Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of generalized loss functions for rapid estimation of flood damages: a case study in Kelani River basin, Sri Lanka

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Applied Geomatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assessment of infrastructural vulnerability to natural hazards, and subsequent economic loss, can make important contributions to future disaster risk minimization. The recent endeavor is to ascertain and evaluate risk globally, which can provide a framework to identify unique regional vulnerabilities, the mobilization of international investments, and cross-country risk comparison. This would require a concerted effort for the detailed classification of building exposures and vulnerability models. This study presents the design and efficacy of flood-vulnerability models for structural building types. The study uses an empirical approach, with data gathered from survey questionnaire, for direct estimation of flood damages in the Kelani River basin in Sri Lanka. Survey questionnaires were administered in the flood-prone areas of the basin, and depth-damage functions were established for four (4) structural building types that were identified based on the relationship between inundation depths and flood damage ratio. Event-based flood hazards were simulated using the Flo-2D model. Building exposures and densities were derived from remote sensing data, using integrated thematic land cover feature indices and supervised image classification. A modified mathematical loss model was employed to simulate flood damages to each building category for a disastrous flood event in the Kelani River basin. Simulated damages and post-flood survey showed reasonable comparativeness. The models can be employed for loss estimation of future damages and risk-reduction planning for flood disaster in Sri Lanka.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad S, Avtar R, Sethi M, Surjan A (2016) Delhi’s land cover change in post transit era. Cities 50:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed I, Gerlach RM Distributed flow guided dydraulic modeling of a desert river system for flood control, in Proceedings River Flow 2012, Costa Rica San Jose, 2012, 1, Taylor and Francis Group, LLc, p. 1007–1015

  • Avtar R, Takeuchi W, Sawada H (2013) Full polarimetric PALSAR-based land cover monitoring in Cambodia for implementation of REDD policies. Int J Digital Earth 6(3):255–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatti SS, Tripathi NK (2014) Built-up area extraction using Landsat 8 OLI imagery. GI Sci Remote Sens 51(4):445–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cammerer H, Thieken A (2013) Historical development and future outlook of the flood damage potential of residential areas in the Alpine Lech Valley (Austria) between 1971 and 2030. Reg Environ Chang 13(5):999–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cammerer H, Thieken AH, Lammel J (2013) Adaptability and transferability of flood loss functions in residential areas. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13(11):3063–3081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Census (2012) Census of Pupolation and Housing: Department of Census and Statistics, Ministry of Finance and Planning

  • Chow VT (1959) Open-channel hydraulics. Blackburn Press, Calwell

  • de Moel H, Asselman NEM, Aerts JCJH (2012) Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of coastal flood damage estimates in the west of the Netherlands. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12(4):1045–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Silva MMGT, Weerakoom SB, Herath S, Ratnayake UR (2012) Event Based Flood Modeling in Lower Kelani Basin, in Proceedings SAITM Research Symposium on Engineering Advancements, Malabe, Sri Lanka

  • DMC (2010) Integrated Post Flood Assessment: Disaster Management Centre, Ministry of Disaster Management

  • Dutta D, Herath S (2001) GIS Based Flood Loss Estimation Modeling in Japan, in Proceedings Proceedings of the US-Japan 1st Workshop on Comparative Study on Urban Disaster Management, Port Island, Kobe, Japan, February 2001

  • Dutta D, Herath S, Musiake K (2003) A mathematical model for flood loss estimation. J Hydrol 277(1–2):24–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta D, Kamrujjaman Serker NHM (2005) Urban building inventory development using very high resolution remote sensing data for urban risk analysis. Int J Geoinform 1(1):109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta D, Nakayama K (2009) Effects of spatial grid resolution on river flow and surface inundation simulation by physically based distributed modelling approach. Hydrol Process 23(4):534–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flo-2D (2009) Flo-2D Reference manual, in FLO-2D Software, I., ed.: Nutrioso

  • Freni G, La Loggia G, Notaro V (2010) Uncertainty in urban flood damage assessment due to urban drainage modelling and depth-damage curve estimation. Water Sci Technol—WST 61(12):2979–2993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giang NT, Chen J, Phuong TA (2009) A method to construct flood damage map with an application to Houng River basin, Central Vietnam. VNU J Sci, Earth Sci 25:10–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisten M, Davdge D (2005) Flood damage estimation in the Upper Themes River Watershed. University of Western Ontario and University of Waterloo, Waterloo

    Google Scholar 

  • Herath S, Dutta D, Musiake K (1999) Flood damage estimation of an urban catchment using remote sensing and GIS, in Proceedings International Conference on Urban Storm Drainage, Volume 4, p. 2177–2185

  • Herath S, Hirose N, Matsuda S (1992) A process model for basin hydrological modelling and its application, in Proceedings Japan Annual Conference of Society of Water Resources and Hydrology,, p. 146–149

  • Herath S, Hirose N, Musiake K (1990) A computer package for the estimation infiltration capacities of shallow infiltration facilities, in Proceedings 5tt International Conference on Urban Storm Drainage, Japan, p. 111–118

