Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Acute unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries: quality of life comparison between patients managed operatively with a coracoclavicular suspension device arthroscopically placed versus patients managed non-operatively

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Abstract

Purpose

The main aim was to compare the quality of life (QoL) of patients with acute unstable acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries (grade IIIB-V according to the ISAKOS diversification of the Rockwood classification), managed operatively with a coracoclavicular suspension device arthroscopically placed versus the QoL of patients managed non-operatively, 24 months or more after shoulder injury. The secondary aims were to describe the prevalence of scapular dyskinesis in each group of treatment and to assess its relation to the magnitude of shoulder pain.

Methods

Patients with acute unstable ACJ injuries managed operatively or non-operatively, between 2008 and 2012 were included. Grade IIIA and IIIB injuries were differentiated. Grade IIIA injuries were excluded. The QoL was evaluated by means of the Health Survey questionnaire (SF36), the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, assessed at the initial visit post-injury and at the last follow-up visit. The difference between values registered at these different moments was calculated. The Constant score, the global satisfaction (scale from 0 to 10), and the presence of scapular dyskinesis were assessed at the last follow-up visit. The VAS was stratified according to the presence or absence of scapular dyskinesis. Comparison between groups was performed. In the SURG-group, the development of secondary displacements was radiologically evaluated.

Results

Forty-one patients were included: 21 CONS-group (4 Rockwood IIIB and 17 V) and 20 SURG-group (3 Rockwood IIIB, 3 IV, and 14 V). The mean age was 37 [19–55] years, and the mean follow-up was 36 [24–90] months. The difference between the questionnaires assessed at the last follow-up visit and at the initial visit post-injury was: (1) physical SF36 score (CONS-group 18.6 ± 6.1 and SURG-group 28.1 ± 6.9, p = 0.001); (2) mental SF36 score (CONS-group 10.8 ± 11.2 and SURG-group 10.6 ± 6.8, p = 0.960); (3) VAS (CONS-group −7.3 ± 1.7 and SURG-group −7.7 ± 1.2, p = 0.412); (4) DASH questionnaire (CONS-group −55.7 ± 9.8 and SURG-group −77.4 ± 9,5, p = 0.020). The mean Constant score assessed at the last follow-up visit was (CONS-group 91.1 ± 7.4 and SURG-group 95.3 ± 2.5, p = 0.020). The mean global satisfaction registered at the last follow-up visit was (CONS-group 8.5 ± 1.7 and SURG-group 8.9 ± 0.9, p = 0.371). There was evidence of scapular dyskinesis in 52.4 % (11/21) of the patients of the CONS-group and in 15 % (3/20) of the patients of the SURG-group (p = 0.030). The mean VAS registered at the last follow-up visit in the group of patients that developed scapular dyskinesis was 2 ± 0.96 and in the group of patients with normal scapular motion 0.3 ± 0.47 (p = 0.000). In the SURG-group, anatomic reduction of the ACJ was finally achieved in 60 % (12/20) of the patients; vertical subluxations were observed in 20 % (4/20); and complete dislocations were observed in 20 % (4/20).

Conclusion

Patients with acute unstable ACJ injuries managed operatively with a coracoclavicular suspension device arthroscopically placed have a better quality of life in terms of the physical SF36, DASH, and Constant score, than patients managed non-operatively, 24 months or more after shoulder injury. Although the global satisfaction is not different between groups, the prevalence of scapular dyskinesis is greater in the group of patients managed non-operatively and the scapular dyskinesis is significantly associated to a higher pain.

Level of evidence: level III, retrospective cohort study

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pallis M, Cameron KL, Svoboda SJ, Owens BD (2012) Epidemiology of acromioclavicular joint injury in young athletes. Am J Sports Med 40:2072–2077

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beitzel K, Cote MP, Apostolakos J, Solovyova O, Judson CH, Ziegler CG, Edgar CM, Imhoff AB, Arciero RA, Mazzocca AD (2013) Current concepts in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthroscopy 29:387–397. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gumina S, Carbone S, Postacchini F (2009) Scapular dyskinesis and SICK scapula syndrome in patients with chronic type III acromioclavicular dislocation. Arthroscopy 25:40–45. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2008.08.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weinstein DM, McCann PD, McIlveen SJ, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU (1995) Surgical treatment of complete acromioclavicular dislocations. Am J Sports Med 23:324–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rolf O, Hann von Weyhern A, Ewers A, Boehm TD, Gohlke F (2008) Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III–V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:1153–1157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beitzel K, Mazzocca AD, Bak K, Itoi E, Kibler WB, Mirzayan R, Imhoff AB, Calvo E, Arce G, Shea K (2014) ISAKOS upper extremity committee consensus statement on the need for diversification of the Rockwood classification for acromioclavicular joint injuries. Arthroscopy 30:271–278. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2013.11.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosenorn M, Pedersen EB (1974) A comparison between conservative and operative treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. Acta Orthop Scand 45:50–59

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cardone D, Brown JN, Roberts SN, Saies AD, Hayes MG (2002) Grade III acromioclavicular joint injury in Australian Rules Football. J Sci Med Sport 5:143–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Galpin RD, Hawkins RJ, Grainger RW (1985) A comparative analysis of operative versus nonoperative treatment of grade III acromioclavicular separations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 193:150–155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacobs B, Wade PA (1966) Acromioclavicular-joint injury. An end-result study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 48:475–486

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Calvo E, Lopez-Franco M, Arribas IM (2006) Clinical and radiologic outcomes of surgical and conservative treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint injury. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15:300–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. MacDonald PB, Alexander MJ, Frejuk J, Johnson GE (1988) Comprehensive functional analysis of shoulders following complete acromioclavicular separation. Am J Sports Med 16:475–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Taft TN, Wilson FC, Oglesby JW (1987) Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. An end-result study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:1045–1051

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gstettner C, Tauber M, Hitzl W, Resch H (2008) Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation: surgical versus conservative treatment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:220–225

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Walsh WM, Peterson DA, Shelton G, Neumann RD (1985) Shoulder strength following acromioclavicular injury. Am J Sports Med 13:153–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bakalim G, Wilppula E (1975) Surgical or conservative treatment of total dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. Acta Chir Scand 141:43–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Larsen E, Hede A (1987) Treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. Three different methods of treatment prospectively studied. Acta Orthop Belg 53:480–484

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Press J, Zuckerman JD, Gallagher M, Cuomo F (1997) Treatment of grade III acromioclavicular separations. Operative versus nonoperative management. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 56:77–83

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Larsen E, Bjerg-Nielsen A, Christensen P (1986) Conservative or surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. A prospective, controlled, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:552–555

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bannister GC, Wallace WA, Stableforth PG, Hutson MA (1989) The management of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. A randomised prospective controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 71:848–850

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29:602–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Constant CR, Murley AHG (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 214:160–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rockwood CA Jr, Williams GR Jr, Young DC (1998) Disorders of the acromioclavicular joint. In: Rockwood CA Jr, Matsen FA 3rd (eds) The shoulder. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 483–553

    Google Scholar 

  25. Uhl TL, Kibler WB, Gecewich B, Tripp BL (2009) Evaluation of clinical assessment methods for scapular dyskinesis. Arthroscopy 25:1240–1248. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2009.06.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Luis GE, Yong CK, Singh DA, Sengupta S, Choon DS (2007) Acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a comparative biomechanical study of the palmaris-longus tendon graft reconstruction with other augmentative methods in cadaveric models. J Orthop Surg 2:22

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Phemister PB (1942) The treatment of dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint by open reduction and threaded wire fixation. J Bone Joint Surg 24:166–168

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bahk MS, Kuhn JE, Galatz LM, Connor PM, Williams GR Jr (2010) Acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular injuries and clavicular, glenoid, and scapular fractures. Instr Course Lect J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:209–226

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sim E, Schwarz N, Hocker K, Berzlanovich A (1995) Repair of complete acromioclavicular separations using the acromioclavicular-hook plate. Clin Orthop Relat Res 314:134–142. doi:10.1097/00003086-199505000-00017

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Trainer G, Arciero RA, Mazzocca AD (2008) Practical management of grade III acromioclavicular separations. Clin J Sport Med 18:162–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schlegel TF, Burks RT, Marcus RL, Dunn HK (2001) A prospective evaluation of untreated acute grade III acromioclavicular separations. Am J Sports Med 29:699–703

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Murena L, Canton G, Vulcano E, Cherubino P (2013) Scapular dyskinesis and SICK scapula syndrome following surgical treatment of type III acute acromioclavicular dislocations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1146–1150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Natera L, Sarasquete J, Abat F (2014) Anatomic reconstruction of chronic coracoclavicular ligament tears: arthroscopic-assisted approach with nonrigid mechanical fixation and graft augmentation. Arthrosc Tech 3(5):e583–e588. doi:10.1016/j.eats.2014.06.014. eCollection 2014

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Arrigoni P, Brady PC, Zottarelli L, Barth J, Narbona P, Huberty D, Koo SS, Adams CR, Parten P, Denard PJ, Burkhart SS (2014) Associated lesions requiring additional surgical treatment in Grade 3 acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthroscopy 30:6–10. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2013.10.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Salzmann GM, Walz L, Buchmann S, Glabgly P, Venjakob A, Imhoff AB (2010) Arthroscopically assisted 2-bundle anatomical reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint separations. Am J Sports Med 38:1179–1187. doi:10.1177/0363546509355645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Natera L, Sarasquete J, Besalduch M, Petrica A, Escolà A, Fallone J (2015) Horizontal and vertical stabilization of acute unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries arthroscopy-assisted. Arthrosc Tech. doi:10.1016/j.eats.2015.07.014

  37. Abat F, Sarasquete J, Natera LG, Calvo Á, Pérez-España M, Zurita N, Ferrer J, Del Real JC, Paz-Jimenez E, Forriol F (2015) Biomechanical analysis of acromioclavicular joint dislocation repair using coracoclavicular suspension devices in two different configurations. J Orthop Traumatol. doi:10.1007/s10195-015-0346-y

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Street Sant Quintí 89, 08026, Barcelona, Spain

    Luis Natera Cisneros, Juan Sarasquete Reiriz & Marina Besalduch

  2. Hospital General de Catalunya, Street Pedro i Pons 1, 08190, Sant Cugat del Vallés, Barcelona, Spain

    Luis Natera Cisneros

  3. Hospital Quirón Teknon, Street Vilana 12, 08022, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain

    Juan Sarasquete Reiriz

  4. CEREDE – Sports Medicine®, Street Dr. Roux, 8-10, 08017, Barcelona, Spain

    Ferran Abat

  5. Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Street Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain

    Juan Carlos Monllau

  6. Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Plaça de la Mercè 10-12, 08002, Barcelona, Spain

    Sebastian Videla

Authors
  1. Luis Natera Cisneros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan Sarasquete Reiriz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ferran Abat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marina Besalduch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Juan Carlos Monllau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sebastian Videla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Natera Cisneros.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Natera Cisneros, L., Sarasquete Reiriz, J., Abat, F. et al. Acute unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries: quality of life comparison between patients managed operatively with a coracoclavicular suspension device arthroscopically placed versus patients managed non-operatively. Eur Orthop Traumatol 6, 343–355 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-015-0326-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-015-0326-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation