Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III–V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The management of acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ-) injuries especially of type III is still controversial.

Methods

In this retrospective study the results of early ACJ reconstructions immediately after trauma (group early repair, ER) were compared with the results of delayed reconstructions in patients who first got conservative treatment and failed after some time (group delayed repair, DR). Overall, 49 patients were analysed clinically and radiographically with a mean follow-up of 53 months (range 20–92). In group ER twenty-nine patients were treated with a modified Phemister technique according to Mayr including a PDS coracoclavicular sling and temporary K- wire fixation. In group DR twenty patients were treated with a modified Weaver–Dunn-procedure with additionally transposition of the coracoacromial ligament and AC-joint resection.

Results

A comparison of the overall results revealed a statistically significant better outcome in the early repair group, regarding the Constant Score, the degree of acromioclavicularjoint-reduction, numbers of complications and patient`s satisfaction.

Conclusion

Our results point out that early reconstruction of ACJ-injuries in type III–V avoids the inferior clinical results of delayed reconstructions using a modified Weaver–Dunn-procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bannister GC, Wallace WA, Stableforth PG, Hutson MA (1989) The management of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. A randomised prospective controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:848–850

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bathis H, Tingart M, Bouillon B, Tiling T (2000) Conservative or surgical therapy of acromioclavicular joint injury: what is reliable? A systematic analysis of the literature using “evidence-based medicine” criteria. Chirurg 71:1082–1089

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bradley JP, Elkousy H (2003) Decision making: operative versus nonoperative treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries. Clin Sports Med 22:277–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Calvo E, Lopez-Franco M, Arribas IM (2006) Clinical and radiologic outcomes of surgical and conservative treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint injury. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15(3):300–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fremerey RW, Lobenhoffer P, Ramacker K, Gerich T, Skutek M, Bosch U (2001) Acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation-operative or conservative therapy? Unfallchirurg 104:294–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guy DK, Wirth MA, Griffin JL, Rockwood CA Jr (1998) Reconstruction of chronic and complete dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 347:138–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hedtmann A, Fett H, Ludwig J (1998) Management of old neglected posttraumatic acromioclavicular joint instability and arthrosis. Orthopade 27(8):556–566

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lancaster S, Horowitz M, Alonso J (1987) Complete acromioclavicular separations. Clin Orthop 216:80–88

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Larsen E, Bjerg-Nielsen A, Christensen P (1986) Conservative or surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation: a prospective, controlled, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:552–555

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mayr E, Braun W, Eber W, Ruter A (1999) Treatment of acromioclavicular joint separations. Central Kirschner-wire and PDS-augmentation. Unfallchirurg 102(4):278–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meislin RJ, Zucherman JD, Nainzadeh N (1992) Type III acromioclavicular joint separation associated with late brachial-plexus neurapraxia. J Orthop Trauma 6:370–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mouhsine E, Garofalo R, Crevoisier X, Farron A (2003) Grade I and II acromioclavicular dislocations: results of conservative treatment. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12(6):599–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nuber GW, Bowen MK (1997) Acromioclavicular joint injuries and distal clavicle fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 5:11–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Phemister PB (1942) The treatment of dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint by open reduction and threaded wire fixation. J Bone Joint Surg 24:166–168

    Google Scholar 

  15. Philips AM, Smart C, Groom AF (1988) Acromioclavicular dislocation. Conservative or surgical therapy. Clin Orthop 353:10–17

    Google Scholar 

  16. Press J, Zuckerman JD, Gallagher M, Cuomo F (1997) Treatment of grade III acromioclavicular separations. Operative versus nonoperative management. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 56:77–83

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rawes ML, Dias JJ (1996) Long-term results of conservative treatment for acromioclavicular dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(3):410–412

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rockwood CA Jr, Williams GR, Young DC (1996) Injuries to the Acromioclavicular Joint. In: Rockwood CA Jr, Green DP, Buchholz RW, Heckman JD (eds) Fractures in adults. Lippincott Raven, Philadelphia, pp 1341–1413

    Google Scholar 

  19. Taft TN, Wilson FC, Oglesby JW (1991) Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. An end-result study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:1045–1051

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tibone J, Sellers R, Tonino P (1992) Strength testing after third-degree acromioclavicular dislocations. Am J Sports Med 20:328–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Weaver JK, Dunn HK (1972) Treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54(6):1187–1194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wojtys EM, Nelson G (1991) Conservative treatment of grade III acromioclavicular dislocations. Clin Orthop 268:112–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zeiler G (1994) Die operative Behandlung der akromioklavikulären Luxation. Operat Orthop Traumatol 6: 38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, König-Ludwig Haus Würzburg, Brettreichstr. 11, 97084, Würzburg, Germany

    Olaf Rolf, Andreas Hann von Weyhern, Alexander Ewers, Thomas Dirk Boehm & Frank Gohlke

Authors
  1. Olaf Rolf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Hann von Weyhern
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander Ewers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thomas Dirk Boehm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Frank Gohlke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olaf Rolf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rolf, O., Hann von Weyhern, A., Ewers, A. et al. Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III–V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment . Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128, 1153–1157 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0524-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0524-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation