Skip to main content
Log in

“I Do Not Know How You Feel and How I Feel About That”: Mentalizing Impairments in Machado-Joseph Disease

  • Research
  • Published:
The Cerebellum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Machado Joseph disease (MJD), also known as spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3), is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease. Mentalizing is the ability to think and understand the mental state of the other and of the self in terms of thoughts, feelings, and intentions. The aim of this study is to fill the gap in our understanding of mentalizing in MJD since there is currently very little and inconsistent research on MJD and mentalizing. A total of 18 Jews of Yemenite origin with clinically and genetically confirmed MJD, 5 pre-symptomatic MJD with a positive genetic test, and 17 Jews of Yemenite origin healthy controls, underwent a battery of tests consisting of reading the mind in the eyes (RME), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), and false belief test (FBt). The MJD group scored lower on the RME and FBt, and higher on TAS-20 test compared to control. A significant negative correlation was found between disease duration and RME score. All the pre-symptomatic participants scored within the normal clinical range in all tests. MJD patients demonstrated a widespread deficiency in the ability to mentalizing on a clinical level with autistic characteristics. These impairments may impact the patient’s interpsychic experience and daily life interactions and have important clinical implication. Pre-symptomatic participants demonstrated normal mentalizing in all tests, suggesting that the mentalizing impairments do not precede the symptoms of ataxia and are part of the clinical picture of MJD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data are available upon request.

References

  1. Bettencourt C, Lima M. Machado-Joseph disease: from first descriptions to new perspectives. Orphanet J Rare Dis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6:35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu C, Chen DB, Feng L, Zhou XX, Zhang JW, You HJ, et al. Oculomotor deficits in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: potential biomarkers of preclinical detection and disease progression. CNS Neurosci Ther. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2017;23:321–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee S, Kim H, Choi J, Kim J. Alternating monocular adducting saccadic pulses and dissociated adducting nystagmus during lateral gazes in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. J Neurol. J Neurol. 2020;267:279–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldberg-Stern H, D’jaldetti R, Melamed E, Gadoth N. Machado-Joseph (Azorean) disease in a Yemenite Jewish family in Israel. Neurology. Neurology. 1994;44:1298–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zaltzman R, Sharony R, Klein C, Gordon CR. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 in Israel: phenotype and genotype of a Jew Yemenite subpopulation. J Neurol. Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag GmbH and Co. KG. 2016;263:2207–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. do Carmo Costa M. Recent therapeutic prospects for Machado-Joseph disease. Curr Opin Neurol. NLM (Medline). 2020;33:519–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou Q, Ni W, Dong Y, Wang N, Gan S-R, Wu Z-Y. The role of apolipoprotein e as a risk factor for an earlier age at onset for machado-joseph disease is doubtful. PLoS One. Public Library of Science. 2014;9:e111356.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Durr A, Stevanin G, Cancel G, Duyckaerts C, Abbas N, Didierjean O, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia 3 and machado-joseph disease: clinical, molecular, and neuropathological features. Ann Neurol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 1996;39:490–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kieling C, Prestes P, Saraiva-Pereira M, Jardim L. Survival estimates for patients with Machado–Joseph disease (SCA3). Clin Genet. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2007;72:543–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahmadian N, van Baarsen K, van Zandvoort M, Robe PA. The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome—a meta-analysis. Cerebellum. Springer New York LLC. 2019;18:941–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmahmann JD, Sherman JC. The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain. Oxford Academic. 1998;121:561–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Braga-Neto P, Pedroso JL, Alessi H, Dutra LA, Felício AC, Minett T, et al. Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome in Machado Joseph disease: core clinical features. Cerebellum. Springer. 2012;11:549–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elyoseph Z, Mintz M, Vakil E, Zaltzman R, Gordon CR. Selective procedural memory impairment but preserved declarative memory in spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3. Cerebellum. Springer. 2020;19:226–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lopes TM, D’Abreu A, Junior MCF, Yasuda CL, Betting LE, Samara AB, et al. Widespread neuronal damage and cognitive dysfunction in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. J Neurol. Springer. 2013;260:2370–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moriarty A, Cook A, Hunt H, Adams ME, Cipolotti L, Giunti P. A longitudinal investigation into cognition and disease progression in spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7. Orphanet J Rare Dis. BioMed Central Ltd. 2016;11:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang R, Tan S, Song B, Wang J, Ge F, Sun S, et al. Cognitive impairments in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) in China. Life Sci J. 2013;10:1655–9.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Luyten P, Campbell C, Allison E, Fonagy P. The mentalizing approach to psychopathology: state of the art and future directions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2020;16:297–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Choi-Kain LW, Gunderson JG. Mentalization: ontogeny, assessment, and application in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry. American Psychiatric Association. 2008;165:1127–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sokolov AA. The cerebellum in social cognition. Front Cell Neurosci. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018;12:145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Garrard P, Martin NH, Giunti P, Cipolotti L. Cognitive and social cognitive functioning in spinocerebellar ataxia: a preliminary characterization. J Neurol. J Neurol. 2008;255:398–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmitz-Hübsch T, Du Montcel ST, Baliko L, Berciano J, Boesch S, Depondt C, et al. Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia. Neurology. Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. 2006;66:1717–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S, Hill J, Raste Y, Plumb I. The “reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. Cambridge University Press. 2001;42:241–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bagby RM, Parker JDA, Taylor GJ. The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia scale-I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res. Elsevier. 1994;38:23–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Craparo G, Faraci P, Gori A. Psychometric properties of the 20-item toronto alexithymia scale in a group of italian younger adolescents. Psychiatry Investig.. Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. 2015;12:500.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Birch SAJ, Bloom P. The curse of knowledge in reasoning about false beliefs. Psychol. Sci. SAGE Publications Sage CA Los Angeles, CA. 2007;18:382–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j1467-9280200701909.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. Eighth ed: Cengage Learning; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Peñuelas-Calvo I, Sareen A, Sevilla-Llewellyn-Jones J, Fernández-Berrocal P. The “reading the mind in the eyes” test in Autism-spectrum disorders comparison with healthy controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019;49:1048–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoche F, Guell X, Sherman JC, Vangel MG, Schmahmann JD. Cerebellar contribution to social cognition. Cerebellum. NIH Public Access. 2016;15:732–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Taylor GJ, Bagby RM. The Alexithymia personality dimension. In: The Oxford Handbook of Personality Disorders: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 647–73.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kinnaird E, Stewart C, Tchanturia K. Investigating alexithymia in autism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Psychiatry. 2019;55:80–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Leweke F, Leichsenring F, Kruse J, Hermes S. Is alexithymia associated with specific mental disorders? Psychopathology. Karger Publishers. 2011;45:22–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Petrosini L, Picerni E, Termine A, Fabrizio C, Laricchiuta D, Cutuli D. The cerebellum as an embodying machine. Neuroscientist. SAGE Publications Inc. 2022;1–18.

  33. Wellman HM, Cross D, Watson J. Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. Child Dev. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2001;72:655–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Van Overwalle F, De Coninck S, Heleven E, Perrotta G, Ben TNO, Manto M, et al. The role of the cerebellum in reconstructing social action sequences: a pilot study. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. Oxford Academic. 2019;14:549–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Clausi S, Olivito G, Siciliano L, Lupo M, Bozzali M, Masciullo M, et al. The neurobiological underpinning of the social cognition impairments in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. Cortex. Cortex. 2021;138:101–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Adjeroud N, Besnard J, El Massioui N, Verny C, Prudean A, Scherer C, et al. Theory of mind and empathy in preclinical and clinical Huntington’s disease. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. Oxford Academic. 2016;11:89–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the patients and families that participated in the study.

Funding

This work was supported by the Israeli Chief Scientist Office, Ministry of Health (CSO MOH, IL) within the framework of the European-Latin America Consortium (EU-LAC) Health Joint Fund (grant # 3-000-14307). There is no further involvement of the funding body in this study. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Zohar Elyoseph: conception and design of the study, acquisition and analysis of data, drafting a significant portion of the manuscript and figures. Dario Geisinger: conception and design of the study, drafting a significant portion of the manuscript. Roy Zaltzman: conception and design of the study, acquisition and analysis of data, drafting a significant portion of the manuscript. Erez Nave-Aival: conception and design of the study, drafting a significant portion of the manuscript. Carlos R. Gordon: conception and design of the study, acquisition, and analysis of data, drafting a significant portion of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos R. Gordon.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

The protocol of the study was approved by the Ethics Committee (Institutional Review Board) of the Meir Medical Center, Kfar-Saba, Israel, and followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elyoseph, Z., Geisinger, D., Nave-Aival, E. et al. “I Do Not Know How You Feel and How I Feel About That”: Mentalizing Impairments in Machado-Joseph Disease. Cerebellum (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-023-01536-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-023-01536-2

Keywords

Navigation