Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Most researchers will eventually have the experience of preparing and submitting a manuscript to an academic journal for peer review. Likewise, most experienced researchers have had papers rejected and faced the famous ‘Reviewer 2’ (shown to have a somewhat unjust reputation [1]).
Having some experience as Editors-In-Chief of this journal (Jamie Trapp 4 years, Martin Caon 11 years), where 50% of submissions are rejected without review and a further 30% are rejected after review, we thought it might be prudent to share some wisdom based on experience. This may help authors through the reviewing and publication process, and to avoid publishing a monstrosity such as a previous effort by one of the current authors [2].
There have been many recent articles with a broader approach than this one [3,4,5,6,7], including some that specifically state what to avoid [8,9,10]. The list provided below (Table 1) is not as broad as these previous articles, instead it focusses on common, specific issues/errors within submissions that arise with editors on a regular basis. It comes from observations as editors, supervisors of many PhDs, and our own experiences and mistakes as researchers. In addition to what is included here, we suggest that researchers also consult other similar articles which have a broader approach (such as those in the reference list and the many others not listed). There are also various resources available through a simple internet search.
The tips given here are presented as into a table of ‘Don’t/Instead’ in an attempt to provide readers with a solution to common mistakes (Table 1). The list is a guideline and far from exhaustive, and in some cases, authors might get published despite doing something from the Don’t list.
Finally, as a disclaimer, we can’t claim that we haven’t done some of the items on the Don’t list, or that we have done all the items on the Instead list, hence the title of the article. Therefore, perhaps Table 1 should be titled ‘Don’t do as I do, instead do as I say’ – if you do that, the most bodacious papers you shall write.
References
Worsham C, Woo J, Zimerman A, Bray CF, Jena AB (2022) An Empiral Assessment of Reviewer 2. INQUIRY: The journal of Health Care Organisation Provision and Financing 59:1–3
Trapp JV (2020) Citations equals research quality? If you agree then don’t cite this stupid, totally terrible article. Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine
Caon M (2018) Revise before review; Reject without review; Reject after review”: why manuscripts are rejected. Australasian Phys Eng Sci Med 41(1):3–5
Ecarnot F, Seronde MF, Chopard R, Schiele F, Meneveau N (2015) Writing a scientific article: A step-by-step guide for beginners. Eur Geriatr Med 6(6):573–579
Iskander JK, Wolicki SB, Leeb RT, Siegel PZ (2018) Successful scientific writing and publishing: A step-by-step approach. Prev Chronic Dis 15(15):180085
Kamtchum-Tatuene J, Tchuisseu-Kwangoua LA, Moko-Tatuene NA, Bigna JJ, Noubiap JJ (2022) Write with the reviewers in mind: Why you got a rejection and how to avoid the next. Stroke 53:e273–e275
Richardson SM, Bella F, Mougel V, Milic J (2021) Scientific writing and publishing for early-career researchers from the perspective of young chemists. J Mater Chem A 9:18674–18680
Caon M (2015) What should not be in a manuscript submitted to a scientific journal. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 38(2):203–204
Sand-Jensen K (2007) How to write consistently boring scientific literature. Oikos 116:723–727
Faber J (2017) Writing scientific manuscripts: Most common mistakes. Dent Press J Orthod 22(5):113–117
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trapp, J., Caon, M. Don’t let Yoda or Bill and Ted write your papers: instead, here’s some tips from some editors on getting your paper published. Phys Eng Sci Med 45, 1025–1027 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-022-01176-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-022-01176-6