Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Revisiting Post-Sterilization Regret in India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

This study analyses the socio-demographic characteristics associated with post-sterilization regret.

Study Design

The study uses cross-sectional data from the fourth round of National Family Health Surveys (2015–2016).

Methods

Simple bivariate and binary logistic regressions analyses were used.

Results

Research shows that 7% of women aged 15–49 reported sterilization regret, which increased by 2% from 2005 to 2016. It was found that factors significantly associated with sterilization regret were years since sterilization, child loss experience, regions of residence, and quality of services. Women who got sterilized at the age of 30 or more were more likely to express regret, than women who were sterilised before 25 years of age, when adjusted for confounding variables (aO.R= 1.006). Women having sons were less likely to report sterilization regret than women who had only daughters (aO.R.=1.3 for each) but on the contrary women having both son and daughter are significantly less likely to express regret in comparison with women having only sons (aO.R. = 0.8 for each. Women who had experienced child loss had higher odds of reporting sterilization regret in rural (aO.R =1.2) as well as in urban (aO.R = 1.3) areas respectively, compared to those who did not experience any child loss.

Conclusion

Women need to be counselled about the permanent nature of sterilization in order to avoid future regret as sterilization is largely dominated by socio-economic conditions. Thus, couples’ decision-making towards using the contraceptive from the basket of choice would help in uplifting the social and cultural status of women in conservative societies and will have a positive effect on contraceptive use. In addition, efforts should be made to educate both the partners equally about contraceptive methods that have higher efficiency. Further, there is also a need to improve the quality of services, both in terms of counselling and service provision. Lastly, health-related policies should tackle disparities in the empowerment, and economic status of women that would result in decreased post-sterilization regret, and will improve sexual relationships following sterilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Sharing Statement

The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. Data are publicly available from the Demographic and Health Survey website: https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm

References

  1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Contraceptive Use. [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2019 Apr 26]. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/family/contraceptive-2009.pdf.

  2. Nervo P, Bawin L, Foidart JM, et al. Regret after tubal sterilization. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2000;29:485–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmidt JE, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, et al. Requesting information about and obtaining reversal after tubal sterilization: findings from the US Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:892–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Visaria L, Jejeebhoy S, Merrick T. From family planning to reproductive health: challenges facing India. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 1999;25:S44–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Srinivasan K. Regulating reproduction in India’s population: efforts, results, and recommendations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Srinivasan K. Population and family planning programmes in India: a review and recommendations. In: Lect 5th Dr C Chandrasekaran Meml Lect Ser Febr. 2006;3.

  7. Jamieson D. Poststerilization regret: findings from India and the United States. Indian J Med Sci. 2007;61:359–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Malhotra N, Chanana C, Garg P. Post-sterilization regrets in Indian women. Indian J Med Sci. 2007;61:186–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ludermir AB, Machado KMdM, da Costa AM, et al. Tubal ligation regret and related risk factors: findings from a case-control study in Pernambuco State, Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2009;25:1361–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh A, Ogollah R, Ram F, et al. Sterilization regret among married women in India: implications for the Indian national family planning program. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012;38:187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eeckhaut MC, Sweeney MM. The perplexing links between contraceptive sterilization and (dis) advantage in ten low-fertility countries. Popul Stud. 2016;70:39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dhungana A, Nanthamongkolchai S, Pitikultang S. Factors related to intention to undergo female sterilization among married women in Rural Kathmandu, Nepal. Nepal J Epidemiol. 2016;6:539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pallikadavath S, Rajan SI, Wilson C. Impact of low fertility and early age at sterilisation on women’s formal education and skill development in South India. J Popul Res. 2016;33:199–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pallikadavath S, Wilson C. A paradox within a paradox: scheduled caste fertility in Kerala. Econ Polit Wkly. 2005;40:3085–93.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sample registration system statistical report 2016. Registrar General, India; 2016.

  16. De Oliveira IT, Dias JG, Padmadas SS. Dominance of sterilization and alternative choices of contraception in India: an appraisal of the socioeconomic impact. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e86654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Heil SH, Gaalema DE, Herrmann ES. Incentives to promote family planning. Prev Med. 2012;55:S106–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leone T, Padmadas SS. The proliferation of female sterilization in Brazil and India A comparative analysis of the cohort and parity effects. Genus. 2007;LXIII:77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Matthews Z, Padmadas S, Hutter I, et al. Does early childbearing and a sterilization-focused family planning programme in India fuel population growth? Demogr Res. 2009;20:693–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lipetz C, Phillips CJ, Fleming CF. The cost-effectiveness of a long-acting reversible contraceptive (Implanon®) relative to oral contraception in a community setting. Contraception. 2009;79:304–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mavranezouli I. The cost-effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods in the UK: analysis based on a decision-analytic model developed for a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical practice guideline. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1338–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Trussell J, Hassan F, Lowin J, et al. Achieving cost-neutrality with long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Contraception. 2015;91:49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Health Technology Assessment of Long Acting Reversible Contraceptives in India|Department of Health Research|MoHFW|Government of India [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jul 5]. https://dhr.gov.in/health-technology-assessment-long-acting-reversible-contraceptives-india.

Download references

Funding

This research received no grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Himanshu Chaurasia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval for this study was not sought as this study was based on secondary data.

Informed Consent

The study used the data set that is available online in the public domain; hence, there was no need to seek ethical consent to publish this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Gargi Pal is a Research Associate in National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi, India; Himanshu Chaurasia is a Scientist B (Statistician) in National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health, ICMR, Parel, Mumbai, India.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pal, G., Chaurasia, H. Revisiting Post-Sterilization Regret in India. J Obstet Gynecol India 70, 295–303 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-020-01309-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-020-01309-5

Keywords

Navigation