Abstract
Because sperm chromatin may play a key role in reproductive success, we verify the associations between sperm chromatin abnormalities, embryo development and the ability to achieve pregnancy. The evaluation of sperm chromatin maturity using aniline blue (AB), chromomycin A3 (CMA3) and toluidine blue (TB) staining were carried out in group of males from infertile couples that underwent ICSI. Low levels of sperm chromatin abnormalities (< 16%) were found in most subjects (> 50%). A higher percentage of TB-positive sperm cells were discovered in the men from couples who achieved ≤ 50% fertilized oocytes compared to men who achieved > 50%. No significant differences were discovered by the applied tests between the men from couples who achieved ≤ 50% and those who achieved > 50% high-quality embryos on the 3rd or 5th day after fertilization, nor between the men from couples who achieved pregnancy and those who failed. The sperm chromatin maturity did not correlate with the ICSI results. However, the ROC analysis revealed a significant predictive value of TB-positive spermatozoa only for fertilization. Therefore, the TB assay can be considered as a useful test for the prediction of fertilization. Our findings suggest that the level of sperm chromatin abnormalities of the examined men was not clinically significant. No found associations between sperm chromatin maturity and embryo development and the ability to achieve pregnancy. We could not exclude the effects of the repairing processes in the fertilized oocyte. The use of complementary tests that verify the status of the sperm chromatin seems justified.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bungum M, Bungum L, Giwercman A. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA): a tool in diagnosis and treatment of infertility. Asian J Androl. 2011;13:69–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2010.73.
Esteves SC. Novel concepts in male factor infertility: clinical and laboratory perspectives. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:1319–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0763-8.
Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Agarwal A. An update on the clinical assessment of the infertile male. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66:691–700. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1807-59322011000400026.
Tahmasbpour E, Balasubramanian D, Agarwal A. A multi-faceted approach to understanding male infertility: gene mutations, molecular defects and assisted reproductive techniques (ART). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:1115–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0280-6.
Wdowiak A, Wdowiak A, Bakalczuk S, Bakalczuk G. Relationship between alcohol consumption and a sperm nuclear DNA fragmentation and pregnancy. Postep Androl Online. 2016;3:14–21.
Aydos OS, Yükselten Y, Kaplan F, Sunguroğlu A, Aydos K. Analysis of the correlation between sperm DNA integrity and conventional semen parameters in infertile men. Turk J Urol. 2015;241:191–7. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2015.98475.
Fernandez-Encinas A, García-Peiró A, Ribas-Maynou J, et al. Characterization of nuclease activity in human seminal plasma and its relationship to semen parameters, sperm DNA fragmentation and male infertility. J Urol. 2016;195:213–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.089.
Omran HM, Bakhiet M, Dashti MG. DNA integrity is a critical molecular indicator for the assessment of male infertility. Mol Med Rep. 2013;7:1631–5. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2013.1390.
Hotaling JM, Smith JF, Rosen M, Muller CH, Walsh TJ. The relationship between isolated teratozoospermia and clinical pregnancy after in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1141–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.029.
Avendaño C, Franchi A, Duran H, Oehninger S. DNA fragmentation of normal spermatozoa negatively impacts embryo quality and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:549–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.050.
Agarwal A, Majzoub A, Esteves SC, Ko E, Ramasamy R, Zini A. Clinical utility of sperm DNA fragmentation testing: practice recommendations based on clinical scenarios. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5:935–50. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.10.03.
Bieniek JM, Drabovich AP, Lo KC. Seminal biomarkers for the evaluation of male infertility. Asian J Androl. 2016;18:426–33. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682x.175781.
van der Horst G, du Plessis S. Not just the marriage of Figaro: but the marriage of WHO/ESHRE semen analysis criteria with sperm functionality. Postep Androl Online. 2017;4(1):6–21.
Iranpour FG. Impact of sperm chromatin evaluation on fertilization rate in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Adv Biomed Res. 2013;3:229. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.145719.
Rubino P, Viganò P, Luddi A, Piomboni P. The ICSI procedure from past to future: a systematic review of the more controversial aspects. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;22:194–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv050.
Sakkas D, Ramalingam M, Garrido N, Barratt CL. Sperm selection in natural conception: what can we learn from Mother Nature to improve assisted reproduction outcomes? Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:711–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv042.
Utsuno H, Miyamoto T, Oka K, Shiozawa T. Morphological alterations in protamine-deficient spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:2374–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu225.
Bounartzi T, Dafopoulos K, Anifandis G, et al. Pregnancy prediction by free sperm DNA and sperm DNA fragmentation in semen specimens of IVF/ICSI-ET patients. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2016;19:56–62. https://doi.org/10.3109/14647273.2016.1157629.
Irez T, Sahmay S, Ocal P, et al. Investigation of the association between the outcomes of sperm chromatin condensation and decondensation tests, and assisted reproduction techniques. Andrologia. 2015;47:438–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12286.
Simon L, Murphy K, Shamsi MB, et al. Paternal influence of sperm DNA integrity on early embryonic development. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:2402–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu228.
Robinson L, Gallos ID, Conner SJ, et al. The effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on miscarriage rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2908–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des261.
Talebi AR, Fesahat F, Mangoli E, Ghasemzadeh J, Nayeri M, Sadeghian-Nodoshan F. Relationship between sperm protamine deficiency and apoptosis in couples with unexplained repeated spontaneous abortions. Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd). 2016;14:199–204.
Asmarinah, Syauqy A, Umar LA, et al. Sperm chromatin maturity and integrity correlated to zygote development in ICSI program. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2016;62:309–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2016.1210695.
Carrell DT, Liu L, Peterson CM, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation is increased in couples with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss. Arch Androl. 2003;49:49–55.
Ioannou D, Miller D, Griffin DK, Tempest HG. Impact of sperm DNA chromatin in the clinic. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:157–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0624-x.
Kazerooni T, Asadi N, Jadid L, et al. Evaluation of sperm’s chromatin quality with acridine orange test, chromomycin A3 and aniline blue staining in couples with unexplained recurrent abortion. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26:591–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-009-9361-3.
Leach M, Aitken RJ, Sacks G. Sperm DNA fragmentation abnormalities in men from couples with a history of recurrent miscarriage. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55:379–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12373.
Sadeghi MR, Hodjat M, Lakpour N, Arefi S, Amirjannati N, Modarresi T. Effects of sperm chromatin integrity on fertilization rate and embryo quality following intracytoplasmic sperm injection. AJMB. 2009;1:173–80.
Talebi AR, Vahidi S, Aflatoonian A, et al. Cytochemical evaluation of sperm chromatin and DNA integrity in couples with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortions. Andrologia. 2012;44:462–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.2011.01206.x.
Tarozzi N, Nadalini M, Stronati A, et al. Anomalies in sperm chromatin packaging: implications for assisted reproduction techniques. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18:486–95.
Tavalaee M, Deemeh MR, Arbabian M, Kiyani A, Nasr-Esfahani MH. Relationship between fertilization rate and early apoptosis in sperm population of infertile individuals. Andrologia. 2012;46:36–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.12038.
Bach PV, Schlegel PN. Sperm DNA damage and its role in IVF and ICSI. Basic Clin Androl. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-016-0043-6.
Bronet F, Martínez E, Gaytán M, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation index does not correlate with the sperm or embryo aneuploidy rate in recurrent miscarriage or implantation failure patients. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1922–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des148.
Coughlan C, Clarke H, Cutting R, et al. Sperm DNA fragmentation, recurrent implantation failure and recurrent miscarriage. Asian J Androl. 2015;17:681–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.144946.
Tavalaee M, Razavi S, Nasr-Esfahani MH. Influence of sperm chromatin anomalies on assisted reproductive technology outcome. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1119–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.063.
