Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacokinetics Comparison, Intestinal Absorption and Acute Toxicity Assessment of a Novel Water-Soluble Astragaloside IV Derivative (Astragalosidic Acid, LS-102)

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Astragaloside IV (AGS IV) is the most important bioactive constituent of Radix Astragali. However, its disappointing clinical application is mainly caused by its very low solubility in biologic fluids, resulting in poor bioavailability after oral administration. We recently obtained a novel water-soluble derivative of AGS IV (astragalosidic acid, LS-102) that displayed significant cardioprotective potential against hypoxia-induced injury. The objective of this study was to investigate the intestinal absorption, main pharmacokinetic parameters and acute toxicity of LS-102 in rodents compared with AGS IV.

Methods

An oral dose of LS-102 and AGS IV (20 mg/kg) was administered to Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, and blood samples were collected at predetermined time points. The plasma concentrations were detected by a validated UHPLC-MS/MS method, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a compartmental model. In the intestinal permeability study, the transport of LS-102 across Caco-2 cell monolayers was investigated at six concentrations from 6.25 to 250 µM. Moreover, the acute toxicity of LS-102 (40–5000 mg/kg) via a single oral administration was investigated in BALB/c mice.

Results

LS-102 was rapidly absorbed, attaining a maximum concentration of 248.7 ± 22.0 ng/ml at 1.0 ± 0.5  h after oral administration. The relative bioavailability of LS-102 was twice that of AGS IV. LS-102 had a Papp (mean) of 15.72–25.50 × 10−6 cm/s, which was almost 500-fold higher than that of AGS IV, showing that LS-102 had better transepithelial permeability and could be better absorbed in the intestinal tract. The acute toxicity study showed no abnormal changes or mortality in mice treated with LS-102 even at the single high dose of 5000 mg/kg body weight.

Conclusions

Oral LS-102 produced a pharmacokinetic profile different from AGS IV with higher bioavailability, while the toxic tolerance was similar to previous estimates. Thus, we speculated that LS-102 might provide better clinical efficacy and be a potential candidate for the new drug development of Radix Astragali.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fu J, Wang Z, Huang L, Zheng S, et al. Review of the botanical characteristics, phytochemistry, and pharmacology of Astragalus membranaceus (Huangqi). Phytother Res. 2014;28(9):1275–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.5188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liao H, Hu L, Cheng X, Wang X, et al. Are the therapeutic effects of Huangqi (Astragalus membranaceus) on diabetic nephropathy correlated with its regulation of macrophage iNOS activity? J Immunol Res. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3780572.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang K, Wu J, Duan X, Wu J, et al. Huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2017;96(39):e8167. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu L, Chen Y, Xu Y, Guo X, et al. Oral Huangqi formulae for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid-Based Compl Alt Med. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/705315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu L, Zhou C, Luo Z, Zeng W, et al. The lipid-lowering effects of Danhong and Huangqi injections: a meta-analysis of clinical controlled trials. Lipids Health Dis. 2018;17(1):106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-018-0760-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Li L, Hou X, Xu R, Liu C, et al. Research review on the pharmacological effects of astragaloside IV. Funda Clin Pharmacol. 2017;31(1):17–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcp.12232.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu M, Yin J, Xie L, Zhang J, et al. Pharmacokinetics and tolerance of toal astragalosides after intravenous infusion of astragalosides injection in healthy Chinese volunteers. Phytomedicine. 2013;20(12):1105–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2013.05.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Xie J, Xiong J, Ding L-S, et al. A efficient method to identify cardioprotective components of Astragali Radix using a combination of molecularly imprinted polymers-based knockout extract and activity evaluation. J Chromatogr A. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2018.09.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Du Y, Zhang Q, Chen G, et al. Pharmacokinetics of astragaloside IV in rats by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Eur J Drug Metab Ph. 2005;30(4):269–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03190631.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gu Y, Wang G, Pan G, et al. Transport and bioavailability studies of astragaloside IV, an active ingredient in Radix Astragali. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2004;95(6):295–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2004.t01-1-pto950508.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang Q, Zhu L-L, Chen G-G, et al. Pharmacokinetics of astragaloside IV in beagle dogs. Eur J Drug Metab Ph. 2007;32(2):75–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03190995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang CR, Wang GJ, Wu XL, et al. Absorption enhancement study of astragaloside IV based on its transport mechanism in Caco-2 cells. Eur J Drug Metab Ph. 2006;31(1):5–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03190635.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin J, Li C, Ruan L, et al. Study on the bioavailability of HP-β-cyclodextrin inclusion compound astragaloside IV in rats. China Pharmacist. 2010;13(4):469–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu A-N, Chen H, Tang X. Preparation and physical stability of astragaloside IV lipid microspheres for injection. Chin J Pharm. 2009;7(4):290–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Y, Gao W. Study on solubilization effect of hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin on astragaloside IV by phase solubility method. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs. 2007;38(5):710–1.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Qing L-S, Peng S-L, Liang J, et al. Astragalosidic acid: a new water-soluble derivative of astragaloside IV prepared using remarkably simple TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Molecules. 2017;22(8):1275. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22081275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gu Y, Wang G, Fawcett JP. Determination of astragaloside IV in rat plasma by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B. 2004;801(2):285–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2003.11.033.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yan L-X, Guo D-A. Quantitation of astragaloside IV in rat plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B. 2005;824(1):244–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.07.032.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang W, Zhang C, Liu R, et al. Quantitative determination of astragaloside IV, a natural product with cardioprotective activity, in plasma, urine and other biological samples by HPLC coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B. 2005;822(1):170–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.05.034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang W-D, Zhang C, Liu R-H, et al. Preclinical pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of a natural cardioprotective agent astragaloside IV in rats and dogs. Life Sci. 2006;79(8):808–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2006.02.032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hodin S, Basset T, Jacqueroux E, Delezay O, Clotagatide A, Perek N, Mismetti P, Delavenne X. In vitro comparison of the role of P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein on direct oral anticoagulants disposition. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2018;43(2):183–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-017-0434-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang C-P, Li Z, Zhang T-H, Liu F, Ruan J-X, Zhang Z-Q. Transcellular transport of aconitine across human intestinal Caco-2 cells. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013;57:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2013.03.033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alexander B, Bonneau PR, Oliver H, Araz J, Edwards PJ. Development of specific “drug like property” rules for carboxylate containing oral drug candidates. ChemMedChem. 2010;5(12):2102–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201000355.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jia Z-C, Li Y, Zhang L-S. The study of acute toxicity and mutagenicity of astragaloside. Mod Prev Med. 2013;40(6):1032–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pei Luo.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This work was supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) ‘Light of West China’ Program and the Platform of Discovery, Evaluation and Transformation of Active Natural Compounds, Biological Resources Network, CAS.

Conflict of interest

The authors Lin-Sen Qing, Ting-bo Chen, Wen-Xia Sun, Li Chen, Pei Luo, Zhi-Feng Zhang and Li-Sheng Ding have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the Institutional Guidelines and Animal Ordinance (Department of Health, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region) and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Macau University of Science and Technology (Macau Special Administrative Region).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qing, LS., Chen, TB., Sun, WX. et al. Pharmacokinetics Comparison, Intestinal Absorption and Acute Toxicity Assessment of a Novel Water-Soluble Astragaloside IV Derivative (Astragalosidic Acid, LS-102). Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 44, 251–259 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-018-0515-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-018-0515-5

Navigation