Skip to main content
Log in

The Bumblebee Flies Anyway: the Success of Contextual Constructionism

  • Published:
The American Sociologist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although Spector and Kitsuse’s Constructing Social Problems (CSP) is often credited with launching constructionist theory, this obscures the contributions of other sociologists pursuing parallel lines of research. CSP’s advocacy of a strict constructionist position has largely been ignored by constructionist researchers. Although some conflist-oriented socioogists argue that it is time to move beyond constructionism, it remains the best-developed theory of social problems. At the same time, it is necessary to develop the theory in new directions, particularly by synthesizing case studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These are my terms (Best 1989). I borrowed the term strict constructionism from Richard Nixon, who as president, said that he was seeking to nominate strict constructionist judges to the Supreme Court. It was a way of poking fun at what I saw as an untenable stance. To my delight, the label stuck.

References

  • Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. (1989). Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. (1993). But seriously folks: The limitations of the strict constructionist interpretation of social problems. In J. A. Holstein & G. Miller (Eds.), Reconsidering social constructionism: Debates in social problems theory (pp. 129–147). Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. (2006). Blumer’s dilemma: The critic as a tragic figure. American Sociologist, 37(3), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. (2015). Beyond case studies: Expanding the constructionist framework for social problems research. Qualitative Sociology Review, 11(2), 18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, J., & Loseke, D. R. (2018). Prospects for the sociological study of social problems. In A. J. Treviño (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of social problems (Vol. 1, pp. 169–182). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Blumer, H. (1971). Social problems as collective behavior. Social Problems, 18(3), 298–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, E. P. (1968). Crimes without criminals: Witchcraft and its control in renaissance Europe. Law and Society Review, 3(1), 7–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dello Buono, R. A. (2013). Time to change the subject: A new sociology of praxis. Current Sociology, 39(6), 795–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dello Buono, R. A. (2015). Reimagining social problems: Moving beyond social constructionism. Social Problems, 62(3), 331–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, K. T. (1966). Wayward puritans: A study in the sociology of deviance. New York: WIley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, J. R. (1963). Symbolic crusade: Status politics and the American temperance movement. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, R. R. (1967). Moral passage: The symbolic process in public designations of deviance. Social Problems, 15(2), 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, J. R. (1981). The culture of public problems: Drinking-driving and the symbolic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, J. R. (1985). Theories and hobgoblins. SSSP Newsletter, 17(1), 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2003). A constructionist analytics for social problems. In J. A. Holstein & G. Miller (Eds.), Challenges and choices: Constructionist perspectives on social problems (pp. 187–208). Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, P. R., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1993). Vernacular constituents of moral discourse: An interactionist proposal for the study of social problems. In J. A. Holstein & G. Miller (Eds.), Reconsidering social constructionism: Debates in social problems theory (pp. 25–58). Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitsuse, J. I., & Cicourel, A. V. (1963). A note on the uses of officials statistics. Social Problems, 11(2), 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitsuse, J. I., & Schneider, J. W. (1989). Preface. In J. Best (Ed.), Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems (pp. xi–xiv). Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, A. L. (1975). Social problems as social movements. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, A. L., & Wolfe, J. C. (Eds.). (1977). This land of promises: The rise and fall of social problems in America. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T. R., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1994). Prologue. In T. R. Sarbin & J. I. Kitsuse (Eds.), Constructing the social (pp. 1–18). Thousand Okays: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J. W. (1985). Defining the definitional perspective on social problems. Social Problems, 32(3), 232–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1977). Constructing social problems. Menlo Park: Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, D. (2014). Contemporary social constructionism: Key themes. Phiadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, C. (1981). The politics of alcoholism: Building an arena around a social problem. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. (1981). Interests and explanation in the social study of science. Social Studies of Science, 11(3), 365–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S., & Pawluch, D. (1985a). Ontological gerrymandering: The anatomy of social problems explanations. Social Problems, 32(3), 214–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S., & Pawluch, D. (1985b). How shall we move beyond constructivism? Social Problems, 33(2), 159–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel Best.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Best, J. The Bumblebee Flies Anyway: the Success of Contextual Constructionism. Am Soc 50, 220–227 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-018-9386-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-018-9386-0

Keywords

Navigation