Skip to main content
Log in

Is the concept of forgiveness universal? a cross-cultural perspective comparing western and eastern cultures

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To understand the conceptualizations of forgiveness more comprehensively, both the cognitive and emotional aspects of forgiveness were investigated across different cultures. Two studies examined cultural similarities and differences in the conceptualizations of forgiveness. In Study 1, we compared idioms of the Chinese and English languages. In Study 2, we compared transgression-related writings between Hong Kong Chinese and Americans. In Study 1 (N = 204), we found that the basic presumptions of forgiveness (i.e., the recognition of transgression and the idea of cancelling debt) were similar across cultures. The cognitive dimension of forgiveness (which involves virtues that preserve social relationships) was more frequently observed in Chinese idioms than English idioms. In Study 2 (N = 68), we found that similar emotional responses (e.g., shame and guilt) arose across cultures following one’s own wrongdoing. Chinese writers were more likely to adopt higher cognitive processing in understanding forgiveness than American writers, as was reflected in their writings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, G. (2005). The cultural grounding of personal relationship: Enemyship in north American and west African worlds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 948–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, G., & Plaut, V. C. (2003). The cultural grounding of personal relationship: Friendship in north American and west African worlds. Personal Relationships, 10, 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augsburger, D. W. (1996). Helping people forgive. Westminster: John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Exline, J. J., & Sommer, K. L. (1999). The victim role, grudge theory, and two dimensions of forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington Jr. (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives (pp. 79–104). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belgrave, F. Z. (2010). In K. W. Allison (Ed.), African American psychology: From Africa to America. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. D., & Acock, A. (2013). Marital well-being and religiousness as mediated by relational virtue and equality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 164–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmers-Sommer, T. M. (2003). When partners falter: Repair after a transgression. In D. J. Canary & M. Dainton (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 185–205). Mawah: Erlbaum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Exline, J. J., Worthington Jr., E. L., Hill, P., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Forgiveness and justice: A research agenda for social and personality psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, H., Watkins, D., & Hui, E. K. F. (2004). Personality correlates of the disposition towards interpersonal forgiveness : A Chinese perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 305–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, M. Y., & Fung, H. H. (2011). A dynamic model of forgiveness: A cross-cultural perspective. Review of General Psychology, 15, 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hook, J., Worthington, E. L., Davis, D. E., Watkins, D., Hui, E., Luo, W., Fu, H., Shulruf, B., Morris, P., & Reyna, S. H. (2013). A China-New Zealand comparison of forgiveness. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16(4), 286–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hook, J., Worthington, E. L., & Utsey, S. O. (2009). Collectivism, forgiveness, and social harmony. The Counseling Psychologist, 37, 821–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, V. K. Y., & Bond, M. H. (2009). Target’s face loss, motivations, and forgiveness following relational transgression: Comparing Chinese and US cultures. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karremans, J. C., Regalia, C., Paleari, F. G., Finchan, F. D., Cui M., & Takada, N. et al. (2011). Maintaining harmony acorss the globe: The cross-cultural association between closeness and interpersonal forgiveness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 443-451.

  • Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (2000). The psychology of forgiveness: History, conceptual issues, and overview. In M. E. MuCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Theory, research and practice (pp. 1–16). New York & London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Bono, G., & Root, L. M. (2007). Rumination, emotion, and forgiveness: Three longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 490–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Root, L. M., & Cohen, A. D. (2006). Writing about the benefits of an interpersonal transgression facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 887–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Root, L. M., Tabak, B., & Witvliet, C. V. O. (2009). Forgiveness. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of positive psychology (2nd ed., pp. 427–435). New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukashema, I., & Mullet, E. (2010). Reconciliation sentiment among victims of genocide in Rwanda: Conceptualizations, and relationships with mental health. Social Indicators Research, 99(1), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullet, E., Barros, J., Frongia, L., Usai, V., Neto, F., & Rivière-Shafighi, S. (2003). Religious involvement and the forgiving personality. Journal of Personality, 71, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orth, U., Berking, M., Walker, N., & Znoj, H. (2008). Forgiveness and psychological adjustment following interpersonal transgressions: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, A. D. (2008). A cross-cultural study of the concept and process of forgiveness. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Patrick, S., Beckenbach, J., Sells, J., & Reardon, R.F. (2013). An empirical investigation into justice, grace, and forgiveness: Paths to relationship satisfaction. The Family Journal: Counselling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 21, 146-153.

  • Sandage, S. J., Hill, P. C., & Vang, H. C. (2003). Toward a multicultural positive psychology: Indigenous forgiveness and Hmong culture. The Counseling Psychologist, 31, 564–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandage, S. J., & Wiens, T. W. (2001). Contextualizing models of humility of forgiveness : A reply to Gassin. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 29, 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, W., & Yuhong, J. (2015). Comparison and contrast between English and Chinese idioms from cultural connotation perspective. Studies in Literature and Language, 10, 102–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, N. G., & Worthington, E. L. (2003). Overcoming interpersonal offenses: Is forgiveness the only way to deal with unforgiveness? Journal of Counseling and Development, 81, 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, J. P., & Duck, S. (1995). Having and managing enemies: A very challenging relationship. In S. Duck & J. T. Wood (Eds.), Confronting relationship challenges (pp. 43–72). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington Jr., E. L. (2006). Forgiveness and reconciliation. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Man Yee Ho.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest. Both authors declare that both of them have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ho, M.Y., Worthington, E.L. Is the concept of forgiveness universal? a cross-cultural perspective comparing western and eastern cultures. Curr Psychol 39, 1749–1756 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9875-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9875-x

Keywords

Navigation