Abstract
Background
Radium-223, an alpha-emitting therapeutic radiopharmaceutical, prolongs overall survival (OS) in patients with symptomatic bone-predominant metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). PSMA PET/CT is a molecular imaging tool for whole-body imaging of prostate cancer and may inform on the mechanisms of radium-223 activity and treatment resistance in mCRPC patients.
Methods
In an open-label, single-arm, prospective trial, we enrolled patients with bone-predominant mCRPC to undergo baseline PSMA PET/CT, 6 cycles of radium-223, and post-therapy PSMA PET/CT. We assessed the relationship between multiple parameters of interval change on PSMA PET/CT on aPROMISE PSMA automated analysis and a human reader, and laboratory measurements.
Results
Fourteen patients were enrolled and 9 patients completed both protocol-defined PSMA PET/CT. Of the 9 evaluable patients, 1 (11%) had a complete response and 8 (89%) had PSMA PET progressive disease. All patients showed decreases in PSMA uptake in some disease sites evident on the baseline scan. The change in overall burden of disease on PSMA PET was more strongly correlated with changes in PSA (ρ = 0.95) than ALP (ρ = 0.62). Progression in bone was a common finding on post-treatment PSMA PET/CT.
Conclusion
PSMA PET was able to assess response in individual lesions during radium-223 therapy in mCRPC patients. PSMA PET responses in previously established disease sites were universal, but most patients also showed overall PSMA PET progression during 6 cycles of radium-223. Given high correlation with changes in PSA, PSMA PET may be of limited value in follow-up during or after radium-223 in bone-predominant mCRPC.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Contact the corresponding author for data requests.
References
Suominen MI, Fagerlund KM, Rissanen JP, Konkol YM, Morko JP, Peng Z, et al. Radium-223 inhibits osseous prostate cancer growth by dual targeting of cancer cells and bone microenvironment in mouse models. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(15):4335–46.
Dorff TB, Stein C, Kortylewski M, Posadas E, Synold T, Quinn D. Evaluating changes in immune function and bone microenvironment during radium-223 treatment of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2020;35(7):485–9.
Parker C, Nilsson S, Heinrich D, Helle SI, O’Sullivan JM, Fosså SD, et al. Alpha emitter radium-223 and survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:213–23.
Sartor O, Coleman RE, Nilsson S, Heinrich D, Helle SI, O’Sullivan JM, et al. An exploratory analysis of alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, and prostate-specific antigen dynamics in the phase 3 ALSYMPCA trial with radium-223. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(5):1090–7.
Sidhu A, Zalewski P, Kapoor A, Fleshner N, Chow E, Emmenegger U. Analysis of prevalence and prognostic implications of early versus delayed PSA declines during radium-223 (Ra223) treatment among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Am J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(6_suppl):117–117.
Prelaj A, Rebuzzi SE, Buzzacchino F, Pozzi C, Ferrara C, Frantellizzi V, et al. Radium-223 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: efficacy and safety in clinical practice. Oncol Lett. 2019;17(2):1467–76.
Evans JC, Malhotra M, Cryan JF, O’Driscoll CM. The therapeutic and diagnostic potential of the prostate specific membrane antigen/glutamate carboxypeptidase II (PSMA/GCPII) in cancer and neurological disease. Br J Pharmacol. 2016;173(21):3041–79.
Wright GL, Grob BM, Haley C, Grossman K, Newhall K, Petrylak D, et al. Upregulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen after androgen-deprivation therapy. Urology. 1996;48:326–34.
Hope TA, Goodman JZ, Allen IE, Calais J, Fendler WP, Carroll PR. Metaanalysis of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET accuracy for the detection of prostate cancer validated by histopathology. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(6):786–93.
Kingsley LA, Fournier PGJ, Chirgwin JM, Guise TA. Molecular biology of bone metastasis. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6(10):2609–17.
Eiber M, Herrmann K, Calais J, Hadaschik B, Giesel FL, Hartenbach M, et al. Prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation (PROMISE): proposed miTNM Classification for the Interpretation of PSMA-Ligand PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2018 Mar;59(3):469–78. Erratum in: J Nucl Med. 2018 Jun;59(6):992.
Fanti S, Hadaschik B, Herrmann K. Proposal of systemic therapy response assessment criteria in time of PSMA PET/CT imaging: PSMA PET Progression (PPP). J Nucl Med. 2020;61(5):678–82.
Iagaru AH, Mittra E, Colletti PM, Jadvar H. Bone-targeted imaging and radionuclide therapy in prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(Supplement 3):19S-24S.
Pollen JJ, Witztum KF, Ashburn WL. The flare phenomenon on radionuclide bone scan in metastatic prostate cancer. Am J Roentgenol. 1984;142:773–6.
Scher HI, Morris MJ, Stadler WM, Higano CS, Halabi S, Smith MR, et al. The Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) consensus for trials in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Am J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:15.
Aggarwal R, Wei X, Kim W, Small EJ, Ryan CJ, Carroll P, et al. Heterogeneous flare in prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography tracer uptake with initiation of androgen pathway blockade in metastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018;1(1):78–82.
Kuppen MC, Westgeest HM, van der Doelen MJ, van den Eertwegh AJ, Coenen JL, Aben KK, et al. Real-world outcomes of radium-223 dichloride for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Future Oncol. 2020;16(19):1371–84.
Parikh S, Murray L, Kenning L, Bottomley D, Din O, Dixit S, et al. Real-world outcomes and factors predicting survival and completion of radium 223 in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2018;30:548–55.
Anand A, Trägårdh E, Edenbrandt L, Beckman L, Svensson JH, Thellenberg C, et al. Assessing radiographic response to 223Ra with an automated bone scan index in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(5):671–5.
Ahmadzadehfar H, Azgomi K, Hauser S, Wei X, Yordanova A, Gaertner FC, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET as a gatekeeper for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with 223Ra: proof of concept. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(3):438–44.
Grubmüller B, Senn D, Kramer G, Baltzer P, D’Andrea D, Grubmüller KH, et al. Response assessment using 68Ga-PSMA ligand PET in patients undergoing 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:1063–72.
Alipour R, Azad A, Hofman MS. Guiding management of therapy in prostate cancer: time to switch from conventional imaging to PSMA PET? Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019;20(11):1–14.
Grubmüller B, Rasul S, Baltzer P, Fajkovic H, D’Andrea D, Berndl F, et al. Response assessment using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA ligand PET in patients undergoing systemic therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate. 2020;80:74–82.
Markowski MC, Velho PI, Eisenberger MA, Pomper MG, Pienta KJ, Gorin MA, et al. Detection of early progression with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving bipolar androgen therapy. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(9):1270–3.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge Aline Mamo for her untiring administrative support.
Funding
This study was supported by a grant of 43,555 $CAD funded by Bayer Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Each author contributed to data analysis, writing, editing, and final review of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the IRB of CIUSSS West-Central Montreal, Jewish General Hospital, A-903 3755, Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1E2, under protocol no. 17–029. IRB-approved written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Conflict of Interest
Stephan Probst reports funding for the current study from Bayer Inc. as his only conflict of interest. Aseem Anand reports being an employee of Exini Diagnostics AB as his only conflict of interest. Anders Bjartell, Tayna Skamene, and Cristiano Ferrario report that they have no conflict of interest. No other declarations by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Key Points
• Question: Can PSMA PET/CT inform on the response to radium-223 in mCRPC patients?
• Pertinent findings: PSMA PET appears to be able to assess response in individual lesions during radium-223, and the overall change in burden of disease on PSMA PET is highly correlated with changes in PSA.
• Implications for patient care: PSMA PET may be of limited value at present to follow mCRPC patients undergoing radium-223 therapy outside of a clinical trial but further research could evaluate the eventual incorporation of PSMA PET in this clinical scenario.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Probst, S., Bjartell, A., Anand, A. et al. Interval Changes in PSMA PET/CT During Radium-223 Therapy for Metastatic Bone Disease from Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 56, 188–195 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-022-00754-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-022-00754-6