Abstract
Purpose of Review
Onychomycosis is a growing global health problem. Proper diagnosis is important in order to avoid the risks of unnecessary treatments. This review summarizes the laboratory techniques currently available for the diagnosis of onychomycosis with the advantages and disadvantages of each test.
Recent Findings
Research is underway to prove the clinical utility of other diagnostic techniques such as PAS-stained nail biopsies and molecular tests as viable alternatives for the diagnosis of onychomycosis with promissory results.
Summary
Dermoscopy can be helpful to differentiate onychomycosis from traumatic onycholysis or true melanonychia; however, a definitive diagnosis requires the demonstration of the presence of the fungi. The combination of direct microscopy using potassium hydroxide and fungal culture is the gold standard for the diagnosis of onychomycosis; however, other alternatives, such as calcofluor white under fluorescence, PAS-stained nail biopsies, and molecular techniques have proven to be excellent methods with their advantages and limitations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance.
Asz-Sigall D, Tosti A, Arenas R. Tinea Uunguium: Ddiagnosis and Ttreatment in Ppractice. Mycopathologia. 2017;182:95–100.
• Bonifaz A, Rios-Yuil JM, Arenas R, Araiza J, Fernández R, Mercadillo-Pérez P, et al. Comparison of direct microscopy, culture and calcofluor white for the diagnosis of onychomycosis. Rev. Iberoam Micol. 2013;30:109–11. Study highlighting the usefulness of CW
• Rios-Yuil JM, Bonifaz A, Arenas R, Araiza J, Fernández R, Mercadillo-Pérez P, et al. Mycological studies of nail samples obtained by curettage vs. vertical perforation of the nail plate. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27:1189–90. Study comparing nail sampling techniques
Kaur R, Kashyap B, Bhalla P. Onychomycosis – Eepidemiology, Ddiagnosis and Mmanagement. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2008;26:108–16.
•• Velasquez-Agudelo V, Cardona-Arias JA. Meta-analysis of the utility of culture, biopsy, and direct KOH examination for the diagnosis of onychomycosis. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17:166. Meta-analysis showing PAS-staining is a very good alternative for the diagnosis of onychomycosis
• Jung MY, Shim JH, Lee JH, Lee JH, Yang JM, Lee DY, et al. Comparison of diagnostic methods for onychomycosis, and proposal of a diagnostic algorithm. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2015;40:479–84. Proposes a diagnostic algorithm for onychomycosis
Ohn J, Choe YS, Park J, Mun JH. Dermoscopic patterns of fungal melanonychia: Aa comparative study with other causes of melanonychia. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:488–93.
Bet DL, Reis AL, Di Chiacchio N, Belda JW. Dermoscopy and Oonychomycosis: guided nail abrasion for mycological samples. An Bras Dermatol. 2015;90:904–6.
Blake N, Zhu J, Hernandez G, Juliano PJ. A Rretrospective Rreview of Ddiagnostic Ttesting for Oonychomycosis of the Ffoot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2015;105:503–8.
Jeelani S, Ahmed QM, Lanker AM, Hassan I, Jeelani N, Fazili T. Histopathological examination of nail clippings using PAS staining (HPE-PAS): gold standard in diagnosis of Oonychomycosis. Mycoses. 2015;58:27–32.
Bombace F, Iovene MR, Galdiero M, Martora F, Nicoletti GF, D'’Andrea M, et al. Non-dermatophytic onychomycosis diagnostic criteria: an unresolved question. Mycoses. 2016;59:558–65.
Gomez-Moyano E, Erchiga VC, Martínez Pilar L, Godoy Diaz DJ. [Which is the role of cultures in the diagnosis of onychomycosis?]. Rev. Iberoam Micol. 2015;32:129–30.
Ovrén E, Berglund L, Nordlind K, Rollman O. Dermatophytosis: fluorostaining enhances speed and sensitivity in direct microscopy of skin, nail and hair specimens from dermatology outpatients. Mycoses. 2016;59:436–41.
•• Stephen S, Tosti A, Rubin AI. Diagnostic applications of nail clippings. Dermatol Clin. 2015;33:289–301. Highlights the applications and correct technique for obtaining nail clippings
Hajar T, Fernández-Martínez R, Moreno-Coutiño G, Vásquez Del Mercado E, Arenas R. Modified PAS stain: Aa new diagnostic method for onychomycosis. Rev. Iberoam Micol. 2016;33:34–7.
Watanabe S, Ishida K. Molecular Ddiagnostic Ttechniques for Oonychomycosis: Vvalidity and Ppotential Aapplication. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2017;18:281–6.
•• Verrier J, Monod M. Diagnosis of Ddermatophytosis Uusing Mmolecular Bbiology. Mycopathologia. 2017;182:193–202. Comprehensive review of molecular diagnostic methods
Kotrotsiou T, Chatzimichaloglou A, Nasr A, Spandou E, Patsatsi A, Sotiriadis D, et al. A comparative study of three extraction protocols of DNA from nails: Ppotential use in the diagnosis of onychomycoses. Mycoses. 2017;60:183–7.
Spiliopoulou A, Bartzavali C, Jelastopulu E, Anastassiou ED, Christofidou M. Evaluation of a commercial PCR test for the diagnosis of dermatophyte nail infections. J Med Microbiol. 2015;64(Pt 1):25–31.
Feng X, Ling B, Yang X, Liao W, Pan W, Yao Z. Molecular Iidentification of Ccandida Sspecies Iisolated from Oonychomycosis in Shanghai, China. Mycopathologia. 2015;180(5–6):365–71.
Petinataud D, Berger S, Ferdynus C, Debourgogne A, Contet-Audonneau N, Machouart M. Optimising the diagnostic strategy for onychomycosis from sample collection to FUNGAL identification evaluation of a diagnostic kit for real-time PCR. Mycoses. 2016;59:304–11.
Gong J, Ran M, Wang X, Wan Z, Li R. Development and Eevaluation of a Nnovel Rreal-Ttime PCR for Ppan-Ddermatophyte Ddetection in Nnail Sspecimens. Mycopathologia. 2016;181:51–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no competing interests.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Fungal Infections of Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rios-Yuil, J.M. Onychomycosis Laboratory Diagnosis: Review. Curr Fungal Infect Rep 11, 92–97 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12281-017-0285-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12281-017-0285-6