Skip to main content
Log in

Intraoperative Echocardiography: Guide to Decision-Making

  • Echocardiography (JM Gardin and AH Waller, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This review aims to provide a concise overview of key recommendations, with a specific focus on common challenges faced by intraoperative echocardiographers when dealing with frequently encountered valvular pathologies and mechanical circulatory support. It offers valuable insights for medical practitioners in this field.

Recent Findings

The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) have released updated comprehensive guidelines for the use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for the assessment of cardiac structures and implanted devices to help guide intraoperative decision-making.

Summary

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a regularly employed intraoperative diagnostic and monitoring tool, offering various modalities for the rapid evaluation of valvular and aortic pathology, hemodynamic disturbances, and cardiac function. It is particularly valuable in assessing and placing mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices, providing views often challenging to obtain through transthoracic echocardiography. Additionally, intraoperative TEE can be used for decision-making in patients with valvular disease allowing incorporation of patient-specific and situational factors. Echocardiographers can employ this information in real-time to help guide surgical treatment selection such as repair, replacement, or deferral of intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. •• Nicoara A, Skubas N, Ad N, Finley A, Hahn RT, Mahmood F, et al. Guidelines for the use of transesophageal echocardiography to assist with surgical decision-making in the operating room: a surgery-based approach: from the American Society of Echocardiography in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020;33:692–734. This study details the most recent consensus guidelines for the comprehensive use of TEE for surgical decision-making from the American Society of Echocardiography.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. •• Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Gentile F, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021;143:e72–227. This study details the most recent comprehensive practice guidelines for management of patients with valvular heart disease from the ACC/AHA.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Maslow A. Mitral valve repair: an echocardiographic review: part 2. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29:439–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Deja MA, Grayburn PA, Sun B, Rao V, She L, Krejca M, et al. Influence of mitral regurgitation repair on survival in the surgical treatment for ischemic heart failure trial. Circulation. 2012;125:2639–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Acker MA, Parides MK, Perrault LP, Moskowitz AJ, Gelijns AC, Voisine P, et al. Mitral-valve repair versus replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:23–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Edvardsen T, Goldstein S, et al. Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:372–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu J, Cong X, Lou Z, Zhang M. Trend and impact of concomitant CABG and multiple-valve procedure on in-hospital outcomes of SAVR patients. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:740084.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Boodhwani M, de Kerchove L, Glineur D, Poncelet A, Rubay J, Astarci P, et al. Repair-oriented classification of aortic insufficiency: impact on surgical techniques and clinical outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:286–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. le Polain de Waroux JB, Pouleur AC, Robert A, Pasquet A, Gerber BL, Noirhomme P, et al. Mechanisms of recurrent aortic regurgitation after aortic valve repair: predictive value of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:931–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chorin E, Rozenbaum Z, Topilsky Y, Konigstein M, Ziv-Baran T, Richert E, et al. Tricuspid regurgitation and long-term clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;21:157–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Deshmukh A, Bhatia A, Sayer GT, Kim G, Raikhelkar J, Imamura T, et al. Left atrial appendage occlusion with left ventricular assist device decreases thromboembolic events. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107:1181–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Glas KE, Swaminathan M, Reeves ST, Shanewise JS, Rubenson D, Smith PK, et al. Guidelines for the performance of a comprehensive intraoperative epiaortic ultrasonographic examination: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; endorsed by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20:1227–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saeed D, Feldman D, Banayosy AE, Birks E, Blume E, Cowger J, et al. The 2023 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for mechanical circulatory support: a 10-year update. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023;42:e1–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kassis H, Cherukuri K, Agarwal R, Kanwar M, Elapavaluru S, Sokos GG, et al. Significance of residual mitral regurgitation after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation. JACC Heart Fail. 2017;5:81–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fierro MA, Welsby IJ. Identification of severe mitral stenosis using real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography during an left ventricular assist device insertion. Anesth Analg. 2016;123:1089–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Estep JD, Chang SM, Bhimaraj A, Torre-Amione G, Zoghbi WA, Nagueh SF. Imaging for ventricular function and myocardial recovery on nonpulsatile ventricular assist devices. Circulation. 2012;125:2265–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Song HK, Gelow JM, Mudd J, Chien C, Tibayan FA, Hollifield K, et al. Limited utility of tricuspid valve repair at the time of left ventricular assist device implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:2168–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bellavia D, Iacovoni A, Scardulla C, Moja L, Pilato M, Kushwaha SS, et al. Prediction of right ventricular failure after ventricular assist device implant: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19:926–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liao KK, Miller L, Toher C, Ormaza S, Herrington CS, Bittner HB, et al. Timing of transesophageal echocardiography in diagnosing patent foramen ovale in patients supported with left ventricular assist device. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:1624–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Banfi C, Pozzi M, Siegenthaler N, Brunner ME, Tassaux D, Obadia JF, et al. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: cannulation techniques. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8:3762–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sorokin V, MacLaren G, Vidanapathirana PC, Delnoij T, Lorusso R. Choosing the appropriate configuration and cannulation strategies for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the potential dynamic process of organ support and importance of hybrid modes. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19(Suppl 2):75–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Natalia Cesky for her scientific illustrations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All Authors contributed to the writing and preparation of the main manuscript text and figures.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Cutrone.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cutrone, M., Cotter, S., Swaminathan, M. et al. Intraoperative Echocardiography: Guide to Decision-Making. Curr Cardiol Rep (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-024-02054-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-024-02054-1

Keywords

Navigation