Abstract
The measurement of functional impairment is hardly a mere academic enterprise, given the current demand for clinical evaluations of disability status. For instance, witness the recent controversies over US military veterans seeking benefits through certification of psychiatric disability (e.g., McNally & Frueh, 2012) or individuals convicted of murder who may feign intellectual disability to avoid the death penalty (e.g., Chafetz & Biondolillo, 2012). More generally, individuals seeking access to specialized accommodations and services in school or at work are pursuing assessments that establish their qualification as having a disability. To satisfy those requests, clinicians have to understand how the law defines disability and the level of documentation required to establish that an individual has a disability. These legal definitions of disability push clinicians to shift focus from the familiar terrain of symptom counts and psychological test scores to the less traveled path of assessing impairment in actual functioning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act, Pub. L. 110–325. (2008).
Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unified theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65–94.
Berry, D. T. R., Baer, R. A., Rinaldo, J. C., & Wetter, M. W. (2002). Assessment of malingering. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Clinical personality assessment: Practical approaches (2nd ed., pp. 269–302). New York: Oxford University Press.
Berry, D. T., & Nelson, N. W. (2010). DSM-5 and malingering: A modest proposal. Psychological Injury and Law, 3(4), 295–303.
Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Tröster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H., et al. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 419–426.
Chafetz, M. D., & Biondolillo, A. (2012). Validity issues in Atkins death cases. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26, 1358–1376.
DeRight, J., & Carone, D. A. (2015). Assessment of effort in children: A systematic review. Child Neuropsychology, 21(1), 1–24. doi:10.1080/09297049.2013.864383.
Drogin, E. Y., Dattilio, F. M., Sadoff, R. L., & Gutheil, T. G. (2011). Handbook of forensic assessment: Psychological and psychiatric perspectives. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Faust, D., Hart, K. J., Guilmette, T. J., & Arkes, H. R. (1988). Neuropsychologists’ capacity to detect adolescent malingerers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19(5), 508.
Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (2001). Helping teachers formulate sound test accommodation decisions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 174–181.
Gordon, M., Lewandowski, L., Murphy, K., & Dempsey, K. (2002). ADA-based accommodations in higher education: A survey of clinicians about documentation requirements and diagnostic standards. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 357–363.
Green, P., Rohling, M. L., Lees-Haley, P. R., & Allen, L. M., III. (2001). Effort has a greater effect on test scores than severe brain injury in compensation claimants. Brain Injury, 15, 1045–1060.
Harrison, A. G., Edwards, M. J., & Parker, K. C. H. (2007). Identifying students faking ADHD: Preliminary findings and strategies for detection. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22, 577–588.
Harrison, A. G., Lovett, B. J., & Gordon, M. (2013). Documenting disabilities in postsecondary settings: Diagnosticians’ understanding of legal regulations and diagnostic standards. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 28, 303–322.
Hess, F. M., & Petrilli, M. J. (2006). No child left behind primer. New York: Peter Lang.
Hopkins, K. D. (1998). Educational and psychological measurement and evaluation (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Hughes, C. A., & Dexter, D. D. (2011). Response to intervention: A research-based summary. Theory Into Practice, 50(1), 4–11.
Iverson, G. L. (2006). Ethical issues associated with the assessment of exaggeration, poor effort, and malingering. Applied Neuropsychology, 13(2), 77–90.
Jachimowicz, G., & Geiselman, R. E. (2004). Comparison of ease of falsification of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder diagnosis using standard behavioral rating scales. Cognitive Science Online, 2, 6–20.
Joiner, A. M. (2010). The ADAAA: Opening the floodgates. San Diego Law Review, 47(2), 331–370.
Jones, A. B., & Llewellyn, L. J. (1918). Malingering, or the simulation of disease. Philadelphia, PA: Blakiston’s.
Latham, P. S., Latham, P. H., & Mandlawitz, M. R. (2008). Special education law. Boston: Pearson.
Lewandowski, L. J., Lovett, B. J., Codding, R. S., & Goddon, M. (2008). Symptoms of ADHD and academic concerns in college students with and without ADHD diagnoses. Journal of Attention Disorders, 12, 156–161.
Lovett, B. J. (2010). Extended time testing accommodations for students with disabilities: Answers to five fundamental questions. Review of Educational Research, 80, 611–638.
Lovett, B. J., Gordon, M., & Lewandowski, L. J. (2009). Measuring impairment in disability evaluations: Legal and ethical issues. In S. Goldstein & J. Naglieri (Eds.), Assessment of impairment: From theory to practice (pp. 93–103). New York: Springer.
Lovett, B. J., & Lewandowski, L. J. (2015). Testing accommodations for students with disabilities: Research-based practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Mackintosh, N. J. (2011). IQ and human intelligence (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Maddux, J. E., Gosselin, J. T., & Winstead, B. A. (2012). Conceptions of psychopathology: A social constructionist perspective. In J. E. Maddux & B. A. Winstead (Eds.), Psychopathology: Foundations for a contemporary understanding (3rd ed., pp. 3–22). New York: Routledge.
McNally, R. J., & Frueh, B. C. (2012). Why we should worry about malingering in the VA system: Comment on Jackson et al. (2011). Journal of Traumatic Stress, 25, 454–456.
Murphy, K., & Gordon, M. (1997). ADHD as a basis for test accommodations: A primer for clinicians. The ADHD Report, 5(1), 10–11.
National Disability Law Reporter (1996, July 10). Golden Gate University (CA) Complaint No. 09-96-2088. National Disability Law Reporter, 9, 182ff.
Office of Special Education Programs. (1995). Letter to Lillie/Felton. Retrieved from http://www.wrightslaw.com/info/elig.sld.osep.felton.htm
Osmon, D. C., Plambeck, E. A., Klein, L., & Mano, Q. (2006). The Word Reading Test of effort in adult learning disability: A simulation study. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 315–324.
Rozalski, M., Katsiyannis, A., Ryan, J., Collins, T., & Stewart, A. (2010). Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments of 2008. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 21(1), 22–28.
Sax, G. (1997). Principles of educational and psychological measurement and evaluation (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Scott, C. L. (2010). The Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008: Implications for the forensic psychiatrist. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 38(1), 95–99.
Suhr, J., & Spickard, B. (2007). Including measures of effort in neuropsychological assessment of pain- and fatigue-related medical disorders. In K. B. Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective (pp. 259–280). New York: Guilford.
Sullivan, B. K., May, K., & Galbally, L. (2007). Symptom exaggeration by college adults in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disorder assessments. Applied Neuropsychology, 14, 189–207.
Yell, M. L. (2012). The law and special education (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Zirkel, P. A., & Thomas, L. B. (2010). State laws for RTI: An updated snapshot. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(3), 56–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lovett, B.J., Gordon, M., Lewandowski, L.J. (2016). Legal Conceptions of Impairment: Implications for the Assessment of Psychiatric Disabilities. In: Goldstein, S., Naglieri, J. (eds) Assessing Impairment. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7996-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7996-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7994-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7996-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)