Zhang Z, Zhu L, Jiang H, Chen H, Chen Y, Dai Y. Sperm DNA fragmentation index and pregnancy outcome after IVF or ICSI: a meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-014-0374-1.
Chan PJ, Orzylowska EM, Corselli JU, Jacobson JD, Wei AK. A simple sperm DNA toroid integrity test and risk of miscarriage. Biomed Res Int. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/780983.
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization Press; 2010.
Talebi AR, Khalili MA, Vahidi S, Ghasemzadeh J, Tabibnejad N. Sperm chromatin condensation, DNA integrity, and apoptosis in men with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013;36:140–6. https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772312y.0000000055.
O’Flaherty CM, Chan PT, Hales BF, Robaire B. Sperm chromatin structure components are differentially repaired in cancer survivors. J Androl. 2012;33:629–36. https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.111.015388.
Scott L, Alvero R, Leondires M, Miller B. The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2394–403. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.11.2394.
Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1155–8.
Bączkowski T, Kurzawa R, Głąbowski W. Methods of embryo scoring in in vitro fertilization. Reprod Biol. 2004;4:5–22.
Heitmann RJ, Hill MJ, Richter KS, DeCherney AH, Widra EA. The simplified SART embryo scoring system is highly correlated to implantation and live birth in single blastocyst transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;4:563–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-013-9932-1.
Tandara M, Bajić A, Tandara L, et al. Sperm DNA integrity testing: big halo is a good predictor of embryo quality and pregnancy after conventional IVF. Andrology. 2014;2:678–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-2927.2014.00234.x.
Razavi S, Nasr-Esfahani MH, Mardani M, Mafi A, Moghdam A. Effect of human sperm chromatin anomalies on fertilization outcome post-ICSI. Andrologia. 2003;35:238–43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0272.2003.00566.
Carrell DT, Emery BR, Hammoud S. Altered protamine expression and diminished spermatogenesis: what is the link? Hum Reprod Updat. 2007;13:313–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-2927.2014.00234.x.
Francis S, Yelumalai S, Jones C, Coward K. Aberrant protamine content in sperm and consequential implications for infertility treatment. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2014;17:80–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/14647273.2014.915347.
Oliva R, Castillo J. Proteomics and genetics of sperm chromatin condensation. Asian J Androl. 2011;13:24–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2010.65.
Ward WS. Function of sperm chromatin structural elements in fertilization and development. Mol Hum Reprod. 2010;16:30–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gap080.
Agarwal A, Cho CL, Majzoub A, Esteves SC. The Society for Translational Medicine: clinical practice guidelines for sperm DNA fragmentation testing in male infertility. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(Suppl 4):720–33. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.08.06.
Evenson DP. Evaluation of sperm chromatin structure and DNA strand breaks is an important part of clinical male fertility assessment. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:495. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.07.20.
Piasecka M, Gaczarzewicz D, Laszczyńska M, Starczewski A, Brodowska A. Flow cytometry application in the assessment of sperm DNA integrity of men with asthenozoospermia. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2007;45(1):127–36.
Simon L, Emery BR, Carrell DT. Review: impact of sperm DNA damage in assisted reproduction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.07.003 (Published online ahead of print 24 July 2017).
Wiweko B, Utami P. Predictive value of sperm deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fragmentation index in male infertility. Basic Clin Androl. 2017;27:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-016-0046-3.
Zheng WW, Song G, Wang QL, et al. Sperm DNA damage has a negative effect on early embryonic development following in vitro fertilization. Asian J Androl. 2017; https://doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_19_17 (Published online ahead of print Jun 30).
Tsarev I, Bungum M, Giwercman A, et al. Evaluation of male fertility potential by Toluidine Blue test for sperm chromatin structure assessment. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1569–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep068.
Nasr-Esfahani MH, Razavi S, Mardani M. Relation between different human sperm nuclear maturity tests and in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001;18:219–25.
Karydis S, Asimakopoulos B, Papadopoulos N, Vakalopoulos I, Al-Hasani S, Nikolettos N. ICSI outcome is not associated with the incidence of spermatozoa with abnormal chromatin condensation. In Vivo. 2005;19:921–5.
Sadeghi MR, Lakpour N, Heidari-Vala H, et al. Relationship between sperm chromatin status and ICSI outcome in men with obstructive azoospermia and unexplained infertile normozoospermia. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2011;52:645–51.
Tavares RS, Silva AF, Lourenço B, Almeida-Santos T, Sousa AP, Ramalho-Santos J. Evaluation of human sperm chromatin status after selection using a modified Diff-Quik stain indicates embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization. Andrology. 2013;1:830–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00127.x.
Simon L, Zini A, Dyachenko A, Ciampi A, Carrell DT. A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of sperm DNA damage on in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Asian J Androl. 2017;19:80–90. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682x.182822.
Agarwal A, Cho CL, Esteves SC. Should we evaluate and treat sperm DNA fragmentation? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28:164–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/gco.0000000000000271.
Cissen M, Wely MV, Scholten I, et al. Measuring sperm DNA fragmentation and clinical outcomes of medically assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0165125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165125.
Ward SW. Eight tests for sperm DNA fragmentation and their roles in the clinic. Transl Androl Urol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.03.78 (in press, Published online ahead of print).
Nasr-Esfahani MH, Razavi S, Mozdarani H, Mardani M, Azvagi H. Relationship between protamine deficiency with fertilization rate and incidence of sperm premature chromosomal condensation post-ICSI. Andrologia. 2004;36:95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.2004.00612.x.
Ribas-Maynou J, García-Peiró A, Fernández-Encinas A, et al. Comprehensive analysis of sperm DNA fragmentation by five different assays: TUNEL assay, SCSA, SCD test and alkaline and neutral Comet assay. Andrology. 2013;1:715–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00111.x.
Borini A, Tarozzi N, Bizzaro D, Bonu MA, Fava L, Flamigni C, Coticchio G. Sperm DNA fragmentation: paternal effect on early post-implantation embryo development in ART. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2876–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del251.
Ozmen B, Caglar GS, Koster F, Schopper B, Diedrich K, Al-Hasani S. Relationship between sperm DNA damage, induced acrosome reaction and viability in ICSI patients. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15:208–14.
Nasr-Esfahani MH, Salehi M, Razavi S, Mardani M, Bahramian H, Steger K, Oreizi F. Effect of protamine-2 deficiency on ICSI outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;9:652–8.
Nasr-Esfahani MH, Salehi M, Razavi S, et al. Effect of sperm DNA damage and sperm protamine deficiency on fertilization and embryo development post-ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:198–205.
Nasr-Esfahani MH, Razavi S, Tavalaee M. Failed fertilization after ICSI and spermiogenic defects. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:892–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.04.012.
Lord T, Aitken RJ. Fertilization stimulates 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine repair and antioxidant activity to prevent mutagenesis in the embryo. Dev Biol. 2015;406:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.07.024.
Ménézo Y, Dale B, Cohen M. DNA damage and repair in human oocytes and embryos: a review. Zygote. 2010;18:357–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0967199410000286.
Perry M. Chemically induced DNA damage and sperm and oocyte repair machinery: the story gets more interesting. Asian J Androl. 2015. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682x.156118 (Published online ahead of print).
Tesarik J, Greco E, Mendoza C. Late, but not early, paternal effect on human embryo development is related to sperm DNA fragmentation. Human Reprod. 2004;19:611–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh127.
Tesarik J. Paternal effects on cell division in the human preimplantation embryo. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:370–5.
Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN. Origins and consequences of DNA damage in male germ cells. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:727–33.
Gavriliouk D, Aitken RJ. Damage to sperm DNA mediated by reactive oxygen species: its impact on human reproduction and the health trajectory of offspring. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;868:23–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18881-2_2.
Bohrer RC, Coutinho AR, Duggavathi R, Bordignon V. The incidence of DNA double-strand breaks is higher in late-cleaving and less developmentally competent porcine embryos. Biol Reprod. 2015;93:59. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.115.130542.
He M, Tan L. Correlation between sperm ultrastructure in infertile patients with abnormal sperm morphology and DNA damage. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14:17000–6. https://doi.org/10.4238/2015.december.15.6.
Aitken RJ, Bronson R, Smith TB, De Iuliis GN. The source and significance of DNA damage in human spermatozoa; a commentary on diagnostic strategies and straw man fallacies. Mol Hum Reprod. 2013;19:475–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gat025.
Dada R, Kumar M, Jesudasan R, Fernández JL, Gosálvez J, Agarwal A. Epigenetics and its role in male infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:213–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9715-0.
Simon L, Liu L, Murphy K, et al. Comparative analysis of three sperm DNA damage assays and sperm nuclear protein content in couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:904–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu040.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland Grants No. WNoZ-322-04/S/2016 and No. FSN-322-5/2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
13577_2018_203_MOESM1_ESM.tif
Supplemental Fig. 1a–c. Non-invasive morphological evaluation of human embryo after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertilized oocyte assessed within the first 24 h (a), embryo development on the 3rd day (b) and on the 5th day (c). The embryo was rated as follows: 2PN – zygote with visible female and male pronuclei containing nucleoli; 8A1 – a top-quality embryo with eight symmetrical blastomeres without cytoplasmic defects and fragmentation (according to Bączkowski et al. [43]); AA – a top-quality embryo with blastocoel filling and a well-developed inner cell mass and trophectoderm (according to Gardner et al. [42]). Original microphotographs obtained from infertile couples treated with ICSI; scale bar = 25 µm. (TIFF 3731 kb)
13577_2018_203_MOESM2_ESM.tif
Supplemental Fig. 2. Dynamics of the chromatin-remodeling process during spermatogenesis and epididymal sperm maturation. Chromatin remodeling is associated with chromosome reorganization, compaction and stabilization. Its condensation is mediated by protamination, characterized by the massive incorporation of protamines into the minor groove of DNA. Protamination is a complex process and is involved in the replacement of the following: the somatic histones by testicular-specific histones (Ht) (1), Ht by transition proteins (TP) (2) and TP by protamines (3). The chemical modifications of histone peptides and the formation of DNA strand breaks by topoisomerase facilitate the incorporation of these proteins to the DNA strand. Stabilization of the chromatin structure is mediated by the binding of zinc ions to the protamines at the end of the spermiogenesis (4). The depletion of these ions from the protamines takes place during epididymal sperm maturation (5). The mature sperm chromatin contains ≤ 15% of testicular histones. Asterisks indicate cytochemical tests that have been applied to reveal nuclear sperm compaction abnormalities at the different stages of nuclear remodeling; aniline blue staining (AB test) is able to detect sperm cells with excessive presence of histones, the TUNEL test (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling) reveals persisting DNA strand breaks, chromomycin A3 staining (CMA3 test) is used to display spermatozoa with protamine deficiency, and toluidine blue (TB test) allows for the discrimination between sperm cells with immature chromatin structure and normal chromatin. According to Carrell et al. [47], Ward [50], Oliva and Castillo [49] and Francis et al. [48] with own modifications. (TIFF 39105 kb)
13577_2018_203_MOESM3_ESM.tif
Supplemental Fig. 3. Predicted embryo development after fertilization with DNA-damaged sperm cell (details in the text). BER – base excision repair, NER – nucleotide excision repair, MMR – DNA mismatch repair, TDP 1 and 2 – tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 and 2. (TIFF 42007 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gill, K., Rosiak, A., Gaczarzewicz, D. et al. The effect of human sperm chromatin maturity on ICSI outcomes. Human Cell 31, 220–231 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13577-018-0203-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13577-018-0203-4