Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Prospective Italian validation of the Vaizey and Wexner and fecal incontinence severity index (FISI) questionnaires

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several objective severity measurement questionnaires of the fecal incontinence (FI), are available to describe type, frequency and degree of FI, and their impact on quality of life, aiming to establish baseline scores measure response to treatment over time and allow comparison among patients treated using different strategies. Presently, despite their widespread use in clinical practice, none of these questionnaire have been validated in the Italian language. The aim is to test the translated Italian version of the Vaizey and Wexner and Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) questionnaires assessing their reliability and validity among Italian-speaking patients. Two researchers proficient in spoken English and Italian translated both questionnaires in the Italian language. They independently translated the two questionnaires from English and then they met to produce a single version of the two questionnaires, to solve any possible discrepancy. A forward–backward translation was then obtained by a professional bilingual translator, so as to define the final version of the questionnaires. The questionnaires were independently administered twice to 100 Italian-speaking patients by two different and independent raters. Cronbach’s α of the first and second Vaizey and Wexner questionnaire was 0.755 and 0.727, respectively. While Cronbach’s α of the first and second FISI questionnaire was 0.810 and 0.806, respectively. Spearman correlation and inter-rater reliability were 0.937 and 0.913 for Vaizey and Wexner questionnaire, respectively, and 0.915 and 0.871 for FISI questionnaire, respectively. Italian version of the Vaizey and Wexner and FISI questionnaires proved good consistency, reliability, reproducibility, showing good psychometric properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

All raw data are available if required.

Code availability (software application or custom code)

Not applicable.

References

  1. Bharucha AE, Dunivan G, Goode PS, Lukacz ES, Markland AD, Matthews CA, Mott L, Rogers RG, Zinsmeister AR, Whitehead WE, Rao SS, Hamilton FA (2015) Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and classification of fecal incontinence: state of the science summary for the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) workshop. Am J Gastroenterol 110(1):127–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2014.396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rao SS, American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee (2004) Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee. Am J Gastroenterol 99(8):1585–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40105.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bordeianou LG, Thorsen AJ, Keller DS, Hawkins AT, Messick C, Oliveira L, Feingold DL, Lightner AL, Paquette IM (2023) The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Fecal Incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000002776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitehead WE, Borrud L, Goode PS, Meikle S, Mueller ER, Tuteja A, Weidner A, Weinstein M, Ye W, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (2009) Fecal incontinence in US adults: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterology. 137(2):512–7. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ditah I, Devaki P, Luma HN, Ditah C, Njei B, Jaiyeoba C, Salami A, Ditah C, Ewelukwa O, Szarka L (2014) Prevalence, trends, and risk factors for fecal incontinence in United States adults, 2005–2010. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 12(4):636–43.e1-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cox CK, Schimpf MO, Berger MB (2021) Stigma associated with pelvic floor disorders. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 27(2):e453–e456. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Townsend DC, Carrington EV, Grossi U, Burgell RE, Wong JY, Knowles CH, Scott SM (2016) Pathophysiology of fecal incontinence differs between men and women: a case-matched study in 200 patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 28(10):1580–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12858

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36(1):77–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02050307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44(1):77–80. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.44.1.77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC (1999) Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum 42(12):1525–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, Wexner SD, Bliss D, Lowry AC (2000) Fecal incontinence quality of life scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237236. (discussion 16-7)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Soffer EE, Hull T (2000) Fecal incontinence: a practical approach to evaluation and treatment. Am J Gastroenterol 95(8):1873–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02237.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS (2017) Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth 11(Suppl 1):S80–S89. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3):297–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Balla A, Leone G, Ribichini E, Sacchi MC, Genco A, Pronio A, Paganini AM, Badiali D (2021) Gastroesophageal reflux disease—health-related quality of life questionnaire: prospective development and validation in Italian. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 33(3):339–345. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000001914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. ‘t Hoen LA, Utomo E, Schouten WR, Blok BF, Korfage IJ (2017) The fecal incontinence quality of life scale (FIQL) and fecal incontinence severity index (FISI): validation of the Dutch versions. Neurourol Urodyn. 36(3):710–715. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pace F, Scarlata P, Casini V, Sarzi-Puttini P, Porro GB (2008) Validation of the reflux disease questionnaire for an Italian population of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20(3):187–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0b013e3282f246b2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Giardiello GG, Donelli A, Petrolino M, Villani RD, Masin A, Melega E, Ratto C, Memeo V (2005) Traduzione e validazione prospettica della versione italiana del Fecal Incontinence Quality Of Life (FIQL) index [Italian translation and prospective validation of fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL) index]. Chir Ital 57(2):153–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Resendiz A, Martini G, Sensi B, Reddavid R, Marchiori G, Franco C, Franceschilli M, Imperio N, Sica G, Spolverato G, Degiuli M (2021) The Italian version of the LARS score: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. An Italian Society of Surgical Oncology-Colorectal Cancer Network (SICO-CCN) collaborative study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 36(8):1805–1810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03903-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kucukbas M, Selçuk S, Asoglu MR, Akdemir Y, Karateke A, Cam C (2016) Validation of the fecal incontinence severity index in a Turkish population. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 22(4):283–286. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Piazza Roma 22, 60121, Ancona, Italy

    Monica Ortenzi, Mario Guerrieri & Angelica Reggiani

  2. UOC of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hospital “San Paolo”, Largo Donatori del Sangue 1, Civitavecchia, 00053, Rome, Italy

    Federica Saraceno, Pasquale Lepiane & Andrea Balla

  3. Coloproctology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy

    Pierpaolo Sileri

  4. Coloproctology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy

    Andrea Balla

Authors
  1. Monica Ortenzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mario Guerrieri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Federica Saraceno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Angelica Reggiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pasquale Lepiane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Pierpaolo Sileri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Andrea Balla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MO: study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, critical revision of manuscript. Final approval. MG: study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, critical revision of manuscript. Final approval. FS: study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, critical revision of manuscript. Final approval. AR: study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, critical revision of manuscript. Final approval. PL: study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, critical revision of manuscript. Final approval. PS: study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, critical revision of manuscript. Final approval. AB: study conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting of manuscript, critical revision of manuscript. Final approval.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Balla.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

Informed consent from all participants was obtained.

Consent for publication

All authors approved the publication of the manuscript in the Journal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ortenzi, M., Guerrieri, M., Saraceno, F. et al. Prospective Italian validation of the Vaizey and Wexner and fecal incontinence severity index (FISI) questionnaires. Updates Surg 75, 1617–1623 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01567-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01567-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation