Skip to main content
Log in

Use of Nimesulide During Early Pregnancy and the Risk of Congenital Malformations: A Population-Based Study from Italy

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Nimesulide is the most prescribed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug in Italy, and it is currently marketed in about 50 countries worldwide. The association between the use of nimesulide in early pregnancy and the risk of birth defects was investigated in a large cohort of pregnant women from Italy.

Methods

Data were from the healthcare utilization databases of the Italian region of Lombardy. The cohort of 353,081 newborns occurring in Lombardy during the period 2005–2010 was investigated. Exposure to nimesulide during the first trimester of pregnancy, and congenital malformations detected at presentation and within 90 days after birth (outcome), were investigated. Exposure–outcome association was measured by the ratio between the prevalence of congenital malformations among users and non-users of nimesulide. Propensity score stratification was used to control for potential confounders, including maternal medical comorbidities, concomitant medications and sociodemographic characteristics.

Results

The 627 (0.18%) women who filled prescriptions for nimesulide in the first trimester of pregnancy had a 2.6-fold risk of having children with congenital urinary tract anomalies compared to those who did not (adjusted prevalence ratio 2.6; 95% CI 1.2–5.7). Weaker and non-significant evidence for congenital malformations as a whole was found (adjusted prevalence ratio 1.2, 95% CI 0.9–1.6).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that the use of nimesulide in early pregnancy may result in a greater risk of having births with congenital urinary tract anomalies.

Funding

This study was funded by grants from the Italian Ministry of the Education, University and Research (’Fondo d’Ateneo per la Ricerca’ portion, year 2015).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FitzGerald GA, Patrono C. The coxibs, selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2. New Engl J Med. 2001;345:433–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Olesen C, Steffensen FH, Nielsen GL, et al. Drug use in first trimester and lactation: a population-based survey among Danish women. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999;55:139–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moise KJ Jr. Effect of advancing gestational age on the frequency of fetal ductal constriction in association with maternal indomethacin use. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168:1350–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Suarez VR, Thompson LL, Jain V, et al. The effect of in utero exposure to indomethacin on the need for surgical closure of a patent ductus arteriosus in the neonate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:886–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ofori B, Oraichi D, Blais L, et al. Risk of congenital anomalies in pregnant users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a nested case-control study. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2006;77:268–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hernandez RK, Werler MM, Romitti P, et al. National birth defects prevention study. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use among women and the risk of birth defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:228.e1–8.

  7. Van Gelder MM, Roeleveld N, Nordeng H. Exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during pregnancy and the risk of selected birth defects: a prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e22174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Daniel S, Matok I, Gorodischer R, et al. Major malformations following exposure to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs during the first trimester of pregnancy. J Rheumatol. 2012;39(11):2163–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. European Medicines Agency. Questions and answers on the review of systemic medicines containing nimesulide. Outcome of a procedure under Article 31 of Directive 2001/83/EC as amended.

  10. Thawani V, Sontakke S, Gharpure K, et al. Nimesulide: the current controversy. Ind J Pharmacol. 2003;35:121–2.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Venegoni M, Da Cas R, Menniti-Ippolito F, et al. Effects of the European restrictive actions concerning nimesulide prescription: a simulation study on hepatopathies and gastrointestinal bleedings in Italy. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2010;46:153–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Franchi S, Heiman F, Visentin E, et al. Survey on appropriateness of use of nimesulide in nine European countries. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2015;7:51–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Prévot A, Mosig D, Martini S, et al. Nimesulide, a cyclooxygenase-2 preferential inhibitor, impairs renal function in the newborn rabbit. Pediatr Res. 2004;55(2):254–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cantarutti A, Franchi M, Monzio Compagnoni M, et al. Mother’s education and the risk of several neonatal outcomes: an evidence from an Italian population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:221.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Cantarutti A, Merlino L, Giaquinto C, et al. Use of antidepressant medication in pregnancy and adverse neonatal outcomes: a population-based investigation. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26:1100–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cantarutti A, Merlino L, Monzani E, et al. Is the risk of preterm birth and low birth weight affected by the use of antidepressant agents during pregnancy? A population-based investigation. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0168115.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Desai RJ, Rothman KJ, Bateman BT, et al. A propensity-score-based fine stratification approach for confounding adjustment when exposure is infrequent. Epidemiology. 2017;28:249–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. D’Agostino RB Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17:2265–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wulff CB, Gerds TA, Rode L, et al. Danish Fetal Medicine Study Group. Risk of fetal loss associated with invasive testing following combined first-trimester screening for Down syndrome: a national cohort of 147,987 singleton pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:38–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Aiken AR, Aiken CE, Alberry MS, et al. Management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labor: a propensity score analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:355.e1–7.

  21. Greenland S, Robins JM. Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data. Biometrics. 1985;41:55–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schneeweiss S, Rassen JA, Glynn RJ, et al. High-dimensional propensity score adjustment in studies of treatment effects using health care claims data. Epidemiology. 2009;20:512–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kallén B. Drugs during pregnancy. New York: Nova Biomedical; 2009.

  24. Vitale SG, Laganà AS, Muscatello MR, et al. Psychopharmacotherapy in pregnancy and breastfeeding. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016;71(12):721–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Galbally M, Snellen M, Lewis AJ. A review of the use of psychotropic medication in pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23(6):408–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Strom BL. Overview of automated databases in pharmacoepidemiology. In: Strom BL, editor. pharmacoepidemiology. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2000. p. 219–22.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the Pedianet Project for the support provided to the Laboratory of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology with reference to the research carried out in paediatrics and the participants of this study.

Funding

This study was funded by grants from the Italian Ministry of the Education, University and Research (’Fondo d’Ateneo per la Ricerca’ portion, year 2015). The funding source had no involvement on the study. Anna Cantarutti confirm that had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. Article processing charges were funded by the authors.

Authorship

All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.

Authorship Contributions

Anna Cantarutti, Matteo Franchi, and Federico Rea performed statistical analyses. Anna Cantarutti and Giovanni Corrao wrote the paper. Luca Merlino authorized data utilization. Giovanni Corrao was responsible for designing the study. Anna Cantarutti, Matteo Franchi, Federico Rea, Luca Merlino and Giovanni Corrao read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Disclosures

Giovanni Corrao received research support from the European Community (EC), the Italian Agency of Drug (AIFA), and the Italian Ministry for University and Research (MIUR). He took part to a variety of projects that were funded by pharmaceutical companies (i.e., Novartis, GSK, Roche, AMGEN and BMS). He also received honoraria as member of Advisory Board from Roche. Anna Cantarutti, Matteo Franchi, Federico Rea and Luca Merlino have nothing to disclose.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

According to the rules from the Italian Medicines Agency (available at: http://www.agenziafarmaco.gov.it/sites/default/files/det_20marzo2008.pdf) retrospective studies without direct contact with patients do not need a written consent to process personal data when they are used for research aims. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due confidentiality but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Cantarutti.

Additional information

Enhanced digital features

To view enhanced digital features for this article go to https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6450338.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 237 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cantarutti, A., Franchi, M., Rea, F. et al. Use of Nimesulide During Early Pregnancy and the Risk of Congenital Malformations: A Population-Based Study from Italy. Adv Ther 35, 981–992 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0735-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0735-8

Keywords

Navigation