Abstract
Purpose
We evaluated whether a differential impact of adding 6 months of androgen deprivation (ADT) to radiation therapy (RT) on all-cause (ACM), prostate cancer-specific (PCSM), and other-cause mortality (OCM) in men with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer (PC) exists within Gleason score (GS) subgroups.
Methods and materials
Individual patient data from 743 men with unfavorable-risk PC from two randomized ADT trials were utilized. Competing risks and Cox regression were used to determine whether adding 6 months of ADT to RT significantly impacted PCSM, OCM, and ACM within GS subgroups.
Results
Men with GS 9/10 versus ≤8 were significantly more likely to be over 75 (23.3 versus 12.7 %; p = 0.03). At a median follow-up of 11.93 and 11.81 years in the 683 and 60 patients with GS ≤8 and GS 9/10, 315 (46.1 %) and 44 (73.1 %) died, respectively. ADT in men with GS ≤8 was associated with significantly decreased ACM (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 0.66; 95 % confidence interval: 0.52–0.82; p < 0.001) and PCSM (0.43; 0.28–0.66; p < 0.001) but no significant difference in OCM (0.90; 0.68–1.17; p = 0.43) Among men with GS 9/10 PC ADT significantly reduced PCSM (0.33; 0.11–0.99; p = 0.048) but not ACM (0.79; 0.38–1.61; p = 0.51) and increased OCM (2.16; 0.81–5.79; p = 0.12), resulting in opposite effects of ADT on OCM by the GS subgroup such that the relative AHR of OCM in GS 9/10 versus ≤8 was nearly significantly increased (2.42 [0.87,6.71]; p = 0.09).
Conclusion
While ADT reduced PCSM risk overall, survival was not prolonged in men with GS 9/10 due to ADT-driven increased OCM, which supports the hypothesis that older men with significant comorbidity may not experience prolonged survival when ADT is added to RT.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pierorazio PM, Walsh PC, Partin AW, Epstein JI (2013) Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system. BJU Int 111:753–60. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11611.x
D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB et al (1999) Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:168–72
Gleason DF, Mellinger GT (1974) Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. J Urol 111:58–64
Rusthoven CG, Waxweiler TV, DeWitt PE et al (2015) Gleason stratifications prognostic for survival in men receiving definitive external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 33:71.e11–9. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.07.010
Bostwick DG (1994) Gleason grading of prostatic needle biopsies. Correlation with grade in 316 matched prostatectomies. Am J Surg Pathol 18:796–803
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2014) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer., http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf
D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB et al (1998) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280:969–74
Warde P, Mason M, Ding K et al (2011) Combined androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 378:2104–11. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61095-7
Widmark A, Klepp O, Solberg A et al (2009) Endocrine treatment, with or without radiotherapy, in locally advanced prostate cancer (SPCG-7/SFUO-3): an open randomised phase III trial. Lancet 373:301–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61815-2
Bolla M, Van Tienhoven G, Warde P et al (2010) External irradiation with or without long-term androgen suppression for prostate cancer with high metastatic risk: 10-year results of an EORTC randomised study. Lancet Oncol 11:1066–73. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70223-0
D’Amico AV, Chen M-H, Renshaw AA et al (2008) Androgen suppression and radiation vs radiation alone for prostate cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 299:289–95. doi:10.1001/jama.299.3.289
Denham JW, Steigler A, Lamb DS et al (2011) Short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: 10-year data from the TROG 96.01 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 12:451–9. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70063-8
Bolla M, de Reijke TM, Van Tienhoven G et al (2009) Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 360:2516–27. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0810095
Zapatero A, Guerrero A, Maldonado X et al (2015) High-dose radiotherapy with short-term or long-term androgen deprivation in localised prostate cancer (DART01/05 GICOR): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 16:320–7. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70045-8
Horwitz EM, Bae K, Hanks GE et al (2008) Ten-year follow-up of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 92-02: a phase III trial of the duration of elective androgen deprivation in locally advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:2497–504. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9021
Denham JW, Joseph D, Lamb DS et al (2014) Short-term androgen suppression and radiotherapy versus intermediate-term androgen suppression and radiotherapy, with or without zoledronic acid, in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (TROG 03.04 RADAR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 factorial. Lancet Oncol 15:1076–89. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70328-6
Nabid A, Carrier N, Martin A-G et al (2013) Duration of androgen deprivation therapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a randomized trial. ASCO Meet Abstr 31:LBA4510
Thompson IM, Ankerst DP, Chi C et al (2006) Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:529–34. doi:10.1093/jnci/djj131
Piccirillo JF, Vlahiotis A, Barrett LB et al (2008) The changing prevalence of comorbidity across the age spectrum. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 67:124–32. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.01.013
Extermann M (2000) Measurement and impact of comorbidity in older cancer patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 35:181–200
Jousilahti P, Vartiainen E, Tuomilehto J, Puska P (1999) Sex, age, cardiovascular risk factors, and coronary heart disease: a prospective follow-up study of 14 786 middle-aged men and women in Finland. Circulation 99:1165–1172. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.99.9.1165
Tsai HK, D’Amico AV, Sadetsky N et al (2007) Androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer and the risk of cardiovascular mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1516–24. doi:10.1093/jnci/djm168
D’Amico AV, Denham JW, Crook J et al (2007) Influence of androgen suppression therapy for prostate cancer on the frequency and timing of fatal myocardial infarctions. J Clin Oncol 25:2420–5. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.09.3369
Saigal CS, Gore JL, Krupski TL et al (2007) Androgen deprivation therapy increases cardiovascular morbidity in men with prostate cancer. Cancer 110:1493–500. doi:10.1002/cncr.22933
Nanda A, Chen M-H, Braccioforte MH et al (2009) Hormonal therapy use for prostate cancer and mortality in men with coronary artery disease-induced congestive heart failure or myocardial infarction. JAMA 302:866–73. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1137
O’Farrell S, Garmo H, Holmberg L et al (2015) Risk and timing of cardiovascular disease after androgen-deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 33:1243–51. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.59.1792
D’Amico AV, Chen M-H, Renshaw A et al (2015) Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial of radiation with or without androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer. JAMA 314:1291–3. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.8577
Beahrs O, Henson D, Hutter R (1992) American Joint Committee on Cancer: manual for staging cancer, 4th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Hollander M, Wolfe D (1999) Nonparametric statistical methods, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Agresti A (2013) Inference for two-way contingency tables. Categ. Data anal, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 69–112
Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481. doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452
Gaynor J, Feuer E, Tan C (1993) On the use of cause-specific failure and conditional failure probabilities: examples from clinical oncology data. J Am Stat Assoc 88:400–409. doi:10.2307/2290318
Kutner M, Nachtshein C, Neter J (2005) Analysis of factor level means. Appl. Linear regres. Model, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York, pp 756–759
Klein J, Moeschberger M (1997) Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data (statistics for biology and health). Springer, New York
Keating NL, O’Malley AJ, Smith MR (2006) Diabetes and cardiovascular disease during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:4448–56. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.06.2497
Traish AM, Saad F, Feeley RJ, Guay A (2009) The dark side of testosterone deficiency: III. Cardiovascular disease. J Androl 30:477–94. doi:10.2164/jandrol.108.007245
Scher HI, Fizazi K, Saad F et al (2012) Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 367:1187–97. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1207506
Beer TM, Armstrong AJ, Rathkopf DE et al (2014) Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 371:424–33. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1405095
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
Laura Warren, Ming-Hui Chen, James Denham, Allison Steigler, Andrew Renshaw, Marian Loffredo, Philip Kantoff, and Anthony D’Amico declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Warren, L.E.G., Chen, MH., Denham, J.W. et al. Gleason score and the risk of cause-specific and all-cause mortality following radiation with or without 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy for men with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer. J Radiat Oncol 5, 301–308 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-016-0260-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-016-0260-9