Skip to main content
Log in

Physical activity for children in elementary schools: time for a rethink?

  • Practice and Public Health Policies
  • Published:
Translational Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

In spite of the well-known benefits of physical activity, the vast majority of children in North America do not meet current international guidelines for accumulating sufficient health-enhancing physical activity. Indeed, despite considerable attention to this population health crisis, the current prevalence of inactivity, along with its concomitant health consequences, shows little sign of abating. In this paper, we identify acknowledged barriers to wide scale physical activity adoption and maintenance at the population level among children and propose a viable tripartite framework (albeit one that would require political support) that we hope will provide the basis for debate and implementation. We emphasize that each of these considerations, in isolation, would be insufficient to substantively address the problem, but when combined would ensure that all elementary school children (without any medical contraindication) are sufficiently active, rather than the minority of this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Troiano, R. P., Berrigan, D., Dodd, K. W., Mâsse, L. C., Tilert, T., & McDowell, M. (2008). Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc., 40(1), 181–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Colley, R. C., Garriguet, D., Janssen, I., Craig, C. L., Clarke, J., & Tremblay, M. S. (2011). Physical activity of Canadian children and youth: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Catalogue no. 82-003-XPE. Health Rep., 22(1), 15–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Janssen, I., & Leblanc, A. G. (2010). Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phy Act., 7, 40. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-7-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Metcalfe, B., Henley, W., & Wilkin, T. (2012). Effectiveness of intervention on physical activity of children: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials with objectively measured outcomes (EarlyBird 54). Brit Med J, 345, e5888. doi:10.1136/bmj.e5888.

  5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2010). (Accessed May 24, 2015, at http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/downloads/PA_State_Indicator_Report_2010.pdf) State indicator report on physical activity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

  6. Perna, F. M., A, O., JF, C., et al. (2012). The association of State law to physical education time association in US public schools. Am J Public Health, 102(8), 1594–1599. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300587.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Morgan, P. J., & Hansen, V. (2008). Classroom teachers’ perceptions of the impact of barriers to teaching physical education on the quality of physical education programs. Res Quart Exerc Sport, 79(4), 506–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J, Tremblay MS. Physical activity of Canadian adults: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Catalogue no. 82-003-XPE. Health Rep. 2011;(1):7–14.

  9. O'Connor, T. M., Jago, R., & Baranowski, T. (2009). Engaging parents to increase youth physical activity: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med., 37, 141–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pate, R. R., Davis, M. G., Robinson, T. N., Stone, E. J., McKenzie, T. L., & Young, J. C. (2006). Promoting physical activity in children and youth: a leadership role for schools: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Physical Activity Committee) in collaboration with the Councils on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young and Cardiovascular Nursing. Circulation., 114(11), 1214–1224. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.177052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Contreras, R. Obama pushes longer school days, shorter breaks. Washington Times. Sept 29, 2009. (Accessed May 24, 2015, at http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/29/obama-pushes-longer-school-days-shorter-breaks/?page=all).

  12. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. School Redesign: MA Expanded Learning Time (ELT). (Accessed May 24, 2015, at http://www.doe.mass.edu/redesign/elt/).

  13. Sellgren K. Budget sets out academies plan and longer school day. British Broadcasting Corporation March 16, 2016. (Accessed April 15, 2016, at http://www.bbc.com/news/education-35815023).

  14. Singh, A., Uijtdewilligen, L., Twisk, J. W., van Mechelen, W., & Chinapaw, M. J. (2012). Physical activity and performance at school: a systematic review of the literature including a methodological quality assessment. Arch Pediat Adol Med, 166(1), 49–55. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Faulkner, G., & Reeves, C. (2000). Primary school student teachers’ physical self-perceptions and attitudes toward teaching physical education. J Teach Phys Educ., 19, 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). University of Rochester Press: Rochester (NY).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Moon, I. S. (2012). Experimentally based, longitudinally designed, teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy supportive toward their students. J Sport Exerc Psychol, 34(3), 365–396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Telama, R., Yang, X., Viikari, J., Välimäki, I., Wanne, O., & Raitakari, O. (2005). Physical activity from childhood to adulthood: a 21-year tracking study. Am J Prev Med., 28(3), 267–273. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2004.12.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Warburton, D. E. R., Nicol, C. W., & Bredin, S. S. D. (2006). Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Can Med Assoc J., 174(6), 801–809. doi:10.1503/cmaj.051351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Carlson, S. A., Fulton, J. E., Pratt, M., et al. (2014). Inadequate physical activity and health care expenditures in the United States. Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 57(4), 315–323. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2014.08.002.

  21. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychol, 50, 741–749. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwartz, B. (2015). Why we work. NY: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors can confirm that the manuscript has not been previously published and is not being simultaneously submitted elsewhere. As the submission is a commentary paper, no primary data were collected and so no statements are necessary with regard to previous reporting of data, control of primary data, human rights and informed consent related to study participants, the Declaration of Helsinki, and IRB approval. Mark R. Beauchamp is supported by a Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Scholar Award as well as through funds from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Ryan E. Rhodes is supported by a Canadian Cancer Society Senior Scientist Award and the Give to Live organization as well as through funds from the Canadian Cancer Society, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Claudio N. Nigg is supported by funds from the National Institutes of Health, the United States Department of Agriculture, and the Hawaii Medical Services Association Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark R. Beauchamp PhD CPsychol.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beauchamp, M.R., Rhodes, R.E. & Nigg, C.R. Physical activity for children in elementary schools: time for a rethink?. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 7, 64–68 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-016-0443-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-016-0443-3

Keywords

Navigation