Skip to main content
Log in

Forensic Thinking in Disability Assessment: an Introduction to a Special Issue

  • Published:
Psychological Injury and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Adelman, H. S., Lauber, B. A., Nelson, P., & Smith, D. C. (1989). Toward a procedure for minimizing and detecting false positive diagnoses of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948902200407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. American Psychologist, 68, 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association on Higher Education and Disability. (2012). Supporting accommodation requests: Guidance on documentation practices. Retrieved from: https://www.ahead.org/professional-resources/white-papers-guiding-documents

  • Bibber v. National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners, Inc. (2016). Unites States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania, Civil Action 15 – 4987.

  • Burns, P. B., Rohrich, R. J., & Chung, K. C. (2011). The levels of evidence and their role in evidence-based medicine. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 128(1), 305–310.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Faust, D., Hart, K. J., Guilmette, T. J., & Arkes, H. R. (1988). Neuropsychologists’ capacity to detect adolescent malingerers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19(5), 508–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M., Lewandowski, L., Murphy, K., & Dempsey, K. (2002). ADA-based accommodations in higher education: A survey of clinicians about documentation requirements and diagnostic standards. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(4), 357–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, S. A., & Shuman, D. W. (1997). Irreconcilable conflict between therapeutic and forensic roles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28(1), 50–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G. (2017). Clinical, ethical, and forensic implications of a flexible threshold for LD and ADHD in postsecondary settings. Psychological Injury and Law, 10, 138–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G., & Edwards, M. J. (2010). Symptom exaggeration in post-secondary students: Preliminary base rates in a Canadian sample. Applied Neuropsychology, 17(2), 135–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G., Lovett, B. J., & Gordon, M. (2013). Documenting disabilities in postsecondary settings: Diagnosticians’ understanding of legal regulations and diagnostic standards. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 28(4), 303–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G., Nay, S., & Armstrong, I. T. (2016). Diagnostic accuracy of the Conners’ Adult ADHD rating scale in a postsecondary population. Journal of Attention Disorders, Advanced Online Publication, 1087054715625299.

  • Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S. R., & Participants, C. (2009). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(7), 1093–1129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, K., & LaDuke, C. (2015). Foundational aspects of forensic mental health assessment. In B. Cutler & P. Zapf (Eds.), APA handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 3–18). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, G. (2014). Improving the methodology for identifying cognitive impairment in psychiatry and neurology. In Keynote lecture presented at the 25 th Anniversary Conference of the Swedish Neuropsychological Society. Stockholm: Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, M. W. (Ed.). (2015). Validity testing in child and adolescent assessment. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasser, J., & Adams, K. (2007). The effects of war on children: School psychologists’ role and function. School Psychology International, 28(1), 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. M., & Hunsley, J. (2015). Evidence-based practice: Separating science from pseudoscience. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 60(12), 534–540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewak, D. (2018). Rich parents are using doctor’s notes to help kids cheat the SATs. In New York post Retrieved from https://nypost.com/2018/05/02/rich-parents-are-using-doctors-notes-to-help-kids-cheat-the-sats/.

  • Lovett, B. J., & Lewandowski, L. J. (2015). Testing accommodations for students with disabilities: Research-based practice. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, B. J., Gordon, M., & Lewandowski, L. J. (2016). Legal conceptions of impairment: Implications for the assessment of psychiatric disabilities. In S. Goldstein & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Assessing impairment: From theory to practice (2nd ed., pp. 125–139). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015). Neuropsychologists’ validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of North American professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(6), 741–776.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. (2018). “The system is clearly abused”: Why 2018 was a terrible year for emotional support pets on planes. Yahoo lifestyle news. Accessed at: https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/emotional-support-pets-fire-2018-whos-blame-183631908.html

  • Millis, S. R., & Kaufmann, P. M. (2018). Assessment of incomplete effort and malingering in the neuropsychological examination. In J. E. Morgan & J. H. Ricker (Eds.), Textbook of clinical neuropsychology (2nd ed., pp. 927–941). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M., & Condit, D. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(8), 1094–1102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, N. W., Sweet, J. J., Berry, D. T., Bryant, F. B., & Granacher, R. P. (2007). Response validity in forensic neuropsychology: Exploratory factor analytic evidence of distinct cognitive and psychological constructs. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13(3), 440–449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC). (2016). Inquiry report on systemic barriers to academic accommodation for postsecondary students with mental health disabilities. In Retrieved from http://www.ohrc.on.ca/sites/default/files/With%20learning%20in%20mind_inquiry%20report%20on%20systemic%20barriers%20to%20accademic%20accommodation_accessible_2017.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaywitz, S. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia. New York: Vintage

  • Suhr, J. A. (2015). Psychological assessment: A problem-solving perspective. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, B. K., May, K., & Galbally, L. (2007). Symptom exaggeration by college adults in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disorder assessments. Applied Neuropsychology, 14(3), 189–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin J. Lovett.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

No original data from human participants were collected for this paper.

Animal Rights

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lovett, B.J., Harrison, A.G. Forensic Thinking in Disability Assessment: an Introduction to a Special Issue. Psychol. Inj. and Law 12, 1–6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09347-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09347-9

Keywords

Navigation