Abstract
Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the USA. Many internal medicine physicians feel uncomfortable having to prognosticate; however, oncology patients often ask this of them. The inability to provide an accurate prognosis could lead a patient to make a treatment decision incongruent with their true wishes. We conducted this study to assess resident and attending physicians’ knowledge of cancer prognosis and to establish the source of residents’ knowledge. We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study to assess internal medicine resident and attending physician knowledge of median survival for seven different oncologic case scenarios. Correct answers were defined by results of randomized, phase III trials. Residents were asked to identify the source(s) of information that most significantly influenced their choices. All residents and attending physicians affiliated with the University of Hawaii were invited to participate. A total of 67 of 85 surveys (78.8%) were completed, representing 41 residents and 26 attending physicians. Overall, the respondents correctly estimated median survival 42.6% of the time. The respondents underestimated more often than overestimated median survival (46.3% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.0001). Seventy-three percent of residents cited inpatient experience as influencing their oncologic knowledge. Internal medicine residents and attending physicians correctly estimate median survival of cancer patients less than 50% of the time and often underestimate survival. Inpatient rotations, where residents care for the oncologic patients experiencing significant complications of their cancer and treatment, may be giving them an unbalanced perspective on cancer prognosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Leading causes of death. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm. Published March 17, 2017. Accessed April 19, 2017
Weir H, Thompson T, Soman A, Møller B, Leadbetter S (2015) The past, present, and future of cancer incidence in the United States: 1975 through 2020. Cancer 121(11):1827–1837
Christakis N, Iwashyna T (1998) Attitude and self-reported practice regarding prognostication in a national sample of internists. Arch Intern Med 158(21):2389–2395
Glare P (2003) A systematic review of physicians’ survival predictions in terminally ill cancer patients. BMJ 327(7408):195–190
Clement-Duchene C, Carnin C, Guillemin F, Martinet Y (2010) How accurate are physicians in the prediction of patient survival in advanced lung cancer? Oncologist 15(7):782–789
Cheon S, Agarwal A, Popovic M, Milakovic M, Lam M, Fu W, DiGiovanni J, Lam H, Lechner B, Pulenzas N, Chow R, Chow E (2016) The accuracy of clinicians’ predictions of survival in advanced cancer: a review. Ann Palliat Med 5(1):22–29
Goldvaser H, Milman Y, Dujovni T, Stern A, Mahamid M, Hanovich E, Zivony A, Shochat T, Yerushalmi R, Gafter-Gvili A, Brenner B, Shepshelovich D (2016) Perception of prognosis of cancer patients by non-oncologists. Int J Clin Pract 70(12):1027–1032
Lam PT (2008) Accuracy of clinical prediction of survival in a palliative care unit. Prog Palliat Care 16(3):113–117
Kondziolka D, Parry P, Lunsford L et al (2014) The accuracy of predicting survival in individual patients with cancer. J Neurosurg 120(1):24–30
Heinemann V et al (2014) FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15(10):1065–1075
Scheithauer W, Rosen H, Kornek GV, Sebesta C, Depisch D (1993) Randomised comparison of combination chemotherapy plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. BMJ 306(6880):752–755
Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, Feng J, Liu XQ, Wang C, Zhang S, Wang J, Zhou S, Ren S, Lu S, Zhang L, Hu C, Hu C, Luo Y, Chen L, Ye M, Huang J, Zhi X, Zhang Y, Xiu Q, Ma J, Zhang L, You C (2015) Final overall survival results from a randomised, phase III study of erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802). Ann Oncol 26(9):1877–1883
Yang JC-H, Wu Y-L, Schuler M, Sebastian M, Popat S, Yamamoto N, Zhou C, Hu C-P, O’Byrne K, Feng J, Lu S, Huang Y, Geater SL, Lee KY, Tsai C-M, Gorbunova V, Hirsh V, Bennouna J, Orlov S, Mok T, Boyer M, Su W-C, Lee KH, Kato T, Massey D, Shahidi M, Zazulina V, Sequist LV (2015) Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-lung 3 and LUX-lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol 16(2):141–151
Sandler A et al (2006) Paclitaxel–carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 355(24):2542–2550
Scagliotti GV et al (2008) Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non–small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(21):3543–3551
Oettle H et al (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer. JAMA 297(3):267–277
von Minckwitz G et al (2010) Impact of treatment characteristics on response of different breast cancer phenotypes: pooled analysis of the German neo-adjuvant chemotherapy trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat 125(1):145–156
Bergh J et al (2012) FACT: an open-label randomized phase III study of fulvestrant and anastrozole in combination compared with anastrozole alone as first-line therapy for patients with receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(16):1919–1925
Crook JM, O’Callaghan CJ, Ding K, et al: A phase III randomized trial of intermittent versus continuous androgen suppression for PSA progression after radical therapy (NCIC CTG PR.7/SWOG JPR.7/CTSU JPR.7/UK Intercontinental Trial CRUKE/01/013). 2011 ASCO Annual Meeting. Abstract 4514. Presented June 6, 2011
Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, et al: CALGB/SWOG 80405: Phase III trial of irinotecan/5-FU/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5-FU/leucovorin (mFOLFOX6) with bevacizumab (BV) or cetuximab (CET) for patients (pts) with KRAS wild-type (wt) untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum (MCRC). 2014 ASCO Annual Meeting. Abstract LBA3. Presented June 1, 2014
American Society of Clinical Oncology (2015) The State of Cancer Care in America, 2015: a report by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Oncol Pract 11(2):79–113
Chen H et al (2007) What did you think of the hematology/oncology rotation? A survey of internal medicine residents. J Cancer Educ 2(1):50–55
McFarland DC et al (2015) Inpatient hematology-oncology rotation is associated with a decreased interest in pursuing an oncology career among internal medicine residents. J Oncol Pract 11(4):289–295
McFarland DC et al (2017) Acute empathy decline among resident physician trainees on a hematology-oncology ward: an exploratory analysis of house staff empathy, distress, and patient death exposure. Psycho-oncology 26:698–703
Weinberger SE (2006) Redesigning training for internal medicine. Ann Intern Med 144(12):910–915 Web
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This study was conducted in compliance with the protocol approved by the Research and Institutional Review Committee and according to Good Clinical Practice standards, applicable federal regulations, and the Queen’s Medical Center research institutional policies and procedures.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix. Survey questions
Appendix. Survey questions
For the following patients, select the letter that corresponds with the median survival for patients with their type of cancer. Assume excellent performance status and an age of 60 years.
-
1.
Stage IV colon cancer with unresectable liver and lung metastases treated with chemotherapy:
-
a.
≤6 months
-
b.
10-12 months
-
c.
24-36 months
-
d.
48-60 months
-
a.
-
2.
Stage IV colon cancer with unresectable liver and lung metastases, patient declines chemotherapy:
-
a.
≤6 months
-
b.
10-12 months
-
c.
24-36 months
-
d.
48-60 months
-
a.
-
3.
Stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with an EGFR mutation, no brain metastases:
-
a.
≤6 months
-
b.
10-12 months
-
c.
24-36 months
-
d.
48-60 months
-
a.
-
4.
Stage IV lung adenocarcinoma without an EGFR mutation, no brain metastases:
-
a.
≤6 months
-
b.
10-12 months
-
c.
24-36 months
-
d.
48-60 months
-
a.
-
5.
Stage II pancreatic cancer treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy:
-
a.
≤6 months
-
b.
10-12 months
-
c.
24-36 months
-
d.
48-60 months
-
a.
-
6.
Stage IV prostate cancer with asymptomatic bone metastases to the lumbar spine and ribs:
-
a.
≤6 months
-
b.
10-12 months
-
c.
24-36 months
-
d.
48-60 months
-
a.
-
7.
Stage IV breast cancer, bone is the only metastatic site, estrogen receptor positive, HER2 negative:
-
a.
≤6 months
-
b.
10-12 months
-
c.
24-36 months
-
d.
48-60 months
-
a.
Applies to residents only:
-
8.
What are your sources of cancer knowledge that you used to answer the questions above? Check all that apply.
-
a.
knowledge obtained during interactions with inpatient physicians
-
b.
knowledge obtained during interactions with outpatient physicians
-
c.
knowledge obtained during interactions with oncologists
-
d.
knowledge obtained while on an oncology rotation
-
e.
personal readings
-
f.
medical school experience
-
g.
personal experience with patients
-
h.
a colleague’s experience with patients
-
i.
personal experience with family/friends
-
j.
Other: ___________________
-
a.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Belyea, L., Acoba, J.D. Internal Medicine Residents’ Perception of Cancer Prognosis. J Canc Educ 35, 983–987 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01552-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01552-z