Abstract
Time perspective theory addresses how individuals’ emphasis on past, present, and future events influence their behavior. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between time perspective and academic performance among college students using longitudinal, official GPA data, while also considering students’ intended academic engagement—that is, their stated intention to engage in academically beneficial behavior toward the beginning of the semester. Overall, the future, present-hedonistic, present-fatalistic, and past-negative time perspectives were associated with intended academic engagement, while only the future, present-fatalistic and past-negative time perspectives were associated with GPA in the subsequent two semesters. However, only the future time perspective was a unique predictor of intended academic engagement and GPA. Furthermore, intended academic engagement was found to mediate the relationship between future time perspective and GPA after one semester but not two semesters. The results underscore the importance of the future time perspective in relation to academic performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelabu, D. H. (2008). Future time perspective, hope, and ethnic identity among African American adolescents. Urban Education, 43, 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085907311806.
Barber, L. K., Munz, D. C., Bagsby, P. G., & Grawitch, M. J. (2009). When does time perspective matter? Self-control as a moderator between time perspective and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 250–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.007.
de Bilde, J., Vansteenkiste, M., & Lens, W. (2011). Understanding the association between future time perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory. Learning and Instruction, 21, 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.002.
Bowles, T. (2008). The relationship of time orientation with perceived academic performance and preparation for assessment in adolescents. Educational Psychology, 28, 551–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701880134.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
Horstmanshof, L., & Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first-year university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906x160778.
Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3402_4.
King, R. B. (2015). Does your approach to time matter for your learning? The role of time perspectives on engagement and achievement. Educational Psychology, 36, 1264–1284. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1045835.
King, R. B., & Gaerlan, M. J. (2014). How you perceive time matters for how you feel in school: Investigating the link between time perspectives and academic emotions. Current Psychology, 33, 282–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9213-x.
King, R. B., & Gaerlan, M. J. (2015). The role of time perspectives in the use of volitional strategies. Psychological Studies, 60, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-014-0278-2.
Kuncel, N. R., Credé, M., & Thomas, L. L. (2005). The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75, 63–82. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001063.
Lens, W., Simons, J., & Dewitte, S. (2001). Student motivation and self-regulation as a function of future time perspective and perceived instrumentality. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications (pp. 233–248). New York: Pergamon.
Lewin, K. (1942). Time perspective and morale. In G. Lewin (Ed.), Resolving social conflicts (pp. 103–124). New York: Harper.
Mello, Z. R., & Worrell, F. C. (2006). The relationship of time perspective to age, gender, and academic achievement among academically talented adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 29, 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320602900302.
Mello, Z. R., Worrell, F. C., & Andretta, J. R. (2009). Variation in how frequently adolescents think about the past, the present, and the future in relation to academic achievement. Research on Child and Adolescent Development [Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung], 2, 173–183.
Peetsma, T. D. (2000). Future time perspective as a predictor of school investment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44, 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696667.
Precin, P. J. (2017). Past negative time perspective as a predictor of grade point average in occupational therapy doctoral students. The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 5. https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1264.
Roberts, W. A. (2002). Are animals stuck in time? Psychological Bulletin, 128, 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.128.3.473.
Shell, D. F., & Husman, J. (2001). The multivariate dimensionality of personal control and future time perspective beliefs in achievement and self-regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 481–506. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1073.
Suddendorf, T. (2013). Mental time travel: Continuities and discontinuities. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 151–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.011.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02209024.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding authors states that there is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barnett, M.D., Melugin, P.R. & Hernandez, J. Time Perspective, Intended Academic Engagement, and Academic Performance. Curr Psychol 39, 761–767 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9771-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9771-9