Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Desynchrony Between Subjective and Genital Sexual Arousal in Women: Theoretically Interesting but Clinically Irrelevant

  • Invited Commentary
  • Published:
Current Sexual Health Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chivers ML, Seto MC, Lalumière ML, Laan E, Grimbos T. Agreement of self-reported and genital measures of sexual arousal in men and women: a meta-analysis. Arch Sex Behav. 2010;39(1):5–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sintchak G, Geer JH. A vaginal plethysmograph system. Psychophysiology. 1975;12(1):113–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Levin RJ. The physiology of sexual arousal in the human female: a recreational and procreational synthesis. Arch Sex Behav. 2002;31(5):405–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pennebaker JW, Roberts T-A. Toward a his and hers theory of emotion: gender differences in visceral perception. J Soc Clin Psychol. 1992;11(3):199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Korff J, Geer JH. The relationship between sexual arousal experience and genital response. Psychophysiology. 1983;20(2):121–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Handy AB, Meston CM. Interoceptive awareness moderates the relationship between perceived and physiological genital arousal in women. J Sex Med Elsevier Inc. 2016;13(12):1907–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Handy AB, Meston CM. Interoception and awareness of physiological sexual arousal in women with sexual arousal concerns. J Sex Marital Ther Taylor & Francis. 2018;44:398–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rellini AH, McCall KM, Randall PK, Meston CM. The relationship between women’s subjective and physiological sexual arousal. Psychophysiology. 2005;42(1):116–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brotto LA, Chivers ML, Millman RD, Albert A. Mindfulness-based sex therapy improves genital-subjective arousal concordance in women with sexual desire/arousal difficulties. Arch Sex Behav Springer US. 2016;45(8):1907–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brotto LA, Seal BN, Rellini A. Pilot study of a brief cognitive behavioral versus mindfulness-based intervention for women with sexual distress and a history of childhood sexual abuse. J Sex Marital Ther. 2012;38(1):1–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Velten J, Margraf J, Chivers ML, Brotto LA. Effects of a mindfulness task on women’s sexual response. J Sex ResTaylor & Francis. 2017;0(0):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brody S, Laan E, Van Lunsen RHW. Concordance between women’s physiological and subjective sexual arousal is associated with consistency of orgasm during intercourse but not other sexual behavior. J Sex Marital Ther. 2003;29(1):15–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brody S. Intercourse orgasm consistency, concordance of women’s genital and subjective sexual arousal, and erotic stimulus presentation sequence. J Sex Marital Ther. 2007;33(1):31–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Graham CA, Sanders SA, Milhausen RR, McBride KR, Graham CA, Sanders SA, et al. Turning on and turning off: a focus group study of the factors that affect women’s sexual arousal. Arch Sex Behav. 2004;33(6):527–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Handy AB, Stanton AM, Meston CM. What does sexual arousal mean to you? Women with and without sexual arousal concerns describe their experiences. J Sex Res. in press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Cindy M. Meston & Amelia M. Stanton

Authors
  1. Cindy M. Meston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amelia M. Stanton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cindy M. Meston.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Cindy M. Meston and Amelia M. Stanton declare no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meston, C.M., Stanton, A.M. Desynchrony Between Subjective and Genital Sexual Arousal in Women: Theoretically Interesting but Clinically Irrelevant. Curr Sex Health Rep 10, 73–75 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-018-0155-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-018-0155-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation