Skip to main content
Log in

Recurrent glioblastoma: a single-institution experience with reirradiation and temozolomide

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Radiation Oncology

Abstract

Background

Glioblastoma is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis. Outcomes following recurrences are dismal despite the use of multimodality treatment. Surgery is usually not a viable option, and even in those who do undergo surgery, adjuvant radiation therapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy may be viable options depending on several factors such as performance status, disease volume, and time since prior therapy. We intended to assess the efficacy of high precision reirradiation with temozolomide as a salvage modality in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Methods

Twenty-five patients with recurrent glioblastoma who received reirradiation (with or without concurrent temozolomide) for recurrence at our department between 2010 and 2015 were included in this retrospective analysis. Treatment decisions are taken following recommendations of multidisciplinary tumor board. Treatment details were noted from respective case records. Survival time was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox regression analysis.

Results

Eighteen men and seven women with a mean age of 52 years (range, 20–65 years) received reirradiation during the given period. Median Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) was 70% (range, 40–90). Twelve patients underwent surgery before reirradiation, while 13 patients were deemed inoperable and direct taken for reirradiation. The reirradiation methods included stereotactic radiosurgery (2), hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (15–40 Gy in 3–5 fractions; 14 patients), or conventionally fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (45–54 Gy in 25–27 fractions; 9 patients). Patients who received conventional fractionated radiation also received concurrent temozolomide at 75 mg/m2. All patients completed the planned course of radiation therapy and also received adjuvant temozolomide. MGMT methylation status was available for 15 patients; 7 had MGMT methylated while 8 had non-methylated tumors.

Median follow-up from recurrence was 12 months (range, 1–47.8 months). Median overall survival (OS) from recurrence was 15.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10–20.33 months). None of the factors analyzed (age, sex, gross tumor volume at time of recurrence, KPS, MGMT, time of recurrence) were significant for outcomes. No grade 3 or above acute or late complications were noted following reirradiation.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that reirradiation with high precision radiotherapy along with temozolomide is an effective option in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amelio D, Amichetti M (2012) Radiation therapy for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: an overview. Cancers (Basel). 4(1):257–280

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Amichetti M, Amelio D (2011) A review of role of re-irradiation in recurrent high grade glioma. Cancers (Basel) 3(4):4061–4089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biswas T, Okunieff P, Schell MC, Smudzin T, Pilcher WH, Bakos RS et al (2009) Stereotactic radiosurgery for glioblastoma: retrospective analysis. Radiat Oncol Lond Engl 4:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cabrera AR, Cuneo KC, Desjardins A, Sampson JH, McSherry F, Herndon JE II, Peters KB, Allen K, Hoang JK, Chang Z et al (2013) Concurrent stereotactic radiosurgery and bevacizumab in recurrent malignant gliomas: a prospective trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 86:873–879

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cassano A, Longo R, Angelelli L, et al. (2001). Temozolomide in first line treatment of recurrent or residual malignant brain tumors. ASCO Proceedings, Annual Meeting, www.asco.com: Abstract No. 2058

  6. Cho KH, Hall WA, Gerbi BJ, Higgins PD, McGuire WA, Clark HB (1999) Single dose versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45(5):1133–1141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Combs SE, Bischof M, Welzel T et al (2008) Radiochemotherapy with temozolomide as re-irradiation using high precision fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) in patients with recurrent gliomas. J Neuro-Oncol 89(2):205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Combs SE, Edler L, Rausch R, Welzel T, Wick W, Debus J (2013) Generation and validation of a prognostic score to predict outcome after re-irradiation of recurrent glioma. Acta Oncol Stockh Swed 52(1):147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Conti A, Pontoriero A, Arpa D, et al; Efficacy and toxicity of CyberKnife re-irradiation and “dose dense” temozolomide for recurrent gliomas. Acta Neurochir 2012; 154(2):203–209.

  10. Dhermain F, de Crevoisier R, Parker F et al (2004) Role of radiotherapy in recurrent gliomas. Bull Cancer 91(11):883–889

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dincoglan F, Beyzadeoglu M, Sager O et al (2015) Management of patients with recurrent glioblastoma using hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Tumori 101(2):179–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dong Y, Fu C, Guan H et al (2016) Re-irradiation alternatives for recurrent high-grade glioma. Oncol Lett 12(4):2261–2270

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Fogh SE, Andrews DW, Glass J, Curran W, Glass C, Champ C et al (2010) Hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy: an effective therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 28(18):3048–3053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fokas E, Wacker U, Gross MW, Henzel M, Encheva E, Engenhart-Cabillic R (2009) Hypofractionated stereotactic reirradiation of recurrent glioblastomas: a beneficial treatment option after high-dose radiotherapy? Strahlenther Onkol Organ Dtsch Roentgenges Al 185(4):235–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gorlia T, van den Bent MJ, Hegi ME et al (2008) Nomograms for predicting survival of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: prognostic factor analysis of EORTC and NCIC trial 26981-22981/CE.3. Lancet Oncol 9(1):29–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grosu AL, Weber WA, Franz M, Stärk S, Piert M, Thamm R et al (2005) Reirradiation of recurrent high-grade gliomas using amino acid PET (SPECT)/CT/MRI image fusion to determine gross tumor volume for stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63(2):511–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gutin PH, Iwamoto FM, Beal K, Mohile NA, Karimi S, Hou BL, Lymberis S, Yamada Y, Chang J, Abrey LE (2009) Safety and efficacy of bevacizumab with hypofractionated stereotactic irradiation for recurrent malignant gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75:156–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Henke G, Paulsen F, Steinbach JP, Ganswindt U, Isijanov H, Kortmann R-D et al Hypofractionated reirradiation for recurrent malignant glioma. Strahlenther Onkol Organ Dtsch Roentgenges Al 185(2):113–119

  19. Hudes RS, Corn BW, Werner-Wasik M, Andrews D, Rosenstock J, Thoron L et al (1999) A phase I dose escalation study of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy as salvage therapy for persistent or recurrent malignant glioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43(2):293–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hundsberger T, Brügge D, Putora PM, Weder P, Weber J, Plasswilm L (2013) Re-irradiation with and without bevacizumab as salvage therapy for recurrent or progressive high-grade gliomas. J Neuro-Oncol 112:133–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lederman G, Wronski M, Arbit E, Odaimi M, Wertheim S, Lombardi E et al (2000) Treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme using fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery and concurrent paclitaxel. Am J Clin Oncol 23(2):155–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr et al (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8:1277–1280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mayer R, Sminia P (2008) Reirradiation tolerance of the human brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70(5):1350–1360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Minniti G, Armosini M, Salvati G et al (2011) Fractionated stereotactic reirradiation and concurrent temozolomide in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Neuro-Oncol 103(3):683–691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mohammed AM, Osman (2014) Phase II trial of temozolomide and reirradiation using conformal 3D-radiotherapy in recurrent brain gliomas. Ann Transl Med 2(5):44

    Google Scholar 

  26. Niyazi M, Ganswindt U, Schwarz SB, Kreth F-W, Tonn J-C, Geisler J et al (2012) Irradiation and bevacizumab in high-grade glioma retreatment settings. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(1):67–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Neyns B, Everaert E, Joosens E et al (2004) Temozolomide for the treatment of recurrent glioma: results of a compassionate use program in Belgium. J Clin Oncol 22:abstr 1541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Patel M, Siddiqui F, Jin J-Y, Mikkelsen T, Rosenblum M, Movsas B et al (2009) Salvage reirradiation for recurrent glioblastoma with radiosurgery: radiographic response and improved survival. J Neuro-Oncol 92(2):185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roy S, Lahiri D, Biswas J (2015) Recurrent glioblastoma: where we stand. South Asian J Cancer 4(4):163–173

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumour and Radiation Oncology Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10(5):459–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):987–996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Su YW, Chang MC, Chiang MF, Hsieh RK (2005) Treatment-related myelodysplastic syndrome after temozolomide for recurrent high-grade glioma. J Neuro-Oncol 71(3):315–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. van Kampen M, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Debus J, Fuss M, Rhein B, Wannenmacher M (1998) The radiosurgery of glioblastoma multiforme in cases of recurrence. The Heidelberg experiences compared to the literature. Strahlenther Onkol Organ Dtsch Rontgenges Al 174(1):19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Veninga T, Langendijk HA, Slotman BJ et al (2001) Reirradiation of primary brain tumours: survival, clinical response and prognostic factors. Radiother Oncol 59:127–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vordermark D, Kölbl O, Ruprecht K, Vince GH, Bratengeier K, Flentje M (2005) Hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation: treatment option in recurrent malignant glioma. BMC Cancer 5:55

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Vredenburgh JJ, Desjardins A, Herndon JE II et al (2007) Phase II trial of bevacizumab and irinotecan in recurrent malignant glioma. Clin Cancer Res 13(4):1253–1259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepak Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent specific to the study is not required. However, consent for the planned treatment was taken from each patient at the time of enrolment, with permission to use the anonymised data for research purposes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kataria, T., Gupta, D., Gupta, R. et al. Recurrent glioblastoma: a single-institution experience with reirradiation and temozolomide. J Radiat Oncol 6, 133–141 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-017-0307-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-017-0307-6

Keywords

Navigation