  • Herath S, Ni G, Babar B, and Musiake K (1995), Investigation of scaling effect in hydrologic modeling using distributed hydrologic models, in Proceedings 2nd Study Conference on GEWEX Asian Monsoon Experiment, Thailland, 6–10, March 1995, p. 207–211

  • Herath, S., and Wang, Y., 2009, Incorporating wind damage in potential flood loss estimation: Global Environmental Research p. 151–159

  • Islam MM, Ado KS (2000) Flood damage and management modelling using satellite remote sensing data with GIS: case study of Bangladesh, in Proceedings Remote Sensing and Hydrology 2000 (Proceedings of a symposium held at April 2000). IAHS Publ. no. 267, 2001, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA,

  • James L, Hall B (1986) Risk information for floodplain management. J Water Resour Plann Manag 112(4):485–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongman B, Kreibich H, Apel H, Barredo JI, Bates PD, Feyen L, Gericke A, Neal J, Aerts JCJH Ward PJ, (2012) Comparative flood damage model assessment: towards a European approach: Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.,, v. 12, p. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.,

  • Jonkman SN, Bočkarjova M, Kok M, Bernardini P (2008) Integrated hydrodynamic and economic modelling of flood damage in the. Netherlands: Ecological Economics 66(1):77–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, I., and Spence, R., 2004, An overview of flood actions on buildings: Eng Geol, v. 73, no. 3–4, p. 297–309

  • Kimura K, Ishimi K, Sato S, Fukuda T, Mikami T, Kikuchi S (2006) Verification of tsunami wave source model and formulation of vulnerability function for buildings based on the investigation of actual damage due to the Sumatran earthquake and tsunami: subject area bein the damage at Matara city. Sri Lanka: Costal Eng Committee 53:301–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Komolafe AA, Srikantha H, Avtar R, (2015) Sensitivity of flood damage estimation to spatial resolution: journal of flood risk management, p. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr1113.12224

  • Kreibich H, Thieken AH, Petrow T, Muller M, Merz B (2005) Flood loss reduction of private households due to building precautionary measures—lessons learned from the Elbe flood in August 2002. Natural Hazards Earth Syst Sci 5(1):117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maktav D, Erbek FS, Jurgens C (2005) Remote sensing of urban areas. Int J Remote Sens 26(4):655–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masqsood T, Wehner M, Ryo H, Edwards M, Dale K, Miller V (2013) GAR 15 Regional Vulnerability Functions: Reporting on the UNISDR/GA SE Asian Regional Workhop on Structural Vulnerability Models for GAR Global Risk Assessment, 11–14 November, 2013, : Geoscience Australia

  • Merz B, Kreibich H, Schwarze R, Thieken AH (2010) Assessment of economic flood damage. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:1697–1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Irrigation Resources, S. L., 2009, Proposed Kaluganga Multipulse development Project.: Department of Irrigation, Water Resources abd Planning, Ministry of Irrigation and Water Management

  • Moel, H., and Aerts, J. C. J. H., 2011, Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates: Nat Hazards, v. 58, no. 1, p. 407–425

  • Murao O, Nakazato H (2010) Vulnerability functions for Buildings Based on Damage Survey Data in Sri Lanka after the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami, in Proceedings International Conference on Sustainable Built Enviroment (ICSBE), Kandy,

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niroshine MAC (2012) Adaptation to Extreme Floods Under Future Climate Change Scenarios for Colombo, Sri Lanka, International Forum for Sustainable Asia and the Pacific: Yokohama, Japan

  • Niroshinie MAC, Babel MS, Herath S (2011) A methodology to analyze extreme flooding under future climate change scenarios for Colombo, Society for Social Management Systems Internet Journal, Society for Social Management Systems

  • Notaro V, De Marchis M, Fontanazza CM, La Loggia G, Puleo V, Freni G (2014) The effect of damage functions on urban flood damage appraisal. Procedia Eng 70(0):1251–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peris N (2006) Vulnerability functions for tsunami loss estimation, in Proceedings 1st European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seimology, Volume 1121

  • Podhorányi M, Unucka J, Bobál P, Říhová V (2013) Effects of LIDAR DEM resolution in hydrodynamic modelling: model sensitivity for cross-sections. Int J Digital Earth 6(1):3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards JA (2013) Remote sensing digital image analysis: an introduction. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H (2007) Extraction of urban built-up land features from Landsat imageries using a thematic-oriented index combination technique. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 73(12):1381–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the Japan Foundation for UNU and the CECAR ASIA for providing funds for this research. FLO-2D Software, INC is appreciated for supporting this research and Flo-2D software, respectively. Much thanks to the Japan Aerospace Exploration (JAXA) for providing satellite data for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akinola Adesuji Komolafe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Komolafe, A.A., Herath, S. & Avtar, R. Development of generalized loss functions for rapid estimation of flood damages: a case study in Kelani River basin, Sri Lanka. Appl Geomat 10, 13–30 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-017-0200-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-017-0200-4

Keywords

Navigation