Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measuring consensus about scientific research norms

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we empirically explore some manifestations of norms for the conduct of science. We focus on scientific research ethics and report survey results from 606 scientists who received funding in 1993 and 1994 from the Division of Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Biology Directorate of the National Science Foundation. We also report results for 91 administrators charged with overseeing research integrity at the scientists’ research institutions. Both groups of respondents were presented with a set of scenarios, designed by fractional factorial methods, describing different kinds of scientific conduct that in the eyes of some would likely be unethical. Respondents then were asked to evaluate each of these scenarios for how unethical the behavior might be and what kinds of sanctions might be appropriate. We use the responses to consider the nature of consensus around norms related to the practice of science and in particular, similarities and differences between scientists and science administrators. Implications for policy are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Merton, R.K (1973) The Normative Structure of Science, in: The Sociology of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miller, D.J. and Herson, M. (eds.) (1992) Research Fraud in the Behavior and Biomedical Sciences: Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Academy of Sciences. (1995) On Being a Scientist: Responsible Conduct in Research. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hamilton, D.P. (1992) In the Trenches: Doubts About Scientific Integrity, Science 225: 1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaiser, J. (1995) Commission Proposes New Definition of Misconduct, Science 269: 1811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirk, R.E. (1982) Experimental Design (Second Edition), chapter 13, Brooks/Cole, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rossi P.H and Nock, S.L. (1982) Measuring Social Judgements: A Factorial Survey Approach, Sage Publications, Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wenger, N.S., Korenman, S.G., Berk, R.A., and Liu, H.H., (1998) Reporting Unethical Research Behavior, Academic Medicine 73: 1187–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rossi, P.H., and Berk, R.A. (1985) Varieties of Normative consensus, American Sociological Review 50: 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rossi, P.H. and Berk R.A., (1997) Just Punishments: Federal Guidelines and Public Views Compared, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coleman, J.S (1990) Foundations Of Social Theory, Harvard Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meares, T.L. and Kahan, D.M. (1998) Law and (Norms of) Order in the Inner City, Law & Society Review 32: 805–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Benaquito, L. and Freed, P.J. (1996) The Myth of Intimate Lawlessness: The Perceived Contradiction between Self and Other in Inmates’ Support for Criminal Justice Sanctioning Norms, Law & Society Review 30: 481–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sampson, R.J. and Bartusch, D.J. (1998) Legal Cynicism and (subcultural?) Tolerance of Deviance: The Neighborhood Context of Racial Differences, Law & Society Review 32: 777–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Paternoster, R. and Simpson, S. (1996) Sanction Threats and Appeals to Morality: Testing a Rational Choice Model of Corporate Crime, Law & Society Review 30: 549–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuperan K. and Sutinen, J.G (1998) Blue Water Crime: Deterrence, Legitimacy and Compliance in Fisheries, Law & Society Review 32: 309–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamilton, D. (1992) In the Trenches, Doubts about Scientific Integrity, Science 255: 1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kalichman, M and Friedman, P.J. (1992) A Study of Biomedical trainees’ Perceptions Concerning Research ethics, Academic Medicine 67: 769–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Anderson, M. and Seashore, L.K. (1994) The Graduate Student Experience and Subscription to the Norms of Science, Research on Higher Education 35; 273–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Swazey, J.P., Anderson, M.S., and Lewis, K.S. (1993) Ethical Problems in Academic Research, American Scientist 81: 542–553

    Google Scholar 

  21. Korenman, S.G., Berk, R.A., Wenger, N.S., and Lew, V. (1998) Evaluation of the Research Norms of Scientists and Administrators Responsible for Academic Research Integrity, Journal of the American Medical Association 279: 41–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wenger, N.S., Korenman, S.G., Berk, R.A. and Liu, H.H., (1999) Reporting Unethical Research Behavior, Evaluation Review 23: 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gigi, A. (1991) Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis, John Wiley, New York: 153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hox, J.J., Kreft, I.G.G. and Hermkens, P.L.J. (1991) The analysis of Factorial Surveys, Sociological Methods and Research 4: 493–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cleveland, W.S. (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 74: 829–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Berk, R.A., Brackman, H., and Lesser, S. (1997) Measure of Justice: An Empirical Study, Changes in the California Penal Code, 1955–1971, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles

    Richard A. Berk

  2. Department of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, 90095-7041, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Stanley G. Korenman & Neil S. Wenger

Authors
  1. Richard A. Berk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stanley G. Korenman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Neil S. Wenger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berk, R.A., Korenman, S.G. & Wenger, N.S. Measuring consensus about scientific research norms. SCI ENG ETHICS 6, 315–340 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-000-0035-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-000-0035-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation