Skip to main content
Log in

Emotion and the False Consensus Effect

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of emotion on the false consensus effect was investigated. Participants were recruited from an undergraduate population. There were 210 participants (89 male) with a mean age of 19.25 years. The study took place online. Participants made a choice between two forms of vacation, and were induced to feel an emotion (happiness, neutral, or sadness). They were then asked to estimate the percentage of people who would opt for either the same choice as them or the alternate choice, and to make an attribution for this predicted behavior. Results revealed a false consensus effect (estimates of a vacation’s popularity were higher from participants who preferred that option than from participants who preferred the alternative option), an influence of emotion on consensus estimates (participants experiencing happiness made higher estimates of consensus than participants experiencing sadness), and an influence of emotion on attribution. Results were consistent with valence-based theoretical accounts of emotional influence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgardner, A. H., & Arkin, R. M. (1988). Affective state mediates causal attributions for success and failure. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. E. (1982). A false consensus bias in 1980 presidential preferences. Journal of Social Psychology, 118, 137–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, J. R. (2008). Explaining false uniqueness: Why we are both better and worse than others. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 878–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, M. D. (2011). Emotion and the self-serving bias. Current Psychology, 30, 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, M. D. (2013). Emotion and the ultimate attribution error. Current Psychology, 32, 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P. (1998). On being happy and mistaken: mood effects on the fundamental attribution error. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 318–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Mood effects on person perception judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 53–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J. P., & Locke, J. (2005). Affective influences on causal inferences: the effects of mood on attributions for positive and negative interpersonal episodes. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 1071–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koestner, R., Losier, G. F., Worren, N. M., Baker, L., & Vallerand, R. J. (1995). False consensus effects for the 1992 Canadian referendum. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 27, 214–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8. Gainesville: University of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedenthal, P. M., & Setterlund, M. B. (1994). Emotion congruence in perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 401–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pronin, E., Lin, D., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, S. R., Thompson, K. L., McKenzie, M., & Rosenbaum, A. (2016). Psychological research in the internet age: the quality of web-based data. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 354–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: an egocentric bias in social perception and attribution process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Templer, K. J., & Lange, S. R. (2008). Internet testing: equivalence between proctored lab and unproctored field conditions. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1216–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uvacsek, M., Nepusz, T., Naughton, D. P., Mazanof, J., Ránky, M. Z., & Petróczi, A. (2011). Self-admitted behavior and perceived use of performance-enhancing vs psychoactive drugs among competitive athletes. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 21, 224–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E. (1966). Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 73–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, S. (2000). Students’ estimates of the prevalence of drug use: evidence for a false consensus effect. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 295–298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin D. Coleman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coleman, M.D. Emotion and the False Consensus Effect. Curr Psychol 37, 58–64 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9489-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9489-0

Keywords

Navigation