), humidity (H), wind speed and wind direction data for 5 years (2006–2010), from two industrial air quality monitoring stations. These data were used to evaluate the impact of meteorological parameters and PM10 in two peculiar seasons: south-west monsoon and north-east monsoon seasons, using principal component analysis (PCA). Subsequently, lognormal regression (LR), multiple linear regression (MLR) and principal component regression (PCR) methods were used to forecast next-day average PM10 concentration level. The PCA result (seasonal variability) showed that peculiar relationship exists between PM10 pollutants and meteorological parameters. For the prediction models, the three methods gave significant results in terms of performance indicators. However, PCR had better predictability, having a higher coefficient of determination (R2) and better performance indicator results than LR and MLR methods. The outcomes of this study signify that PCR models can be effectively used as a suitable format in predicting next-day average PM10 concentration levels.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdullah N, Shuhaimi S, Toh Y, Shafee A, Maznorizan M (2011) The study of seasonal variation of PM10 concentration in Peninsula, Sabah and Sarawak. Malaysian Meteorological Department, no. 9
Abdul-Wahab SA, Bakheit CS, Al-Alawi SM (2005) Principal component and multiple regression analysis in modelling of ground-level ozone and factors affecting its concentrations. Environ Model Softw 20(10):1263–1271
Afzali A, Rashid M, Sabariah B, Ramli M (2014) PM10 pollution: its prediction and meteorological influence in Pasirgudang, Johor. Paper presented at the IOP conference series: earth and environmental science
Azid A, Juahir H, Toriman ME, Endut A, Kamarudin MKA, Rahman MNA, Hasnam CNC, Saudi ASM, Yunus K (2014) Source apportionment of air pollution: a case study in Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi 72(1):83–88
Azmi SZ, Latif MT, Ismail AS, Juneng L, Jemain AA (2010) Trend and status of air quality at three different monitoring stations in the Klang Valley, Malaysia. Air Qual Atmos Health 3(1):53–64
Chaloulakou A, Grivas G, Spyrellis N (2003) Neural network and multiple regression models for PM10 prediction in Athens: a comparative assessment. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 53(10):1183–1190
D.o.E. (2006) Malaysia environmental quality report. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Putrajaya
D.o.E. (2007) Malaysia environmental quality report. Ministry of Natural Resources, Putrajaya
D.o.E. (2008) Malaysia environmental quality report. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Putrajaya
D.o.E. (2009) Malaysia environmental quality report 2009. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Putrajaya
D.o.E. (2010) Annual report on Malaysia environmental quality 2010. Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment, Putrajaya
Dominick D, Juahir H, Latif MT, Zain SM, Aris AZ (2012) Spatial assessment of air quality patterns in Malaysia using multivariate analysis. Atmos Environ 60:172–181
Ebi KL, McGregor G (2008) Climate change, tropospheric ozone and particulate matter, and health impacts. Environ Health Perspect 116(11):1449–1455
Hamida HA, Yahayab AS, Ramlib NA, Ul-Saufie AZ (2012) Performance of parameter estimator for the two-parameter and three-parameter gamma distribution in PM10 data modelling. Int J Eng Technol 2(4):637–643
Harrison RM, Laxen D, Moorcroft S, Laxen K (2012) Processes affecting concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) in the UK atmosphere. Atmos Environ 46:115–124
Hörmann S, Pfeiler B, Stadlober E (2005) Analysis and prediction of particulate matter PM10 for the winter season in Graz. Austrian J Stat 34(4):307–326
Johnson N, Kotz S, Balakrishnan N (1994) Lognormal distributions. Continuous univariate distributions, vol 1. Wiley, New York
Kassomenos P, Vardoulakis S, Chaloulakou A, Paschalidou A, Grivas G, Borge R, Lumbreras J (2014) Study of PM 10 and PM 2.5 levels in three European cities: analysis of intra and inter urban variations. Atmos Environ 87:153–163
Katsouyanni K, Samet JM, Anderson HR, Atkinson R, Le Tertre A, Medina S, Samoli E, Touloumi G, Burnett RT, Krewski D, Ramsay T, Dominici F, Peng RD, Schwartz J, Zanobetti A (2009) Air pollution and health: a European and North American approach (APHENA). Res Rep Health Eff Inst 2009(142):5–90
Kovač-Andrić E, Brana J, Gvozdić V (2009) Impact of meteorological factors on ozone concentrations modelled by time series analysis and multivariate statistical methods. Ecol Inform 4(2):117–122
Kozawa KH, Winer AM, Fruin SA (2012) Ultrafine particle size distributions near freeways: effects of differing wind directions on exposure. Atmos Environ 63:250–260
Latif MT, Huey LS, Juneng L (2012) Variations of surface ozone concentration across the Klang Valley, Malaysia. Atmos Environ 61:434–445
Lu H-C (2004) Estimating the emission source reduction of PM 10 in Central Taiwan. Chemosphere 54(7):805–814
M. Department of Statistics (2010) Population and Housing Census of Malaysia 2010. Department of Statistics, Malaysia, Putrajaya
Mutalib SNSA, Juahir H, Azid A, Sharif SM, Latif MT, Aris AZ, Dominick D (2013) Spatial and temporal air quality pattern recognition using environmetric techniques: a case study in Malaysia. Environ Sci Process Impacts 15(9):1717–1728
Namdeo A, Bell M (2005) Characteristics and health implications of fine and coarse particulates at roadside, urban background and rural sites in UK. Environ Int 31(4):565–573
Nejadkoorki F, Baroutian S (2012) Forecasting extreme PM10 concentrations using artificial neural networks. Int J Environ Res 6(1):277–284
Schwartz J (2001) Air pollution and blood markers of cardiovascular risk. Environ Health Perspect 109(Suppl 3):405
Slini TH, Karatzas K, Papadopoulos A (2002) Regression analysis and urban air quality forecasting: an application for the city of Athens. Global Nest Int J 4(2–3):153–162
Slini T, Kaprara A, Karatzas K, Moussiopoulos N (2006) PM 10 forecasting for Thessaloniki, Greece. Environ Model Softw 21(4):559–565
Taşpınar F (2015) Improving artificial neural network model predictions of daily average PM10 concentrations by applying principle component analysis and implementing seasonal models. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 65(7):800–809
Taşpınar F, Bozkurt Z (2014) Application of artificial neural networks and regression models in the prediction of daily maximum PM10 concentration in Düzce, Turkey
Ul-Saufie AZ, Yahya AS, Ramli NA, Hamid HA (2011) Comparison between multiple linear regression and feed forward back propagation neural network models for predicting PM10 concentration level based on gaseous and meteorological parameters. Int J Appl 1(4):42–49
Ul-Saufie A, Yahya A, Ramli N, Hamid H (2012a) Future PM10 concentration prediction using quantile regression models. Paper presented at the international conference on environmental and agriculture engineering, IACSIT Press, Singapore
Ul-Saufie AZ, Yahaya AS, Ramli N, Hamid HA (2012b) Performance of multiple linear regression model for long-term PM10 concentration prediction based on gaseous and meteorological parameters. J Appl Sci 12(14):1488
Ul-Saufie AZ, Yahaya AS, Ramli NA, Rosaida N, Hamid HA (2013) Future daily PM 10 concentrations prediction by combining regression models and feedforward backpropagation models with Principle Component Analysis (PCA). Atmos Environ 77:621–630
Vardoulakis S, Kassomenos P (2008) Sources and factors affecting PM 10 levels in two European cities: implications for local air quality management. Atmos Environ 42(17):3949–3963
Yusof NFFM, Ramli NA, Yahaya AS, Sansuddin N, Ghazali NA, Al Madhoun W (2010) Monsoonal differences and probability distribution of PM10 concentration. Environ Monit Assess 163(1–4):655–667
Acknowledgment
Appreciation goes to Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS for making this study possible. Additional gratitude goes to the Department of Environment (DOE) Malaysia for providing the data used for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: Anlei Wei.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nazif, A., Mohammed, N.I., Malakahmad, A. et al. Multivariate analysis of monsoon seasonal variation and prediction of particulate matter episode using regression and hybrid models. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16, 2587–2600 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1905-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1905-6