Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of Hydrochar from Anaerobically Digested Sewage Sludge and Manure as a Soil Amendment on Soil Properties and Plant Responses

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil amendments, such as pyrochar (PC) and hydrochar (HC), have the potential to enhance soil properties and crop yields. The objective was to investigate the effects of HC from anaerobic digestion effluent (ADE) of sewage sludge (SS), ADE of manure (M), and PC, as soil amendments. Lettuce seeds were sown and grown in soil amended with chars at rates of 1 to 15 g char/kg soil. Soil properties and plant responses were compared to soil without amendment (control). Soil amended with HC-ADE-SS and HC-ADE-M had higher pH, phosphorus content, and cation exchange capacity than the control. All treatments and the control resulted in 80% + emergence rates. Root dry mass of plants grown on soil with 10 and 15 g/kg was higher than the control. No negative effects were observed in emergence and whole-plant dry biomass, indicating that HC-ADE-SS and HC-ADE-M could be amended without negative impacts on soil properties and plant responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data reported is included in the article or in the Supplementary Material.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Davis JD, Whiting D (2013) Choosing a soil amendment. Color State Univ Ext (2):235. https://extension.colostate.edu/topic-areas/yard-garden/choosing-a-soil-amendment/. Accessed March 2019

  2. Sohi SP, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E, Bol R (2010) A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Adv Agron:47–82.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(10)05002-9

  3. Karhu K, Mattila T, Bergström I, Regina K (2011) Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity—results from a short-term pilot field study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140:309–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kammann C, Ratering S, Eckhard C, Müller C (2012) Biochar and hydrochar effects on greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and methane) Fluxes from Soils. J Environ Qual 41(4):1052

  5. Fellet G, Marchiol L, Delle Vedove G, Peressotti A (2011) Application of biochar on mine tailings: effects and perspectives for land reclamation. Chemosphere 83(9):1262–1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.03.053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalderis D, Papameletiou G, Kayan B (2018) Assessment of orange peel hydrochar as a soil amendment: impact on clay soil physical properties and potential phytotoxicity. Waste Biomass Valorization. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0364-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Raimundo L, Joel A, Castro R, Benedito A (2019) Release of nutrients and organic carbon in different soil types from hydrochar obtained using sugarcane bagasse and vinasse. Geoderma 334:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van ZL, Kimber S, Morris S et al (2010) Effects of biochar from slow pyrolysis of papermill waste on agronomic performance and soil fertility. Plant Soil 327:235–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0050-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Soja G, Anders E, Bucker J et al (2016) Biochar applications to agricultural soils in temperate climates—more than carbon sequestration? In: Bruckman V, Varol E, Uzun B, Liu J (eds) Biochar: A Regional Supply Chain Approach in View of Climate Change Mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 291–314

  10. Eibisch N, Schroll R, Fuß R (2015) Effect of pyrochar and hydrochar amendments on the mineralization of the herbicide isoproturon in an agricultural soil. Chemosphere 134:528–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson NO, Agudelo SC, Yuan W, Gan J (2011) Nitrogen and phosphorus availability in biochar-amended soils. Soil Sci 176(5):218–226. https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e3182171eac

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dugan E, Verhoef A, Robinson T, Sohi S (2010) Bio-char from sawdust, maize stover and charcoal: impact on water holding capacities (WHC) of three soils from Ghana. World Congr. Soil Sci. Soil Solut. a Chang. World. (August), 9–12

  13. Bargmann I, Rillig MC, Kruse A, Greef J, Kücke M (2014) Effects of hydrochar application on the dynamics of soluble nitrogen in soils and on plant availability. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177:48–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201300069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dieguez-Alonso A, Funke A, Anca-Couce A et al (2018) Towards biochar and hydrochar engineering—influence of process conditions on surface physical and chemical properties, thermal stability, nutrient availability, toxicity and wettability. Energies 11(3):496

  15. Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota—a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43(9):1812–1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jian X, Zhuang X, Li B et al (2018) Comparison of characterization and adsorption of biochars produced from hydrothermal carbonization and pyrolysis. Environ Technol Innov 10:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2018.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Breulmann M, van Afferden M, Muller RA, Schulz E, Fuhner C (2017) Process conditions of pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization affect the potential of sewage sludge for soil carbon sequestration and amelioration. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 124:256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2017.01.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Busch D, Stark A, Kammann CI, Glaser B (2013) Genotoxic and phytotoxic risk assessment of fresh and treated hydrochar from hydrothermal carbonization compared to biochar from pyrolysis. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 97:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.07.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Castellini M, Giglio L, Niedda M, Palumbo AD, Ventrella D (2015) Impact of biochar addition on the physical and hydraulic properties of a clay soil. Soil Tillage Res 154:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.06.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Paneque M, Knicker H, Kern J, De la Rosa JM (2019) Hydrothermal carbonization and pyrolysis of sewage sludge: effects on Lolium perenne germination and growth. Agronomy 9(363):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9070363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Puccini M, Ceccarini L, Antichi D et al (2018) Hydrothermal carbonization of municipal woody and herbaceous prunings: hydrochar valorisation as soil amendment and growth medium for horticulture. Sustainability 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030846

  22. Roig N, Sierra J, Martí E, Nadal M, Schuhmacher M, Domingo JL (2012) Long-term amendment of Spanish soils with sewage sludge: effects on soil functioning. Agric Ecosyst Environ 158:41–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.05.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wagner A, Kaupenjohann M (2014) Suitability of biochars (pyro- and hydrochars) for metal immobilization on former sewage-field soils. Eur J Soil Sci (January):139–148.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12090

  24. Yuan H, Lu T, Wang Y, Chen Y, Lei T (2016) Sewage sludge biochar: nutrient composition and its effect on the leaching of soil nutrients. Geoderma 267:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yue Y, Yao Y, Lin Q, Li G, Zhao X (2017) The change of heavy metals fractions during hydrochar decomposition in soils amended with different municipal sewage sludge hydrochars. J Soils Sediments:763–770.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1312-2

  26. Anderson CR, Condron LM, Clough TJ et al (2011) Biochar induced soil microbial community change: implications for biogeochemical cycling of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus. Pedobiologia 54(5–6):309–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2011.07.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yue Y, Cui L, Lin Q, Li G, Zhao X (2017) Efficiency of sewage sludge biochar in improving urban soil properties and promoting grass growth. Chemosphere 173:551–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Owsianiak M, Brooks J, Renz M, Laurent A (2018) Evaluating climate change mitigation potential of hydrochars: compounding insights from three different indicators. GCB Bioenergy 10(4):230–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Trupiano D, Cocozza C, Baronti S et al (2017) The effects of biochar and its combination with compost on lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) growth, soil properties, and soil microbial activity and abundance. Int J Agron 2017(i):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3158207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Upadhyay KP, George D, Swift RS, Galea V (2014) The influence of biochar on growth of lettuce and potato. J Integr Agric 13(3):541–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60710-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ashworth AJ, Sadaka SS, Allen FL, Sharara MA, Keyser PD (2014) Influence of pyrolysis temperature and production conditions on switchgrass biochar for use as a soil amendment. BioResources 9(4):7622–7635. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.9.4.7622-7635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jones N, Benton J (1999) Soil analysis: handbook of reference methods. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton

  33. Culman S, Mann M, Brown C (2019) Calculating cation exchange capacity, base saturation, and calcium saturation. Ohioline Ohio State Univ. Ext. https://ohioline.osu.edu/factsheet/anr-81. Accessed 15 Sept 2019

  34. Spectrum Analytic. Agronomic library: percent saturation. https://spectrumanalytic.com/. Accessed 1 Jul 2019

  35. Huezo L, Vasco-Correa J, Shah A (2021) Hydrothermal carbonization of anaerobically digested sewage sludge for hydrochar production. Bioresour Technol Rep 15(September):100795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2021.100795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mäkelä M, Benavente V, Fullana A (2015) Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass: effect of process conditions on hydrochar properties. Appl Energy 155:576–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.06.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. International Biochar Initiative (2015) Standardized product definition and product testing guidelines for biochar that is used in soil. Int Biochar Initiative (November). https://www.biochar-international.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/IBI_Biochar_Standards_V2.1_Final.pdf. Accessed 9 Aug 2019

  38. Shreckhise JH, Owen JS, Niemiera AX (2018) Growth response of three containerized woody plant taxa to varying low phosphorus fertilizer concentrations. HortScience 53(5):628–637. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci12449-17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. George C, Wagner M, Kücke M, Rillig MC (2012) Divergent consequences of hydrochar in the plant-soil system: Arbuscular mycorrhiza, nodulation, plant growth and soil aggregation effects. Appl Soil Ecol 59:68–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang H, Chen C, Gray EM, Boyd SE, Yang H, Zhang D (2016) Roles of biochar in improving phosphorus availability in soils: a phosphate adsorbent and a source of available phosphorus. Geoderma 276:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.04.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Busch D, Kammann C, Grünhage L, Müller C (2012) Simple biotoxicity tests for evaluation of carbonaceous soil additives: establishment and reproducibility of four test procedures. J Environ Qual 41(4):1023–1032. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Libra JA, Ro KS, Kammann C et al (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2(1):71–106. https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.10.81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bargmann I, Rillig MC, Buss W, Kruse A, Kuecke M (2013) Hydrochar and biochar effects on germination of spring barley. J Agron Crop Sci 199:360–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Rillig MC, Wagner M, Salem M et al (2010) Material derived from hydrothermal carbonization: effects on plant growth and arbuscular mycorrhiza. Appl Soil Ecol 45(3):238–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2010.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schimmelpfennig S, Müller C, Grünhage L, Koch C, Kammann C (2014) Biochar, hydrochar and uncarbonized feedstock application to permanent grassland—effects on greenhouse gas emissions and plant growth. Agric Ecosyst Environ 191:39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Roß C, Thomas FD, Reibe K, Klaus-peter G, Ellmer F, Ruess L (2015) Impact of quality and quantity of biochar and hydrochar on soil Collembola and growth of spring wheat. Soil Biol Biochem 83:2013–2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Libra J, Ro K, Kammann C et al (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residual: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2(1):71–106. https://doi.org/10.4155/bfs.10.81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Subramanian D, Subha R, Murugesan AK (2022) Accumulation and translocation of trace elements and macronutrients in different plant species across five study sites. Ecol Indic 135:108522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Fei Y, Zhao D, Cao Y et al (2019) Phosphorous retention and release by sludge-derived hydrochar for potential use as a soil amendment. J Environ Qual. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2018.09.0328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kambo HS, Dutta A (2015) A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 45:359–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.050

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was partially supported by state and federal funds appropriated to The Ohio State University and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (SEEDS Award).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA

    Luis Huezo & Ajay Shah

Authors
  1. Luis Huezo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ajay Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: Luis Huezo and Ajay Shah; methodology: Luis Huezo and Ajay Shah; formal analysis and investigation: Luis Huezo; writing-original draft preparation: Luis Huezo; writing-review and editing: Ajay Shah and Luis Huezo; funding acquisition: Ajay Shah; resources: Ajay Shah; supervision: Ajay Shah.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajay Shah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 315 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huezo, L., Shah, A. Effect of Hydrochar from Anaerobically Digested Sewage Sludge and Manure as a Soil Amendment on Soil Properties and Plant Responses. Bioenerg. Res. 16, 1195–1204 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-022-10479-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-022-10479-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation