Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validating an image segmentation program devised for staging lymphoma

  • Scientific Paper
  • Published:
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hybrid positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET–CT) imaging systems are an important tool for assessing the progression of lymphoma. PET–CT systems offer the ability to quantitatively assess lymphocytic bone involvement throughout the body. There is no standard methodology for staging lymphoma patients using PET–CT images. Automatic image segmentation algorithms could offer medical specialists a means to evaluate bone involvement from PET–CT images in a consistent manner. To devise and validate an image segmentation program that may assist staging lymphoma by determining the degree of bone involvement based from PET–CT studies. A custom-made program was developed to segment regions-of-interest from images by utilising an enhanced fuzzy clustering technique that incorporates spatial information. The program was subsequently tested on digital and physical phantoms using four different performance metrics before being employed to extract the bony regions of clinical PET–CT images acquired from 248 patients staged for lymphoma. The algorithm was satisfactorily able to delineate regions-of-interest within all phantoms. When applied to the clinical PET–CT images, the algorithm was capable of accurately segmenting bony regions in less than half of the subjects (n = 103). The performance of the algorithm was adversely affected by the presence of oral contrast, metal implants and the poor image quality afforded by low dose CT images in general. Significant changes are necessary before the algorithm can be employed clinically in an unsupervised fashion. However, with further work performed, the algorithm could potentially prove useful for medical specialists staging lymphoma in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carbone PP, Kaplan HS, Musshoff K, Smithers DW, Tubiana M (1971) Report of the committee on Hodgkin’s disease staging classification. Cancer Res 31(11):1860–1861

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lister T, Crowther D, Sutcliffe S, Glatstein E, Canellos G, Young R, Rosenberg S, Coltman C, Tubiana M (1989) Report of a committee convened to discuss the evaluation and staging of patients with Hodgkin’s disease: Cotswolds meeting. J Clin Oncol 7(11):1630–1636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ellis ME, Diehl LF, Granger E, Elson E (1989) Trephine needle bone marrow biopsy in the initial staging of Hodgkin disease: sensitivity and specificity of the Ann Arbor staging procedure criteria. Am J Hematol 30(3):115–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moog F, Bangerter M, Kotzerke J, Guhlmann A, Frickhofen N, Reske SN (1998) 18-f-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography as a new approach to detect lymphomatous bone marrow. J Clin Oncol 16(2):603–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barrington SF, Qian W, Somer EJ, Franceschetto A, Bagni B, Brun E, Almquist H, Loft A, Højgaard L, Federico M (2010) Concordance between four European centres of PET reporting criteria designed for use in multicentre trials in Hodgkin lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37(10):1824–1833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA (2009) From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 50(Suppl 1):122S–150S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Elstrom R, Guan L, Baker G, Nakhoda K, Vergilio J-A, Zhuang H, Pitsilos S, Bagg A, Downs L, Mehrotra A (2003) Utility of FDG-PET scanning in lymphoma by WHO classification. Blood 101(10):3875–3876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharma N, Aggarwal LM (2010) Automated medical image segmentation techniques. J Med Phys/Assoc Med Phys India 35(1):3

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arens AI, Troost EG, Hoeben BA, Grootjans W, Lee JA, Grégoire V, Hatt M, Visvikis D, Bussink J, Oyen WJ (2014) Semiautomatic methods for segmentation of the proliferative tumour volume on sequential FLT PET/CT images in head and neck carcinomas and their relation to clinical outcome. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41(5):915–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Belhassen S, Zaidi H (2010) A novel fuzzy C-means algorithm for unsupervised heterogeneous tumor quantification in PET. Med Phys 37(3):1309–1324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zaidi H, Abdoli M, Fuentes CL, El Naqa IM (2012) Comparative methods for PET image segmentation in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39(5):881–891

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chuang K-S, Tzeng H-L, Chen S, Wu J, Chen T-J (2006) Fuzzy c-means clustering with spatial information for image segmentation. Comput Med Imaging Graph 30(1):9–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Okada T, Shimada R, Sato Y, Hori M, Yokota K, Nakamoto M, Chen Y-W, Nakamura H, Tamura S (2007) Automated segmentation of the liver from 3D CT images using probabilistic atlas and multi-level statistical shape model. Med Image Comput Comput-Assist Interv–MICCAI 2007:86–93

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buie HR, Campbell GM, Klinck RJ, MacNeil JA, Boyd SK (2007) Automatic segmentation of cortical and trabecular compartments based on a dual threshold technique for in vivo micro-CT bone analysis. Bone 41(4):505–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Seim H, Kainmueller D, Heller M, Lamecker H, Zachow S, Hege H-C (2008) Automatic segmentation of the pelvic bones from ct data based on a statistical shape Model. VCBM 8:93–100

    Google Scholar 

  16. Krčah M, Székely G, Blanc R (2011) Fully automatic and fast segmentation of the femur bone from 3D-CT images with no shape prior. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2011. IEEE, pp 2087–2090

  17. Wang LI, Greenspan M, Ellis R (2006) Validation of bone segmentation and improved 3-D registration using contour coherency in CT data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25(3):324–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank all the staff from the Department of Nuclear Medicine at St. Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney for their ongoing support and assistance. Special thanks to Andy Young and Dr. Edwin Szeto for their assistance composing this body of work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony Slattery.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Research involving animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Slattery, A. Validating an image segmentation program devised for staging lymphoma. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 40, 799–809 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-017-0587-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-017-0587-6

Keywords

Navigation