Abstract
Paddler ability in kayaking is reflected through boat motion. Through the application of accelerometers, an easy to use and readily available assessment tool, the current study attempts to determine whether skill level can be ascertained through such measures in order to better assess performance and training. In all, 79 male canoe sprint kayakers participated in this study and paddled a 200 m straight course. According to the time they finished the course, they were divided into three skill level groups and labelled as slow, moderate, and fast speed. Tri-axial boat acceleration data were recorded using an accelerometer system mounted on the back of the kayak. The maximum and standard deviation of boat acceleration along superoinferior, mediolateral, and anteroposterior axes were compared among the three groups. Mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) test revealed that maximum and standard deviation of acceleration data along the superoinferior axis were significantly greater in the fast speed group than in the moderate and slow ones, and higher in the moderate group than in slow one. These findings suggest that the kayaker’s body movements will eventually be reflected in the boat’s total acceleration, which could be a measure of overall performance. Given that accelerometers are a small, portable, and easy-to-use devices, and that the results of this study also revealed that boat acceleration differs between different skill groups, it appears that studying acceleration time series in real competition and outside of laboratory environments could open a new window into kayak research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adesida, Y., Papi, E., & McGregor, A. H. (2019). Exploring the role of wearable technology in sport kinematics and kinetics: a systematic review. Sensors, 19(7), 1–26.
Bartlett, R., Wheat, J., & Robins, M. (2007). Is movement variability important for sports biomechanists? Sports Biomechanics, 6(2), 224–243.
Brown, B. M., Lauder, M., & Dyson, R. (2011). Notational analysis of sprint kayaking: Differentiating between ability levels. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 11(1), 171–183.
Cao, C., Liu, Y., Ji, L., & Chen, X. (2011). Research on the quantitative evaluation of cooperation between boat and oar in canoe. In International Conference on Future Computer Science and Education, Xi’an, China.
Chambers, R., Gabbett, T. J., Cole, M. H., & Beard, A. (2015). The use of wearable microsensors to quantify sport-specific movements. Sports Medicine, 45(7), 1065–1081.
Croft, H., & Ribeiro, D. C. (2013). Developing and applying a tri-axial accelerometer sensor for measuring real time kayak cadence. Procedia Engineering, 60, 16–21.
Fernandes, R. A., Alacid, F., Gomes, A. B., & Gomes, B. B. (2021). Validation of a global positioning system with accelerometer for canoe/kayak sprint kinematic analysis. Sports Biomechanics. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2021.2005128.
Gomes, B. B., Ramos, N. V., Conceição, F. A., Sanders, R. H., Vaz, M. A., & Vilas-Boas, J. P. (2015). Paddling force profiles at different stroke rates in elite sprint kayaking. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 31(4), 258–263.
Harbourne, R. T., & Stergiou, N. (2009). Movement variability and the use of nonlinear tools: principles to guide physical therapist practice. Physical Therapy, 89(3), 267–282.
Helmer, R., Farouil, A., Baker, J., & Blanchonette, I. (2011). Instrumentation of a kayak paddle to investigate blade/water interactions. Procedia Engineering, 13, 501–506.
Janssen, I., & Sachlikidis, A. (2010). Validity and reliability of intra-stroke kayak velocity and acceleration using a GPS-based accelerometer. Sports Biomechanics, 9(1), 47–56.
Kurz, M. J., Stergiou, N., & Blanke, D. (2003). Spanning set defines variability in locomotive patterns. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 41(2), 211–214.
Li, M. (2017). The progress of biomechanical researches in kayaking. Yangtze Medicine, 1(01), 30–44.
McDonnell, L., Hume, P., & Nolte, V. (2012). Sprint kayaking stroke rate reliability, variability and validity of the digitrainer accelerometer compared to GoPro video measurement. In ISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive.
Pickett, C. W., Abbiss, C., Zois, J., & Blazevich, A. J. (2021). Pacing and stroke kinematics in 200‑m kayak racing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 39(10), 1096–1104.
Redwood-Brown, A., Brown, H., Oakley, B., & Felton, P. (2021). Determinants of boat velocity during a 200 m race in elite paralympic sprint kayakers. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2021.1986351.
Robinson, M. G., Holt, L. E., Pelham, T. W., & Furneaux, K. (2011). Accelerometry measurements of sprint kayaks: the coaches’ new tool. International Journal of Coaching Science, 5(1), 45–56.
Umek, A., & Kos, A. (2018). Wearable sensors and smart equipment for feedback in watersports. Procedia Computer Science, 129, 496–502.
Vadai, G., & Gingl, Z. (2016). Can the fluctuations of motion be used to estimate the performance of kayak paddlers? Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2016(5), 1–10.
Vadai, G., Gingl, Z., Mingesz, R., & Makan, G. (2013a). Performance estimation of kayak paddlers based on fluctuation analysis of movement signals. In 2013 22nd International Conference on Noise and Fluctuations (ICNF), Montpellier, France.
Vadai, G., Makan, G., Gingl, Z., Mingesz, R., Mellár, J., Szépe, T., & Csamangó, A. (2013b). On-water measurement and analysis system for estimating kayak paddlers’ performance. In 2013 36th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia.
Worsey, M. T., Espinosa, H. G., Shepherd, J. B., & Thiel, D. V. (2019). A systematic review of performance analysis in rowing using inertial sensors. Electronics, 8(11), 1–16.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Iranian National Canoe Sprint Coaches and Kayak team members. We also gratefully acknowledge the support of the Iranian Canoeing, Rowing and Sailing Federation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
E. Karami, M.A. Sanjari, S. Boozari and A. Sarshin declare that they have no competing interests.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants or on human tissue were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All participants signed an informed consent form approved by the Islamic Azad University ethics committee before participating in this study.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Karami, E., Sanjari, M.A., Boozari, S. et al. Level of kayakers’ skills influence their boat acceleration time series. Ger J Exerc Sport Res 53, 309–314 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-022-00864-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-022-00864-5