Skip to main content
Log in

Transdisciplinary translational behavioral (TDTB) research: opportunities, barriers, and innovations

  • Essay
  • Published:
Translational Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

The translation of basic behavioral science discoveries into practical strategies represents a promising approach to developing more effective preventive interventions to improve health. Since translational research inevitably involves making use of diverse perspectives from multiple disciplines, it is best conducted as a transdisciplinary enterprise. In this paper, we discuss current strategies used by NIH to support transdisciplinary translational behavioral (TDTB) research, summarize successful efforts, and highlight challenges encountered in conducting such work (ranging from conceptual to organizational to methodological). Using examples from NIH-funded projects we illustrate the potential benefits of, and barriers to, pursuing this type of research and discuss next steps and potential future directions for NIH-supported TDTB research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fishbein DH, Sussman S, Ridenour T, Stahl M. The full translational spectrum of prevention science: facilitating the transfer of knowledge to practices and policies that prevent behavioral health problems, translational behavioral medicine. Transl Behav Med. 2016

  2. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004; 291(10): 1238-1245.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schroeder SA. We can do better—Improving the health of the American people. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 1221-1228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bryan AD, Magnan RM, Nilsson R, Marcus BH, Tompkins SA, Hutchison KE. The big picture of individual differences in physical activity behavior change: a transdisciplinary approach. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2011; 12: 20-26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. PubMed bibliography for Caryn Lerman PhD. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/myncbi/browse/collection/40748322/?sort=date&direction=descending&http%3A%2F%2Fwww.med.upenn.edu%2Fapps%2Ffaculty%2Findex.php%2Fg275%2Fp11960=. Accessibility verified November 4, 2015.

  6. Hall KA, Stokols D, Stipelman BA, et al. Assessing the value of team science: a study comparing center-and investigator-initiated grants. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 42(2): 157-163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lerman C, Schnoll RA, Hawk LW, PGRN-PNAT Research Group, et al. Use of the nicotine metabolite ratio as a genetically informed biomarker of response to nicotine patch or varenicline for smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2015; 3(2): 131-138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lerman C, Gu H, Loughead J, Ruparel K, Yang Y, Stein EA. Large scale brain network coupling predicts acute nicotine abstinence effects on craving and cognitive function. JAMA Psychiatr. 2014; 71(5): 523-530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Loughead J, Ray R, Wileyto EP, et al. Effects of the α4β2 partial agonist varenicline on brain activity and working memory in abstinent smokers. Biol Psychiatry. 2010; 67(8): 715-721.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Epstein LH, Fletcher KD, O’Neill J, et al. Food characteristics, long-term habituation and energy intake. Laboratory and field studies. Appetite. 2013; 60: 40-50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gordon RS. An operational classification of disease prevention. Public Health Rep. 1983; 98(2): 107-109.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. Preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people. Washington: National Academies Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Friedman LM, Furberg C, DeMets DL, eds. Fundamentals of clinical trials. New York, NY:Springer Science & Business Media; 2008.

  14. Lipsky MS, Sharp LK. From idea to market: the drug approval process. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001; 14(5): 362-367.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rounsaville BJ, Carroll KM, Onken LS. A stage model of behavioral therapies research: getting started and moving on from stage I. Clin Psychol-Sci Pract. 2001; 8: 133-142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Onken LS, Carroll KM, Shoham V, Cuthbert BN, Riddle M. Reenvisioning clinical science: unifying the discipline to improve the public health. Clin Psychol-Sci Pract. 2014; 2(1): 22-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Czajkowski SM, Powell LH, Adler N, et al. From ideas to efficacy: the ORBIT Model for developing behavioral treatments for chronic diseases. Health Psychol. 2015; 34(10):971-982.

  18. Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, Brownson RC. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43: 337-350.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Greenwald P, Cullen JW. The new emphasis in cancer control. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1985; 74: 543-551.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Flay BR. Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Prev Med. 1986; 15: 451-474.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Committee on the Science of Team Science. Introduction. In: Cooke NJ, Hilton ML, eds. Enhancing the effectiveness of team science. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Balas E, Boren S. Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. In: Bemmel J, McCray AT, eds. Section 1: health and clinical management. In yearbook of medical informatics: patient centered systems. Stuttgart: Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft; 2000: 65-70.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research—“blue highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA. 2007; 297(4): 403-406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Trochim W, Kane C, Graham MJ, Pincus HA. Evaluating translational research: a process marker model. Clin Transl Sci. 2011; 4(3): 153-162.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Glasgow RE, Emmons KM. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007; 28: 413-433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Klesges LM, Estabrooks PA, Dzewaltowski DA, Bull SS, Glasgow RE. Beginning with the application in mind: designing and planning health behavior change interventions to enhance dissemination. Ann Behav Med. 2005; 29(Suppl): 66-75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Okamoto J, Stipelman BA, Huang G, Hall KL. Comparison and trends in research collaboration: Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Centers co-authorship network properties, 1999–2015. Bethesda, MD: Poster presented at: Sixth Annual International Science of Team Science Conference; 2015

  28. Stipelman BA, Hall KL, Zoss AM, Okamoto J, Stokols D, Borner K. Mapping the impact of transdisciplinary research: a visual comparison of investigator initiated and team based tobacco use research publications. J Transl Med Epidemiol. 2014; 2(2): 10331-10337.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vogel AL, Stipelman BA, Hall KL, Stokols D, Nebeling L, Spruijt-Metz D. Pioneering the transdisciplinary team science approach: lessons learned from National Cancer Institute grantees. J Transl Med Epidemiol. 2014; 2014; 2(2): 1027, p1-13.

  30. Schully SD, Benedicto CB, Gillanders EM, Wang SS, Khoury MJ. Translational research in cancer genetics: the road less traveled. Public Health Genomics. 2011; 14(1): 1-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. National Research Counci. Bridging disciplines in the brain, behavioral, and clinical sciences. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  32. National Research Counci. Enhancing the effectiveness of team science. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lei H, Nahum-Shani I, Lynch K, Oslin D, Murphy SA. A “SMART” design for building individualized treatment sequences. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2012; 8: 21-48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chakraborty B, Collins LM, Strecher V, Murphy SA. Developing multicomponent interventions using fractional factorial designs. Stat Med. 2009; 28: 2687-2708.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Navarro-Barrientos JE, Rivera DE, Collins LM. A dynamical systems model for understanding behavioral interventions and body composition change. Math Comput Model Dyn Syst. 2001; 17(2): 183-203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Howe GW, Beach SRH, Brody GH. Microtrial methods for translating gene-environment dynamics into preventive interventions. Prev Sci. 2010; 11(4): 343-354.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan M Czajkowski Ph.D.

Ethics declarations

Compliance with ethical standards

This paper does not involve the use of human subjects or animals. As such, no informed consent was necessary.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Implications

Policy: Funders, reviewers, editors and others who wish to promote and support TDTB research can use the highlighted exemplars funded by NIH to inform the development of structures and systems that better support TDTB research.

Research: Examples provided highlight concrete ways in which TDTB projects, research programs, and initiatives can be designed and implemented at all phases of the translational spectrum.

Practice: Investigators and translational partners engaged in TDTB research can leverage the recommendations proposed in this paper to advance and promote the area of TDTB research.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Czajkowski, S.M., Lynch, M.R., Hall, K.L. et al. Transdisciplinary translational behavioral (TDTB) research: opportunities, barriers, and innovations. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 6, 32–43 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0367-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0367-3

Keywords

Navigation