Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnosis of onychomycosis clinically by nail dermoscopy versus microbiological diagnosis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diagnosis of onychomycosis requires microbiological studies, which are time-consuming. Dermoscopy is non invasive, easy and coastless method. To evaluate the diagnostic role of dermoscopy in onychomycosis and comparing its findings with microbiological results. Eighty patients with onychomycosis and 40 controls were studied for nail dermoscopic finding, and microbiological examinations in the form of microscopic examination by 20% KOH, Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA), and HiCrome Candida Differential Agar. 72.5% of the patients were females. Most of the patient were presented with one finger (35%) and two fingers (35%). 85% of the patient were presented clinically with distal lateral subungual onychomycosis followed by total dystrophic onychomycosis (12.5%) and lastly with superficial white onychomycosis (2.5%). 52.5% and 75% of the patients were positive by direct microscopic examination with 20%KOH and SDA, respectively. Dermatophytes isolated from 7.5% of the patient, non-dermatophytes (Aspergillus) was isolated from 2.5%, and 65% had Candida by SDA. C. albicans was the commonest species (75%), followed by C. tropicalis (17.3%), and lastly C. krusei (7.7%). Dermoscopic examinations of patients showed nail spikes, longitudinal striations, and color changes in 75%, 82.5%, and 95%, respectively, with statistically significant P value (P < 0.001). There was significant difference regarding long striations and yellow coloration dermoscopic finding with positive KOH patients. All patients with positive culture showed nail spikes on dermoscopic examination. Dermoscopy is a rapid tool for diagnosis of onychomycosis. Longitudinal striations is the best diagnostic dermoscopic finding. Microbiological test are still needed for accurate and reliable diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaur R, Kashyap B, Bhalla P (2008) Onychomycosis, epidemiology, diagnosis and management. Indian J Med Microbiol 26:108–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta AK, Jain HC, Lynde CW, Macdonald P, Cooper EA, Summerbell RC (2000) Prevalence and epidemiology of onychomycosis in patients visiting physicians' offices, a multicentre Canadian survey of 15000 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol 43:244–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta AK, Paquet M, Simpson FC (2013) Therapies for the treatment of onychomycosis. Clin Dermatol 31(5):544–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bet DL, dos Reis AL, Di Chiacchio N, Belda Junior W (2015) Dermoscopy and onychomycosis: guided nail abrasion for mycological samples. An Bras Dermatol 90(6):904–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Hoshy KH, Abdel Hay RM, El-Sherif RH, Salah Eldin M, Moussa MF (2015) Nail dermoscopy is a helpful tool in the diagnosis of onychomycosis: a case control study. Eur J Dermatol 25(5):494–495

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tiodorović Zivković D, Jovanović D, Lazarević V, Janković A, Tiodorović J (2006) Dermoscopy of melanoma. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat 15(4):187–190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Piraccini BM, Alessandrini A (2015) Onychomycosis: a review. J Fungi 1(1):30–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Westerberg DP, Voyack MJ (2013) Onychomycosis: current trends in diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician 88(11):762–770

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Szepietowski JC, Salomon J (2007) Do fungi play a role in psoriatic nails? Mycoses 50(6):437–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Piraccini BM, Balestri R, Starace M, Rech G (2013) Nail digital dermoscopy (onychoscopy) in the diagnosis of onychomycosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 27(4):509–513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Souza LK, Fernandes OF, Passos XS, Costa CR, Lemos JA, Silva MR (2010) Epidemiological and mycological data on onychomycosis in Goiana, Brazil. Mycoses 53:68–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gelotar P, Vachhani S, Patel B, Makwana N (2013) The prevalence of fungi in fingernail onychomycosis. J Clin Diagn Res 7(2):250–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maraki S, Mavromanolaki VE (2016) Epidemiology of onychomycosis in Crete, Greece: a 12 year study. Mycoses 59:798–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Papini M, Piraccini BM, Difonso E, Brunoro A (2015) Epidemiology of onychomycosis in Italy: prevalence data and risk factor identification. Mycoses 58:659–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Youssef AB, Kallel A, Azaiz Z, Jemel S, Bada N, Chouchen A, Belhadj-Salah N, Fakhfakh N, Belhadj S, Kallel K (2018) Onychomycosis: which fungal species are involved? Experience of the Laboratory of Parasitology-Mycology of the Rabta Hospital of Tunis. J Mycol Med 28(4):651–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jeelani S, Ahmed QM, Lanker AM, Hassan I, Jeelani N, Fazili T (2015) Histopathological examination of nail clippings using PAS staining (HPE-PAS): gold standard in diagnosis of onychomycosis. Mycoses 58(1):27–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Alkhayat H, Al-Sulaili N, O’Brien E, McCuaig C, Watters K (2009) The PAS stain for routine diagnosis of onychomycosis. Bahrain Med Bull 31:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shenoy MM, Teerthanath S, Karnaker VK, Girisha BS, Krishna Prasad MS, Pinto J (2008) Comparison of potassium hydroxide mount and mycological culture with histopathologic examination using periodic acid-Schiff staining of the nail clippings in the diagnosis of onychomycosis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 74:226–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sehgal VN, Srivastava G, Dogra S, Chaudhary A, Adhikari T (2010) Onychomycosis: an Asian perspective. Skinmed 8:37–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Beena S, Sreeja MV, Bhavana PR, SreenivasaBabu S (2013) onychomycosis: prevalence and its etiology in a tertiary care hospital, South India. Int J Health Sci Res 3(10):81–85

    Google Scholar 

  21. Piraccini BM, Bruni F, Starace M (2012) Dermoscopy of non-skin cancer nail disorders. Dermatol Ther 25:594–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grover C, Jakhar D (2017) Onychoscopy: a practical guide. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 83(5):536–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ghannoum M, Mukherjee P, Isham N, Markinson B, Rosso JD, Leal L (2018) Examining the importance of laboratory and diagnostic testing when treating and diagnosing onychomycosis. Int J Dermatol 57:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Velasquez-Agudelo V, Cardona-Arias JA (2017) Meta-analysis of the utility of culture, biopsy, and direct KOH examination for the diagnosis of onychomycosis. BMC Infect Dis 17:166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rothmund G, Sattler EC, Kaestle R, Fischer C, Haas CJ, Starz H, Welzel J (2013) Confocal laser scanning microscopy as a new valuable tool in the diagnosis of onychomycosis—comparison of six diagnostic methods. Mycoses 56(1):47–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mostafa I. El-Amir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nada, E.Ed.A., El Taieb, M.A., El-Feky, M.A. et al. Diagnosis of onychomycosis clinically by nail dermoscopy versus microbiological diagnosis. Arch Dermatol Res 312, 207–212 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-019-02008-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-019-02008-6

Keywords

Navigation