Skip to main content
Log in

Bridging barriers to clinic-based HIV testing with new technology: translating self-implemented testing for African American youth

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Translational Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Numerous barriers to clinic-based HIV testing exist (e.g., stigmatization) for African American youth. These barriers may be addressed by new technology, specifically HIV self-implemented testing (SIT). We conducted a series of formative phase 3 translation studies (49 face-to-face interviews, 9 focus groups, 1 advisory panel review) among low-income African American youth (15–19 years) and providers of adolescent services in two US cities to identify potential translation difficulties of the OraQuick SIT. Based on content analysis, we found that providers and African American youth viewed SITs positively compared to clinic-based testing. Data suggest that SITs may reduce social stigma and privacy concerns and increase convenience and normalization of HIV testing. Challenges with SIT implementation include difficulties accessing confirmatory testing, coping with adverse outcomes, and instructional materials that may be inappropriate for low socioeconomic status (SES) persons. Study results underscore the need for translation studies to identify specific comprehension and implementation problems African American youth may have with oral SITs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chang LW, Serwadda D, Quinn TC, Wawer MJ, Gray RH, Reynolds SJ. Combination implementation for HIV prevention: moving from clinical trial evidence to population-level effects. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013; 13(1): 65-76.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Obama BH. National HIV/AIDS strategy for the United States. July 2010; http://aids.gov/federal-resources/national-hiv-aids-strategy/nhas.pdf.

  3. Vermund SH, Hayes RJ. Combination prevention: new hope for stopping the epidemic. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2013:1–18.

  4. Office of National AIDS Policy. National HIV/AIDS strategy: update of 2011–2012 federal efforts to implement the national HIV/AIDS strategy. 2012. http://aids.gov/federal-resources/national-hiv-aids-strategy/implementation-update-2012.pdf.

  5. Kulkarni SP, Shah KR, Sarma KV, Mahajan AP. Clinical uncertainties, health service challenges, and ethical complexities of HIV “test-and-treat”: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2013; 103(6): e14-e23.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. UNAIDS. Global report UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic 2010; http://www.unaids.org/globalreport/documents/20101123_GlobalReport_full_en.pdf.

  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Strategic plan division of HIV/AIDS prevention 2011 through 2015. 2011. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/strategy/dhap/pdf/dhap-strategic-plan.pdf.

  8. Viall AH, Dooley SW, Branson BM, et al. Results of the expanded HIV testing initiative—25 jurisdictions, United States, 2007–2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2011, 60(24):805-810. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/wk/mm6024.pdf.

  9. Fortenberry JD, McFarlane M, Bleakley A, et al. Relationships of stigma and shame to gonorrhea and HIV screening. Am J Public Health. 2002; 92(3): 378-381.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hightow-Weidman LB. Missteps, misunderstandings, and missed opportunities: HIV testing among young African Americans. Sex Transm Dis. 2009; 36(9): 592.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hyden C, Allegrante JP, Cohall AT. HIV testing sites, communication about adolescent confidentiality: potential barriers and facilitators to testing. Health Promot Pract. 2014; 15: 173-180.

  12. Johns MM, Bauermeister JA, Zimmerman MA. Individual and neighborhood correlates of HIV testing among African American youth transitioning from adolescence into young adulthood. AIDS Educ Prev. 2010; 22(6): 509-522.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Joseph HA, Fasula AM, Morgan RL, et al. “The anticipation alone could kill you”: past and potential clients’ perspectives on HIV testing in non-health care settings. AIDS Educ Prev. 2011; 23(6): 577-594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Peralta L, Deeds BG, Hipszer S, Ghalib K. Barriers and facilitators to adolescent HIV testing. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2007; 21(6): 400-408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pai NP, Sharma J, Shivkumar S, et al. Supervised and unsupervised self-testing for HIV in high-and low-risk populations: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2013; 10(4): e1001414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dolcini M, Dowhower D, Towner SL, Harper G, Catania J. Bridging barriers to clinic-based HIV/STI testing with new technology: at home testing for youth. San Francisco: Annual Meeting Society of Behavioral Medicine; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mavedzenge SN, Baggaley R, Corbett EL. A review of self-testing for HIV: research and policy priorities in a new era of HIV prevention. Clin Infect Dis. 2013; 57(1): 126-138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Meyerson BE, Ryder PT, von Hippel C, Coy K. We can do more than just sell the test: pharmacist perspectives about over-the-counter rapid HIV tests. AIDS Behav. 2013:1–5.

  19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance, 2008 2009, November. http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats08/exordium.htm.

  20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV surveillance report, 2010 2012a;22. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/surveillance/resources/reports/2010report/index.htm.

  21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV surveillance in adolescents and young adults [PowerPoint slides]. 2012b. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/slides/adolescents/index.htm.

  22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV and AIDS among African American youth. 2012c. http://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/newsroom/docs/2012/CDC-AA-Youth-0612-508.pdf.

  23. Rangel MC, Gavin L, Reed C, Fowler MG, Lee LM. Epidemiology of HIV and AIDS among adolescents and young adults in the United States. J Adolesc Health. 2006; 39(2): 156-163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Trepka MJ, Kim S. Prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus testing and high-risk human immunodeficiency virus behavior among 18 to 22 year-old students and nonstudents: results of the national survey of family growth. Sex Transm Dis. 2010; 37(10): 653-659. 610.1097/OLQ.1090b1013e3181e1091a1766.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hall HI, An Q, Hutchinson AB, Sansom S. Estimating the lifetime risk of a diagnosis of the HIV infection in 33 states, 2004–2005. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008; 49(3): 294-297. 210.1097/QAI.1090b1013e3181893f3181817.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cubbin C, Santelli J, Brindis C, Braveman P. Neighborhood context and sexual behaviors among adolescents: findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2005; 37: 125-134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Crosby R, DiClemente R, Wingood G, et al. Predictors of infection with Trichomonas vaginalis: a prospective study of low income African-American adolescent females. Sex Transm Infect. 2002; 78: 360-364.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ellen J, Lane M, McCright J. Are adolescents being screened for sexually transmitted diseases? A study of low income African American adolescents in San Francisco. Sex Transm Infect. 2000; 76: 94-97.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen M, Rhodes PH, Hall HI, Kilmarx PH, Branson BM, Valleroy LA. Prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection among persons aged ≥13 years—National HIV Surveillance System, United States, 2005–2008. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, use of selected clinical preventive services among adults—United States, 2007–2010. 2012;61:57–64. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/other/su6102.pdf.

  30. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV testing in the United States baseline report 2002–2006: baseline report September 2012. 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/reports/pdf/AHITS_Baseline_Report.pdf.

  31. Swenson RR, Rizzo CJ, Brown LK, et al. Prevalence and correlates of HIV testing among sexually active African American adolescents in four US cities. Sex Transm Dis. 2009; 36(9): 584.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Food and Drug Administration. OraQuick® in-home HIV test summary of safety and effectiveness. 2012.

  33. Food and Drug Administration. OraQuick package insert. 2012.

  34. Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. 2005. http://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/sites/nirn.fpg.unc.edu/files/resources/NIRN-MonographFull-01-2005.pdf. Accessed 12/4/2012.

  35. Glasgow RE, Steiner JF. Comparative effectiveness research to accelerate translation: recommendations for an emerging field of science. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, eds. Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012: 72-93.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Glasgow RE, Vinson C, Chambers D, Khoury MJ, Kaplan RM, Hunter C. National institutes of health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102(7): 1274-1281.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Catania J, Dolcini M. A social-ecological perspective on vulnerable youth: toward an understanding of sexual development among urban African American. Res Hum Dev. 2012; 9(1): 1-8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dolcini M, Catania J, Harper G, Boyer C, Richards KAM. Sexual health information networks: what are urban African American youth learning? Res Hum Dev. 2012; 9(1): 54-77.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Stern PN. Are counting and coding a cappella appropriate in qualitative research? In: Morse JM, ed. Qualitative nursing research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1991: 146-163.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9): 1277-1288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Catania JA, Dolcini MM, Gandelman A, Narayanan V, McKay V. Impact of the economic downturn on HIV/STI prevention program fidelity. Transl Behav Med. 2015.

  43. Bastian LA, Nanda K, Hasselblad V, Simel DL. Diagnostic efficiency of home pregnancy test kits. Arch Fam Med. 1998; 7(5): 465-469.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hicks JM, Iosefsohn M. Reliability of home pregnancy-test kits in the hands of laypersons. N Engl J Med. 1989; 320(5): 320.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nettleman MD, Brewer JR, Ayoola AB. Self-testing for pregnancy among women at risk: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(2): 150-153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wallace LS, Zite NB, Homewood VJ. Making sense of home pregnancy test instructions. J Womens Health. 2009; 18(3): 363-368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008; 41(3–4): 327-350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Conte KP, Catania JA, McKay V, Dolcini M. Impact of time restraints on program fidelity in a counseling and testing HIV intervention. San Francisco: American Public Health Association; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Dolcini MM, Gandelman AA, Vogan SA, et al. Translating HIV interventions into practice: community-based organizations’ experiences with the diffusion of effective behavioral interventions (DEBIs). Soc Sci Med. 2010; 71(10): 1839-1846.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Gandelman A, Dolcini M. The influence of social determinants on evidence-based behavioral interventions—considerations for implementation in community settings. Transl Behav Med. 2012; 2(2): 137-148.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Geng E, Nash D, Kambugu A, et al. Retention in care among HIV-infected patients in resource-limited settings: emerging insights and new directions. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2010; 7(4): 234-244.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Remien RH, Hirky AE, Johnson MO, Weinhardt LS, Whittier D, Le GM. Adherence to medication treatment: a qualitative study of facilitators and barriers among a diverse sample of HIV+ men and women in four US cities. AIDS Behav. 2003; 7(1): 61-72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Veniegas RC, Kao UH, Rosales R, Arellanes M. HIV prevention technology transfer: challenges and strategies in the real world. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(S1).

  54. Catania J, Dolcini M, Dowhower D, Harper G, Teixeria N, Dolcini-Catania L. Dissemination of at home HIV testing to high-risk urban African American youth: barriers and solutions. Boston: American Public Health Association Annual Meeting; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Dolcini M, Catalia JA, Gandelman A. Translating research into practice: the influence of organizational and client factors on fidelity of an evidence-based program. New Orleans: Annual Meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development grant number HD061027. The Institutional Review Boards for Oregon State University, DePaul University, and Harder and Company, and all sponsoring institutions approved study procedures. We would like to thank the Science Division of OraSure Inc. for providing background information on the OraQuick HIV tests. We wish to acknowledge the contribution of Carla Cudmore for editorial and manuscript preparation and the study participants for their time and commitment.

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. Catania Ph.D..

Additional information

Implications

Practice: African American youth in low-income urban areas find oral self-implemented HIV testing desirable, but both youth and service providers of this population see potential translation problems that need to be resolved (e.g., implementation fidelity) before wider dissemination is possible.

Policy: Oral testing has the potential to supplement clinic-based testing in reaching national testing goals.

Research: Research is needed to examine barriers to implementation fidelity, identify strategies for improving fidelity, and investigate potential negative outcomes (e.g., negative emotional responses) to self-implemented testing.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Catania, J.A., Dolcini, M.M., Harper, G.W. et al. Bridging barriers to clinic-based HIV testing with new technology: translating self-implemented testing for African American youth. Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res. 5, 372–383 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0331-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0331-2

Keywords

Navigation