Abstract
In this paper I argue that the dominance of certain paradigms and theories on policies can have an influence on the value added by impact assessments. A link exists between paradigms and theories and policies and consequently the practices humans develop to tackle real world problems. I also argue that different types of thinking (contained in paradigms and theories) need to be integrated, at least at the scientific level, to enhance our understanding of social phenomena. This in turn can have a positive influence on policy processes that follow impact assessment recommendations. I am not arguing for the adoption of theoretical positions by practitioners, Instead, I contend that if impact assessments are informed by a variety of paradigms and theories, the policy practitioner might have a better understanding of the issue and the moral choices he or she needs to make. I will highlight the connection between theory and policies with practical examples from the social impact assessment of the De Hoop Dam, which was constructed on the Steelpoort River. I also argue for an integration of different theories to give a deeper understanding of real world problems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
I would like to thank one of the reviewers for the idea on the origins of emotions.
References
Allan, C., & Curtis, A. (2005). Nipped in the bud: Why regional scale adaptive management is not blooming. Environmental Management, 36(3), 414–425.
Breede-Overberg Catchment Management Agency (BOCMA). (2011). Draft Breede-Overberg Catchment management strategy. Worcester: Breede-Overberg Catchment Management Agency.
Claassen, M. (2013). Integrated water resource management in South Africa. International Journal of Water Governance, 1, 323–338.
Du Plessis, A. (2000). Charting the course of the water discourse through the fog of International Relations theory. In H. Solomon & A. Turton (Eds.), Water wars: Enduring myth or impending reality (pp. 9–34). The African Centre for the Constructive Resolution of Disputes: Durban.
Duvall, R., & Varadarajan, L. (2003). On the practical significance of critical international relations theory. Asian Journal of Political Science, 11(2), 75–88.
Firestein, S. (2014). The pursuit of ignorance. New York: TED. http://www.ted.com/talks/stuart_firestein_the_pursuit_of_ignorance.
Herring, E. (1999). Response to Mervyn Frost: The systematic violation of ethical norms in British foreign policy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 12(2), 90–92.
Hobson, J. M., & Seabrooke, L. (2007). Everyday IPE: Revealing everyday forms of change in the world economy. In J. M. Hobson & L. Seabrooke (Eds.), Everyday politics of the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoffmann, M. J. (2003). Constructing a complex world: The frontiers of international relations theory and foreign policy-making. Asian Journal of Political Science, 1(2), 37–57.
Isaacman, A. F., & Isaacman, B. S. (2014). Dams, displacement, and the delusion of development: Cahora Bassa and its legacies in Mozambique, 1965–2007. Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kurki, M., & Wight, C. (2013). International relations and social science. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki & S. Smith (Eds.), International relations theories: Discipline and diversity (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lake, D. A. (2013). Theory is dead, long live theory: The end of the great debates and the rise of eclecticism in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 567–587.
Lebow, R. N. (2007). What can we know? How do we know? In R. N. Lebow & M. I. Lichbach (Eds.), Theory and evidence in comparative politics and international relations (pp. 1–25). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lebow, R. N. (2008). A cultural theory of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lebow, R. N. (2011). Review article: Philosophy of science. International Affairs, 87(5), 1219–1228.
Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 97–129). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Makara, M., & Motebang, M. (2005). Environmental impact assessment: Infrastructure development. Specialised study: Social impact assessment. Pretoria: Council for Scientific and Industrial Research.
Mearsheimer, J. J., & Walt, S. M. (2013). Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad of international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 427–457.
Meissner, R. (2004). The transnational role and involvement of interest groups in water politics: A comparative analysis of selected Southern African case studies. Pretoria: D.Phil. Dissertation in the Faculty of Humanities, University of Pretoria.
Meissner, R. (2005). Interest groups and the proposed Epupa Dam: Towards a theory of water politics. Politeia, 24(3), 354–370.
Meissner, R. (2015). The governance of urban wastewater treatment infrastructure in the Greater Sekhukhune District Municipality and the application of analytic eclecticism. International Journal of Water Governance, 3(2), 79–110. doi:10.7564/14-IJWG55.
Meissner, R., & Funke, N. (2014). The politics of establishing catchment management agencies in South Africa: The case of the Breede-Overberg Catchment Management Agency. In D. Huitema & S. Meijerink (Eds.), The politics of river basin organisations: Coalitions, institutional design choices and consequences (pp. 184–210). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Meissner, R., Funke, N., Nienanber, S., & Ntombela, C. (2013). The status quo of research on South Africa’s water resources management institutions. Water SA, 13(5), 721–732.
Morgan, P. M. (2003). National and international security: Theory then, theory now. Asian Journal of Political Science, 11(2), 58–74.
Morrison-Saunders, A., & Retief, F. (2012). Walking the sustainability assessment talk—Progressing the practice of environmental impact assessment (EIA). Environmental Impact Assessment, 36, 34–41.
Noble, B. F. (2009). Promise and dismay: The state of strategic environmental assessment systems and practices in Canada. Environmental Impact Assessment, 29(1), 66–75.
Oxford Dictionary. (2014). Oxford dictionaries: Language matters. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/. Accessed on: June 2, 2014.
Partidario, M. R., & Sheate, W. R. (2013). Knowledge brokerage—Potential for increased capacities and shared power in impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 39, 26–36.
Patomaki, H., & Wight, C. (2000). After postpositivism? The promises of critical realism. International Studies Quarterly, 44(2), 213–237.
Pollard, S., & Du Toit, D. (2011). Towards adaptive integrated water resources management in Southern Africa: The role of self-organisation and multi-scale feedbacks for learning and responsiveness in the Letaba and Crocodile catchments. Water Resources Management, 25, 4019–4035.
Rosenau, J. N. (1992). Governance, order, and change in world politics. In J. N. Rosenau & E. O. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance without government: Order and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenau, J. N. (2003). The theoretical imperative: Unavoidable explication. Asian Journal of Political Science, 11(2), 7–20.
Rueschemeyer, D. (2009). Usable theory: Analytic tools for social and political research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sil, R. (2000). The questionable status of boundaries: The need for integration. In R. Sil & E. M. Doherty (Eds.), Beyond boundaries? Disciplines, paradigms, and theoretical integration in international studies (pp. 1–28). Albany: University of New York Press.
Sil, R. (2009). Simplifying pragmatism: From social theory to problem-driven eclecticism. International Studies Review, 11(3), 648–652.
Sinclair, T. J. (1996). Beyond international relations theory: Robert W. Cox and approaches to world order. In R. W. Cox & T. J. Sinclair (Eds.), Approaches to world order (pp. 3–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Southern African Program on Ecosystem Change and Society. (2014). Water resources management in South Africa: Towards a new paradigm. Grahamstown: Southern African Program on Ecosystem Change and Society.
Stankey, G. H., Bormann, B. T., Ryan, C., Shindler, B., Sturtevant, V., Clark, R. N., & Philpot, C. (2003). Adaptive management and the Northwest Forest Plan: Rhetoric and reality. Journal of Forestry, 101, 40–46.
Toje, A. (2002). Ethics in foreign policy: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 15(1), 7–8.
Weber, R. (2004). The rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: A personal view. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), iii–xii.
Zacher, M. W. (1992). The decaying pillars of the Westphalian temple: Implications for international order and governance. In J. N. Rosenau & E. O. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance without government: Order and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Acknowledgments
Ms Engela van Heerden, the Subject Librarian at the CSIR, is acknowledged for her assistance in sourcing some of the material as well as supplying the abbreviations for the journals. I would also like to acknowledge the anonymous reviewers for their review of the manuscript. The CSIR is acknowledged for providing financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meissner, R. The Relevance of Social Theory in the Practice of Environmental Management. Sci Eng Ethics 22, 1345–1360 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9700-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9700-y